World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
28223
World Ranking
12720
National Ranking
681

Klaus Diedrich publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Diedrich sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 985 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Klaus Diedrich D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Diedrich sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Gynaecology and Paediatrics

Overview

Klaus Diedrich is affiliated with the University of Lübeck in Germany. Their research spans interdisciplinary fields including medicine and engineering, with a focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, surgery, biomedical engineering, safety, risk, reliability and quality, as well as statistics, probability and uncertainty.

The scientist's recent publications cover various topics related to surgical simulation, medical education, anatomy, medical technology, nuclear studies, and risk analysis. Notable papers include:

  • Training of young medical professionals: implementation of modern training concepts, taking into account the changed framework conditions for training-a pilot project for operational subjects (2024, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics)
  • Facharzt-Training Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe (2020, Der Gynäkologe)
  • Applicability of multi-criteria decision analysis in the site selection procedure for high-level radioactive waste final disposal: robustness-oriented comparison of emplacement concepts (2023, Safety of Nuclear Waste Disposal)

Frequent co-authors contributing to these works include Sebastian Findeklee, Bashar Haj Hamoud, Romina-Marina Sima, Erich-Franz Solomayer, and Carolin Spüntrup.

Publication venues where their research appears regularly are:

  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
  • Der Gynäkologe
  • Safety of Nuclear Waste Disposal

The scientist's main research themes are reflected in topics such as:

  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Nuclear and radioactivity studies
  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Risk Perception and Management

Klaus Diedrich received recognition from the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina for their contributions in Gynaecology and Paediatrics in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2–3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial

    RC Coombes;LS Kilburn;CF Snowdon;R Paridaens

  • Fertility and ageing.

    D T Baird;J Collins;J Egozcue;L H Evers

  • Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome

    B. C. Tarlatzis;B. C.J.M. Fauser;R. S. Legro;R. J. Norman

  • Contemporary genetic technologies and female reproduction

    B.C.J.M. Fauser;K. Diedrich;P. Bouchard;F. Domínguez

  • Multiple gestation pregnancy

    Andre Van Steirteghem;Ingeborg Liebaers;R.g. Edwards;Dt. Baird

  • Ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin

    Carola Albano;R.e. Felberbaum;Johan Smitz;H. Riethmüller-Winzen

  • Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation

    K. Diedrich;C. Diedrich;E. Santos;C. Zoll

  • A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists

    E.M. Kolibianakis;A. Schultze-Mosgau;A. Schroer;A. van Steirteghem

  • Nonsupplemented Luteal Phase Characteristics after the Administration of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone, or Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist to Induce Final Oocyte Maturation in in Vitro Fertilization Patients after Ovarian Stimulation with Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and GnRH Antagonist Cotreatment

    Nicole G. M. Beckers;Nicholas S. Macklon;Marinus J. Eijkemans;Michael Ludwig

  • The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation

    Klaus Diedrich;B. C.J.M. Fauser;P. Devroey;G. Griesinger

  • Cryopreservation of human oocytes

    S. Al-Hasani;K. Diedrich;H. van der Ven;A. Reinecke

  • GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    G. Griesinger;Klaus Diedrich;Paul Devroey;Efstratios Kolibianakis

  • Over-expression of wild-type Rad51 correlates with histological grading of invasive ductal breast cancer.

    Heiko Maacke;Sven Opitz;Kirsten Jost;Willem Hamdorf

  • Among patients treated for IVF with gonadotrophins and GnRH analogues, is the probability of live birth dependent on the type of analogue used? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    E.M. Kolibianakis;J. Collins;B.C. Tarlatzis;P. Devroey

  • GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF

    B C Tarlatzis;B C Fauser;E M Kolibianakis;K Diedrich

  • Is Endometriosis Associated with Systemic Subclinical Inflammation

    Admir Agic;Hong Xu;Dominique Finas;Constanze Banz

  • Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss

    W. Dondorp;G. de Wert;G. Pennings;F. Shenfield

  • Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation

    B. C. J. M. Fauser;K. Diedrich;P. Devroey

  • Addition of growth hormone to gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation of poor responders treated by in-vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    E.M. Kolibianakis;C.A. Venetis;K. Diedrich;B.C. Tarlatzis

  • GnRH-antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with poor response to gonadotrophins, polycystic ovary syndrome, and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis

    G Griesinger;K Diedrich;BC Tarlatzis;EM Kolibianakis

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W. Friedrich
Michael W. Friedrich University of Bremen
Alexander Katalinic
Alexander Katalinic University of Lübeck
Basil C. Tarlatzis
Basil C. Tarlatzis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Eberhard Schwinger
Eberhard Schwinger University of Lübeck
Paul Devroey
Paul Devroey Vrije Universiteit Brussel
A. Van Steirteghem
A. Van Steirteghem Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Nadia Harbeck
Nadia Harbeck Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Bart C.J.M. Fauser
Bart C.J.M. Fauser Utrecht University
Andreas Schneeweiss
Andreas Schneeweiss German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees in the healthcare field can be a smart way to begin or advance your medical career. For registered nurses seeking to enhance their qualifications, the rn to bsn cheapest programs offer a flexible and affordable route to earning a bachelor's degree in nursing.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor's degree and wish to transition into the nursing field, there are online msn programs for non nurses that cater specifically to career changers, allowing you to obtain a master’s degree efficiently.

For those concerned about program competitiveness, you might find easy nursing schools to get into, offering more accessible entry requirements for aspiring nurses.

Not all healthcare careers require years of medical training — roles such as medical billing and coding are also in high demand. You can find reputable online medical billing and coding with financial aid programs, which provide the flexibility to study while managing other responsibilities.

By considering these diverse online degree and certificate options, you can find a path that best fits your goals and circumstances in the rapidly growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Diedrich

Trending Scientists