World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
5882
World Ranking
7981
National Ranking
4271

Louis M. French publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis M. French sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Louis M. French D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis M. French sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Louis M. French is affiliated with the United States Army Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research focuses predominantly on medicine, with a specialization in epidemiology, emergency medicine, clinical psychology, neurology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The primary topics covered in their work include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Their recent published papers reflect these areas of study. Selected recent publications include:

  • "A randomized clinical trial of plasticity-based cognitive training in mild traumatic brain injury," 2021, Brain
  • "Posttraumatic Stress Disorder is a Stronger Predictor of Long-Term Neurobehavioral Outcomes Than Traumatic Brain Injury Severity," 2020, Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • "Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Intensive Outpatient Program in Treating Combat-Related Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health Conditions," 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Resilience is associated with health-related quality of life in caregivers of service members and veterans following traumatic brain injury," 2020, Quality of Life Research
  • "Blast traumatic brain injury and serum inflammatory cytokines: a repeated measures case-control study among U.S. military service members," 2020, Journal of Neuroinflammation

The most frequent co-authors collaborating with Louis M. French are:

  • Tracey A. Brickell (73 publications)
  • Rael T. Lange (70 publications)
  • Sara M. Lippa (51 publications)
  • Megan M. Wright (24 publications)
  • Jason M. Bailie (21 publications)

Frequent publication venues where their work appears include:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma (9 publications)
  • Rehabilitation Psychology (7 publications)
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (7 publications)
  • Frontiers in Neurology (5 publications)
  • Quality of Life Research (5 publications)

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research

    Elisabeth A. Wilde;Gale Gibson Whiteneck;Jennifer A. Bogner;Tamara Bushnik

  • Symptom complaints following combat-related traumatic brain injury: relationship to traumatic brain injury severity and posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Heather G. Belanger;Tracy Kretzmer;Rodney D. Vanderploeg;Louis M. French

  • Traumatic brain injuries sustained in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.

    Elisabeth Moy Martin;Wei C. Lu;Katherine Helmick;Louis French

  • A model of attention and its relation to ADHD

    Allan F. Mirsky;Daisy M. Pascualvaca;Connie C. Duncan;Louis M. French

  • Peripheral Total Tau in Military Personnel Who Sustain Traumatic Brain Injuries During Deployment.

    Anlys Olivera;Natasha Lejbman;Andreas Jeromin;Louis M. French

  • Symptom complaints following reports of blast versus non-blast mild TBI: does mechanism of injury matter?

    Heather G. Belanger;Zoe Proctor-Weber;Tracy Kretzmer;Michelle Kim

  • Variable, Not Always Persistent, Postconcussion Symptoms after Mild TBI in U.S. Military Service Members: A Five-Year Cross-Sectional Outcome Study

    Rael T. Lange;Tracey A. Brickell;Brian Ivins;Rodney D. Vanderploeg

  • Influence of poor effort on neuropsychological test performance in U.S. military personnel following mild traumatic brain injury.

    Rael T. Lange;Sonal Pancholi;Aditya Bhagwat;Victoria C. Anderson-Barnes

  • Official Position of the Military TBI Task Force on the Role of Neuropsychology and Rehabilitation Psychology in the Evaluation, Management, and Research of Military Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury

    Michael McCrea;Neil Pliskin;Jeffrey Barth;David Cox

  • Observational study of associations between visual imagery and measures of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress among active-duty military service members with traumatic brain injury at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.

    Girija Kaimal;Melissa S Walker;Joanna Herres;Louis M French

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Incidence, Clinical Overview, and Policies in the US Military Health System Since 2000:

    Thomas M Swanson;Brad M Isaacson;Brad M Isaacson;Cherina M Cyborski;Cherina M Cyborski;Louis M French;Louis M French

  • Subjective cognitive complaints and neuropsychological test performance following military-related traumatic brain injury

    Louis M. French;Rael T. Lange;Tracey A. Brickell

  • Postconcussional disorder and PTSD symptoms of military-related traumatic brain injury associated with compromised neurocircuitry

    Ping-Hong Yeh;Binquan Wang;Terrence R. Oakes;Louis M. French;Louis M. French

  • Cognitive Rehabilitation for Military Service Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Douglas B Cooper;Amy O Bowles;Jan E Kennedy;Glenn Curtiss

  • Case report of a soldier with primary blast brain injury.

    Deborah L. Warden;Louis M. French;Leslie Shupenko;Jamie Fargus

  • Neuropsychological Outcome from Blast versus Non-blast: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in U.S. Military Service Members

    Rael T. Lange;Sonal Pancholi;Tracey A. Brickell;Sara Sakura

  • Assessing and treating veterans with traumatic brain injury.

    Louis M. French;Glenn W. Parkinson

  • Evidence of central and peripheral vestibular pathology in blast-related traumatic brain injury.

    Matthew R. Scherer;Holly Burrows;Robin Pinto;Philip Littlefield

  • Female Service Members and Symptom Reporting after Combat and Non-Combat-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    Tracey A Brickell;Sara M Lippa;Sara M Lippa;Louis M French;Jan E Kennedy;Jan E Kennedy

  • Neuropsychological outcome from uncomplicated mild, complicated mild, and moderate traumatic brain injury in US military personnel.

    Rael T. Lange;Rael T. Lange;Tracey A. Brickell;Louis M. French;Louis M. French;Victoria C. Merritt

  • Clinical utility of the Conners' Continuous Performance Test-II to detect poor effort in U.S. military personnel following traumatic brain injury.

    Rael T. Lange;Grant L. Iverson;Tracey A. Brickell;Tara Staver

  • Traumatic brain injury in the war zone.

    Deborah L Warden;Louis French

Frequent Co-Authors

Rael T. Lange
Rael T. Lange Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Angelle M. Sander
Angelle M. Sander Baylor College of Medicine
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Noelle E. Carlozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robin A. Hanks
Robin A. Hanks Wayne State University
David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
Elizabeth A. Hahn
Elizabeth A. Hahn Northwestern University
Grant L. Iverson
Grant L. Iverson Harvard University
Rodney D. Vanderploeg
Rodney D. Vanderploeg University of South Florida
Terrence R. Oakes
Terrence R. Oakes University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mark Sherer
Mark Sherer Memorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to a variety of fulfilling online degrees and career paths, especially in the field of social work. Social work is a dynamic profession that often seeks graduates with a background in psychology, offering roles in mental health, community outreach, and support services.

Licensure and education requirements vary by state, making it important to be informed before starting your journey. For those interested in practice standards in the Midwest, see the Michigan social work license requirements and Minnesota social work education requirements. Each state provides unique guidelines, so reviewing them is essential before enrolling in an online degree.

If you are considering work in the South, you should also be aware of the Mississippi social work education requirements. For those interested in the Midwest, don’t miss the steps for becoming a social worker in Missouri. By researching these requirements, you can better align your psychology studies with your ideal career path.

Best Scientists Citing Louis M. French

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles