World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maria Grazia Daidone

Maria Grazia Daidone

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
75
Citations
23707
World Ranking
1184
National Ranking
19

Maria Grazia Daidone publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Grazia Daidone sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 365 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Maria Grazia Daidone D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Grazia Daidone sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maria Grazia Daidone is affiliated with the University of Milan in Italy and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their body of work prominently addresses subfields such as Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

The researcher's primary topics of focus include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Cancer Cells and Metastasis, HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research, Genetic Factors in Colorectal Cancer, COVID-19 and Healthcare Impacts, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers.

Maria Grazia Daidone has published research in numerous respected scientific venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Cancer Research
  • Cancers
  • Annals of Oncology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin

Frequent collaborators in their research include Serena Di Cosimo, Paolo Verderio, Vera Cappelletti, Chiara Maura Ciniselli, and Giancarlo Pruneri.

Significant recent publications by Maria Grazia Daidone cover various aspects of cancer biology and diagnostics. These include:

  • Basic principles of biobanking: from biological samples to precision medicine for patients, 2021, Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • Contrasting DCIS and invasive breast cancer by subtype suggests basal-like DCIS as distinct lesions, 2020, npj Breast Cancer
  • Gene signatures of circulating breast cancer cell models are a source of novel molecular determinants of metastasis and improve circulating tumor cell detection in patients, 2022, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
  • Blood-based genomics of triple-negative breast cancer progression in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 2021, ESMO Open
  • Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters Are Frequently Detected in Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2021, Cancers

Best Publications

  • Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties.

    Dario Ponti;Aurora Costa;Nadia Zaffaroni;Graziella Pratesi

  • The Hippo Transducer TAZ Confers Cancer Stem Cell-Related Traits on Breast Cancer Cells

    Michelangelo Cordenonsi;Francesca Zanconato;Luca Azzolin;Mattia Forcato

  • Gene Expression in Fixed Tissues and Outcome in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Yujin Hoshida;Augusto Villanueva;Masahiro Kobayashi;Judit Peix

  • Human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells do not undergo transformation after long-term in vitro culture and do not exhibit telomere maintenance mechanisms.

    Maria Ester Bernardo;Nadia Zaffaroni;Francesca Novara;Angela Maria Cometa

  • A MicroRNA targeting dicer for metastasis control.

    Graziano Martello;Antonio Rosato;Francesco Ferrari;Andrea Manfrin

  • The Bcl-2 Protein: a Prognostic Indicator Strongly Related to p53 Protein in Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients

    Rosella Silvestrini;Silvia Veneroni;Maria Grazia Daidone;Elvira Benini

  • Predicting prognosis using molecular profiling in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen.

    Sherene Loi;Benjamin Haibe-Kains;Christine Desmedt;Pratyaksha Wirapati

  • Rational design of shepherdin, a novel anticancer agent

    Janet Plescia;Whitney Salz;Fang Xia;Marzia Pennati

  • Expression of the anti-apoptotic gene survivin correlates with taxol resistance in human ovarian cancer.

    N. Zaffaroni;M. Pennati;G. Colella;P. Perego

  • Survivin as a target for new anticancer interventions

    Nadia Zaffaroni;Marzia Pennati;Maria Grazia Daidone

  • p53 as an Independent Prognostic Marker in Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients

    R. Silvestrini;E. Benini;M. G. Daidone;S. Veneroni

  • Survivin expression and resistance to anticancer treatments: perspectives for new therapeutic interventions

    Nadia Zaffaroni;Maria Grazia Daidone

  • Different genetic features associated with colon and rectal carcinogenesis.

    Milo Frattini;Debora Balestra;Simona Suardi;Maria Oggionni

  • Exosome-mediated delivery of miR-9 induces cancer-associated fibroblast-like properties in human breast fibroblasts.

    Unknown

  • Challenges in using circulating miRNAs as cancer biomarkers.

    Unknown

  • Cell kinetics as a prognostic marker in node-negative breast cancer.

    Unknown

  • Breast cancer stem cells: an overview.

    Dario Ponti;Nadia Zaffaroni;Chiara Capelli;Maria Grazia Daidone

  • p53 and bcl-2 expression correlates with clinical outcome in a series of node-positive breast cancer patients.

    Unknown

  • Telomere Maintenance Mechanisms in Liposarcomas: Association with Histologic Subtypes and Disease Progression

    Aurora Costa;Maria Grazia Daidone;Laura Daprai;Raffaella Villa

  • Tumor-extracellular matrix interactions: Identification of tools associated with breast cancer progression

    Marta Giussani;Giuseppe Merlino;Vera Cappelletti;Elda Tagliabue

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadia Zaffaroni
Nadia Zaffaroni University of Milan
Luigi Mariani
Luigi Mariani University Hospital of Basel
Marco A. Pierotti
Marco A. Pierotti University of Bari Aldo Moro
Filippo de Braud
Filippo de Braud University of Milan
Silvana Pilotti
Silvana Pilotti University of Milan
Giancarlo Pruneri
Giancarlo Pruneri University of Milan
Silvana Canevari
Silvana Canevari University of Milan
Elda Tagliabue
Elda Tagliabue Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Angelo Paradiso
Angelo Paradiso National Cancer Research Institute, UK
Umberto Veronesi
Umberto Veronesi European Institute of Oncology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Molecular Biology opens up diverse options for further study and career progression in the biological and health sciences. Many students choose to enhance their qualifications with flexible online programs. For those interested in the nursing path, it’s worth considering msn direct entry programs online, especially if you’re a non-nurse looking to pivot into advanced practice roles.

Online programs can vary significantly in flexibility, affordability, and reputation. For instance, prospective nurses often compare capella university vs wgu rn to bsn programs to determine which school aligns with their learning style and career goals. Similarly, for registered nurses seeking advancement, bsn to msn online programs provide bridges to leadership positions in healthcare.

When selecting an online degree, it’s crucial to choose accredited schools. Reviewing the nonprofit online universities can help ensure your program is both reputable and cost-effective, setting a strong foundation for your future career.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Grazia Daidone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles