World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 82 1341 1193 805 697 324 21988
Medicine 82 16234 15271 8161 7548 379 22293

Mark W. Bondi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark W. Bondi between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark W. Bondi published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2019. 23 of the 403 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2019. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 9 publications
1990 2025

403 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark W. Bondi: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 3
1994 3
1995 4
1996 2
1997 7
1998 7
1999 5
2000 1
2001 0
2002 5
2003 5
2004 7
2005 11
2006 6
2007 9
2008 6
2009 10
2010 15
2011 11
2012 15
2013 10
2014 17
2015 15
2016 15
2017 20
2018 28
2019 31
2020 29
2021 30
2022 23
2023 26
2024 14
2025 9
Total 403
Download as CSV

Mark W. Bondi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Bondi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 324 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 324
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark W. Bondi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Bondi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112 82
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Mark W. Bondi is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Neurology.

The scientist's work focuses on key topics such as Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances.

Mark W. Bondi's recent publications include:

  • APOE interacts with tau PET to influence memory independently of amyloid PET in older adults without dementia (2020), published in Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Regional hyperperfusion in older adults with objectively-defined subtle cognitive decline (2020), published in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • Priorities for research on neuromodulatory subcortical systems in Alzheimer's disease: Position paper from the NSS PIA of ISTAART (2023), published in Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Patterns of longitudinal cortical atrophy over 3 years in empirically derived MCI subtypes (2020), published in Neurology
  • Association of anticholinergic medications and AD biomarkers with incidence of MCI among cognitively normal older adults (2020), published in Neurology

The most frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark W. Bondi are:

  • Kelsey R. Thomas
  • Alexandra J. Weigand
  • Katherine J. Bangen
  • Lisa Delano-Wood
  • Emily C. Edmonds

Common publication venues for their work include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • Neurology

Mark W. Bondi was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Comparisons of Verbal Fluency Tasks in the Detection of Dementia of the Alzheimer Type

    Andreas U. Monsch;Mark W. Bondi;Nelson Butters;David P. Salmon

  • Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment.

    Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak;Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina Wierenga;Christina Wierenga

  • Neuropsychological Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment Improves Diagnostic Precision, Biomarker Associations, and Progression Rates

    Mark W. Bondi;Emily C. Edmonds;Amy J. Jak;Lindsay R. Clark

  • Alzheimer’s Disease: Past, Present, and Future

    Mark W. Bondi;Emily C. Edmonds;David P. Salmon

  • Neuropsychological Assessment of Dementia

    David P. Salmon;Mark W. Bondi

  • fMRI evidence of compensatory mechanisms in older adults at genetic risk for Alzheimer disease

    Mark W. Bondi;Wes S. Houston;Lisa T. Eyler;Gregory G. Brown

  • Decreased white matter integrity in late-myelinating fiber pathways in Alzheimer's disease supports retrogenesis.

    Nikki H. Stricker;B. C. Schweinsburg;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina E. Wierenga;Christina E. Wierenga

  • A comparison of category and letter fluency in Alzheimer's disease and Huntington's disease.

    Andreas U. Monsch;Mark W. Bondi;Nelson Butters;Jane S. Paulsen

  • Neuropsychological and neuroimaging changes in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

    Elizabeth W. Twamley;Susan A. Legendre Ropacki;Mark W. Bondi

  • Implicit and explicit memory in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

    Mark W. Bondi;Alfred W. Kaszniak

  • Episodic memory changes are associated with the APOE- epsilon 4 allele in nondemented older adults

    Mark W. Bondi;D. P. Salmon;A. U. Monsch;D. Galasko

  • Neuropsychological function and apolipoprotein E genotype in the preclinical detection of Alzheimer's disease.

    Mark W. Bondi;David P. Salmon;Douglas Galasko;Ronald G. Thomas

  • Neuropsychological Contributions to the Early Identification of Alzheimer’s Disease

    Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Amy J. Jak;Lisa Delano-Wood;Mark W. Jacobson

  • Contributions of frontal system dysfunction to memory and perceptual abilities in Parkinson's disease.

    Mark W. Bondi;Alfred W. Kaszniak;Kathryn A. Bayles;Katherine T. Vance

  • Clinical Validity of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale in Detecting Dementia of the Alzheimer Type: A Double Cross-Validation and Application to a Community-Dwelling Sample

    Andreas U. Monsch;Mark W. Bondi;David P. Salmon;Nelson Butters

  • Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors

    Emily C. Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lindsay R. Clark;Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak

  • SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE COMPLAINTS CONTRIBUTE TO MISDIAGNOSIS OF MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

    Emily Edmonds;Lisa Delano-Wood;Douglas Galasko;David Salmon

  • Quantitative evaluation of automated skull-stripping methods applied to contemporary and legacy images: effects of diagnosis, bias correction, and slice location.

    Christine Fennema‐Notestine;I. Burak Ozyurt;I. Burak Ozyurt;Camellia P. Clark;Camellia P. Clark;Shaunna Morris;Shaunna Morris

  • Cognitive and neuropathologic correlates of Stroop Color-Word Test performance in Alzheimer's disease.

    Mark W. Bondi;Adam B. Serody;Agnes S. Chan;Sonja C. Eberson-Shumate

  • Preclinical cognitive markers of dementia of the Alzheimer type.

    Mark W. Bondi;Andreas U. Monsch;Douglas Galasko;Nelson Butters

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa Delano-Wood
Lisa Delano-Wood University of California, San Diego
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Katherine J. Bangen
Katherine J. Bangen University of California, San Diego
Amy J. Jak
Amy J. Jak University of California, San Diego
Emily C. Edmonds
Emily C. Edmonds University of Arizona
Dean C. Delis
Dean C. Delis University of California, San Diego
Christina E. Wierenga
Christina E. Wierenga University of California, San Diego
Douglas Galasko
Douglas Galasko University of California, San Diego
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University
Paul E. Gilbert
Paul E. Gilbert San Diego State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to various online degrees and specialized pathways, such as Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). Each state and city can have unique requirements for aspiring therapists, making research essential for your academic and professional success.

For example, Pittsburgh mft certification requirements emphasize the need for a graduate degree in counseling or a related field, supervised clinical hours, and passing state-recognized exams. Similarly, those interested in therapy careers should look into how to become a marriage and family therapist in Plano, as local regulations and educational steps may differ.

Potential students can also review Port St. Lucie mft education requirements and Portland mft education requirements for insight into specific coursework, supervised internships, and licensing procedures.

As online degrees become increasingly popular, understanding your state’s path to licensure will help you choose the right accredited program and build a career that makes a difference in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Bondi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles