World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
34606
World Ranking
9283
National Ranking
37

Jahn M. Nesland publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jahn M. Nesland sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 520 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jahn M. Nesland D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jahn M. Nesland sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jahn M. Nesland is affiliated with Oslo University Hospital in Norway and contributes to multiple scientific fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Engineering, and Medicine. Their research intersects areas such as Cancer Research, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, indicating a multidisciplinary approach to scientific inquiry.

The scientist's recent scholarly output includes a publication titled "Corrigendum to 'Induction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha overexpression by cobalt chloride enhances cellular resistance to photodynamic therapy' [Canc. Lett 244 (2006) 182-189]", published in 2020 in the journal Cancer Letters.

The main research topics addressed by Nesland encompass:

  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies

Frequent academic collaborators associated with Nesland's work include:

  • Zhenyu Ji
  • Guanrui Yang
  • Susan Shahzidi
  • Kinga Tkacz-Stachowska
  • Zhenhe Suo

Their work is primarily published in journals such as Cancer Letters, which appears as a preferred venue for disseminating research findings related to oncological studies.

Nesland's research integrates molecular and cellular biology with technological innovation, particularly focusing on hypoxia-related mechanisms in cancer cells and their response to therapeutic interventions like photodynamic therapy. The use of nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics highlights a focus on developing advanced methods for diagnosis and treatment at the nanoscale level.

This combination of expertise in life sciences and engineering supports contributions that address complex biomedical challenges and advance knowledge in cancer biology and treatment strategies.

Best Publications

  • DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis

    Jirina Bartkova;Zuzana Horejsí;Karen Koed;Alwin Krämer

  • 5-Aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy. Clinical research and future challenges.

    Qian Peng;Trond Warloe;Kristian Berg;Johan Moan

  • 5‐Aminolevulinic Acid‐Based Photodynamic Therapy: Principles and Experimental Research

    Qian Peng;Kristian Berg;Johan Moan;Magne Kongshaug

  • Morphologic reappraisal of serrated colorectal polyps.

    Emina Torlakovic;Eva Skovlund;Dale C Snover;Goran Torlakovic

  • Snail, Slug, and Smad‐interacting protein 1 as novel parameters of disease aggressiveness in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma

    Sivan Elloul;Mari Bukholt Elstrand;Jahn M. Nesland M.D.;Claes G. Tropé M.D.

  • Different Gene Expression Patterns in Invasive Lobular and Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast

    Hongjuan Zhao;Anita Langerød;Youngran Ji;Kent W. Nowels

  • Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients

    Vera M Abeler;Odd Røyne;Steinar Thoresen;Håvard E Danielsen

  • Detection of Isolated Tumor Cells in Bone Marrow Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer

    Gro Wiedswang;E. Borgen;R. Kåresen;Gunnar Kvalheim

  • TP53 mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer

    Anita Langerød;Hongjuan Zhao;Ørnulf Borgan;Jahn M. Nesland;Jahn M. Nesland

  • Frameshift-mutation-derived peptides as tumor-specific antigens in inherited and spontaneous colorectal cancer

    Ingvil Sæterdal;Jens Bjørheim;Kari Lislerud;Marianne K. Gjertsen

  • Persistence of Disseminated Tumor Cells in the Bone Marrow of Breast Cancer Patients Predicts Increased Risk for Relapse—A European Pooled Analysis

    Wolfgang Janni;Florian D. Vogl;Gro Wiedswang;Marit Synnestvedt

  • EGFR family expression in breast carcinomas. c‐erbB‐2 and c‐erbB‐4 receptors have different effects on survival

    Zhenhe Suo;Bjørn Risberg;Mats G. Kalsson;Kenneth Willman

  • Correlation of subcellular and intratumoral photosensitizer localization with ultrastructural features after photodynamic therapy

    Qian Peng;Johan Emelian Moan;Jahn M. Nesland

  • Selective distribution of porphyrins in skin thick basal cell carcinoma after topical application of methyl 5-aminolevulinate.

    Qian Peng;Ana Maria Soler;Trond Warloe;Jahn M. Nesland

  • Functional genomics identifies five distinct molecular subtypes with clinical relevance and pathways for growth control in epithelial ovarian cancer

    Tuan Zea Tan;Qing Hao Miow;Ruby Yun Ju Huang;Meng Kang Wong

  • Isolated tumor cells in bone marrow three years after diagnosis in disease-free breast cancer patients predict unfavorable clinical outcome.

    Gro Wiedswang;Elin Borgen;Rolf Kåresen;Hanne Qvist

  • Small cell carcinoma of the cervix. A clinicopathologic study of 26 patients

    Vera M. Abeler;Ruth Holm;Jahn M. Nesland;Kjell E. Kjørstad

  • Constant denaturant gel electrophoresis as a rapid screening technique for p53 mutations.

    Anne Lise Børresen;Eivind Hovig;Birgitte Smith-Sørensen;David Malkin

  • DISTRIBUTION OF 5‐AMINOLEVULINIC ACID‐INDUCED PORPHYRINS IN NODULOULCERATIVE BASAL CELL CARCINOMA

    Qian Peng;Trond Warloe;Johan Moan;Helen Heyerdahl

  • 5-Aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy. Clinical research and future challenges.

    T Warloe;J Nesland;K E Giercksky;M. Kongshaug

Frequent Co-Authors

Claes G. Tropé
Claes G. Tropé University of Oslo
Ben Davidson
Ben Davidson Oslo University Hospital
Gunnar B. Kristensen
Gunnar B. Kristensen Oslo University Hospital
Gunnar Kvalheim
Gunnar Kvalheim Oslo University Hospital
Øystein Fodstad
Øystein Fodstad Oslo University Hospital
Anne Lise Børresen-Dale
Anne Lise Børresen-Dale Oslo University Hospital
Sophie D. Fosså
Sophie D. Fosså Oslo University Hospital
Ragnhild A. Lothe
Ragnhild A. Lothe University of Oslo
Johan Emelian Moan
Johan Emelian Moan University of Oslo
Iris Goldberg
Iris Goldberg Sheba Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative routes in healthcare education is becoming increasingly popular for those interested in medicine. Many students are seeking flexibility through online degrees, which can accelerate their career progression and fit into busy schedules.

For registered nurses who want to advance their qualifications without attending in-person practicums, the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements offer a convenient pathway. Similarly, individuals aiming for leadership positions in nursing can now consider the shortest msn to dnp program to achieve their Doctor of Nursing Practice degree more quickly.

If you're interested in less demanding options, there are resources available that highlight the easiest dnp program reddit, where students share experiences about manageable workloads and flexible schedules. Those looking to start even sooner might consider fast track medical programs, which are designed to quickly prepare students for the workforce.

Whether you're beginning your journey or looking to advance, online degrees and accelerated tracks make medical careers more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Jahn M. Nesland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles