World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
19750
World Ranking
17273
National Ranking
237

José Remohí publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Remohí sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 297 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

José Remohí D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Remohí sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

José Remohí is affiliated with the University of Valencia in Spain and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, and related subfields such as Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Their work covers multiple topics within reproductive sciences including Reproductive Biology and Fertility, Ovarian function and disorders, Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy, Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics, Endometriosis Research and Treatment, Sperm and Testicular Function, and Reproductive Health and Technologies.

Recent publications by José Remohí include:

  • Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation for both medical and nonmedical reasons (2021) published in Fertility and Sterility
  • Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: an observational study (2020) published in Fertility and Sterility
  • Novel and conventional embryo parameters as input data for artificial neural networks: an artificial intelligence model applied for prediction of the implantation potential (2020) published in Fertility and Sterility
  • The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratories (2022) published in Human Reproduction
  • Number needed to freeze: cumulative live birth rate after fertility preservation in women with endometriosis (2021) published in Reproductive BioMedicine Online

José Remohí frequently collaborates with several co-authors, among whom prominent colleagues include Marcos Meseguer, Lorena Bori, Ana Cobo, António Pellicer, and Juan Gilés.

Their research has been published in multiple venues, with notable recurring contributions to:

  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Human Reproduction
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation

    Marcos Meseguer;Javier Herrero;Alberto Tejera;Karen Marie Hilligsøe

  • Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies.

    F Raga;C Bauset;J Remohi;F Bonilla-Musoles

  • Evidence That the Endometrial Microbiota Has an Effect on Implantation Success or Failure

    Inmaculada Moreno;Francisco M. Codoñer;Felipe Vilella;Diana Valbuena

  • Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method.

    Ana Cobo;Masashigue Kuwayama;Sonia Pérez;Amparo Ruiz

  • Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial

    Ana Cobo;Marcos Meseguer;José Remohí;Antonio Pellicer

  • Circulating Progesterone Levels and Ongoing Pregnancy Rates in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Cycles for In Vitro Fertilization: Analysis of Over 4000 Cycles

    E. Bosch;E. Labarta;J. Crespo;C. Simón

  • Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation

    Ana Cobo;Juan A. García-Velasco;Aila Coello;Javier Domingo

  • Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in-vitro fertilization and oocyte donation.

    C. Simón;A. Gutiérrez;A. Vidal;M.J. de los Santos

  • Premature luteinization during gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles and its relationship with in vitro fertilization outcome

    Ernesto Bosch;Iván Valencia;Ernesto Escudero;Juana Crespo

  • Female obesity impairs in vitro fertilization outcome without affecting embryo quality.

    José Bellver;Yanira Ayllón;Marcos Ferrando;Marco Melo

  • Human Endometrial Mucin MUC1 Is Up-Regulated by Progesterone and Down-Regulated In Vitro by the Human Blastocyst

    M Meseguer;J D Aplin;P Caballero-Campo;J E O'Connor

  • Obesity and poor reproductive outcome: the potential role of the endometrium

    José Bellver;Marco A.B. Melo;Ernesto Bosch;Vicente Serra

  • Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples

    C. Rubio;C. Simón;F. Vidal;L. Rodrigo

  • In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study

    Carmen Rubio;José Bellver;Lorena Rodrigo;Gema Castillón

  • Obesity and the risk of spontaneous abortion after oocyte donation

    José Bellver;Luis P Rossal;Ernesto Bosch;Andrés Zúñiga

  • Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study

    Laura Rienzi;Ana Cobo;Alessio Paffoni;Claudia Scarduelli

  • Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes.

    A Cobo;J García-Velasco;J Domingo;A Pellicer

  • Autologous cell therapy with CD133+ bone marrow-derived stem cells for refractory Asherman's syndrome and endometrial atrophy: a pilot cohort study

    Xavier Santamaria;Sergio Cabanillas;Irene Cervelló;Cristina Arbona

  • Embryonic Regulation of Integrins β3,α 4, and α1 in Human Endometrial Epithelial Cells in Vitro1

    Carlos Simón;MarÍa José Gimeno;Amparo Mercader;José Enrique O’Connor

  • Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles

    Ana Cobo;María José de los Santos;Damià Castellò;Pilar Gámiz

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Pellicer
Antonio Pellicer University of Valencia
Marcos Meseguer
Marcos Meseguer University of Valencia
Carlos Simón
Carlos Simón University of Valencia
José-Enrique O'Connor
José-Enrique O'Connor University of Valencia
Thomas D'Hooghe
Thomas D'Hooghe Yale University
Zev Rosenwaks
Zev Rosenwaks Cornell University
John D. Aplin
John D. Aplin University of Manchester
Christophe Arnoult
Christophe Arnoult Grenoble Alpes University
Pierre F. Ray
Pierre F. Ray Grenoble Alpes University
J. Egozcue
J. Egozcue Autonomous University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways that offer flexibility and diverse opportunities. Many students enter healthcare careers through alternative routes. For example, the best medical billing and coding schools online allow you to gain in-demand administrative skills with financial aid options, making it accessible for many learners.

Nursing remains a popular pathway. However, do all nursing schools require the teas? Not necessarily. Some nursing schools have options that do not require the TEAS or HESI exams, making entry more manageable for eligible students.

For those interested in leadership roles, an online healthcare management degree can quickly prepare you for supervisory positions in hospitals, clinics, or insurance firms. If you’re already a registered nurse, you can advance your qualifications through adn to np programs online, bridging directly to nurse practitioner roles.

Best Scientists Citing José Remohí

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles