World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12719 11973 682 658 985 28223

Klaus Diedrich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Klaus Diedrich between 1977 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Klaus Diedrich published across 48 years, from 1977 to 2024, averaging 22.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 103 publications in 2009. 2 of the 1,067 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 103. Peak 103 publications in 2009. 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 13 publications 1989: 18 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 24 publications 1997: 32 publications 1998: 28 publications 1999: 46 publications 2000: 49 publications 2001: 31 publications 2002: 52 publications 2003: 63 publications 2004: 53 publications 2005: 68 publications 2006: 75 publications 2007: 52 publications 2008: 50 publications 2009: 103 publications 2010: 51 publications 2011: 60 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1977 2024

1,067 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Klaus Diedrich: publications per year, 1977 to 2024
Year Publications
1977 2
1978 1
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 3
1984 7
1985 6
1986 7
1987 10
1988 13
1989 18
1990 13
1991 8
1992 8
1993 5
1994 8
1995 17
1996 24
1997 32
1998 28
1999 46
2000 49
2001 31
2002 52
2003 63
2004 53
2005 68
2006 75
2007 52
2008 50
2009 103
2010 51
2011 60
2012 28
2013 15
2014 8
2015 1
2016 4
2017 5
2018 8
2019 6
2020 16
2021 8
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
Total 1,067
Download as CSV

Klaus Diedrich publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Diedrich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 981–1,000 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 985 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96 985
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Klaus Diedrich D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Diedrich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Gynaecology and Paediatrics

Overview

Klaus Diedrich is affiliated with the University of Lübeck in Germany. Their research spans interdisciplinary fields including medicine and engineering, with a focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, surgery, biomedical engineering, safety, risk, reliability and quality, as well as statistics, probability and uncertainty.

The scientist's recent publications cover various topics related to surgical simulation, medical education, anatomy, medical technology, nuclear studies, and risk analysis. Notable papers include:

  • Training of young medical professionals: implementation of modern training concepts, taking into account the changed framework conditions for training-a pilot project for operational subjects (2024, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics)
  • Facharzt-Training Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe (2020, Der Gynäkologe)
  • Applicability of multi-criteria decision analysis in the site selection procedure for high-level radioactive waste final disposal: robustness-oriented comparison of emplacement concepts (2023, Safety of Nuclear Waste Disposal)

Frequent co-authors contributing to these works include Sebastian Findeklee, Bashar Haj Hamoud, Romina-Marina Sima, Erich-Franz Solomayer, and Carolin Spüntrup.

Publication venues where their research appears regularly are:

  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
  • Der Gynäkologe
  • Safety of Nuclear Waste Disposal

The scientist's main research themes are reflected in topics such as:

  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Nuclear and radioactivity studies
  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Risk Perception and Management

Klaus Diedrich received recognition from the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina for their contributions in Gynaecology and Paediatrics in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2–3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial

    RC Coombes;LS Kilburn;CF Snowdon;R Paridaens

  • Fertility and ageing.

    D T Baird;J Collins;J Egozcue;L H Evers

  • Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome

    B. C. Tarlatzis;B. C.J.M. Fauser;R. S. Legro;R. J. Norman

  • Contemporary genetic technologies and female reproduction

    B.C.J.M. Fauser;K. Diedrich;P. Bouchard;F. Domínguez

  • Multiple gestation pregnancy

    Andre Van Steirteghem;Ingeborg Liebaers;R.g. Edwards;Dt. Baird

  • Ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin

    Carola Albano;R.e. Felberbaum;Johan Smitz;H. Riethmüller-Winzen

  • Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation

    K. Diedrich;C. Diedrich;E. Santos;C. Zoll

  • A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists

    E.M. Kolibianakis;A. Schultze-Mosgau;A. Schroer;A. van Steirteghem

  • Nonsupplemented Luteal Phase Characteristics after the Administration of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone, or Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist to Induce Final Oocyte Maturation in in Vitro Fertilization Patients after Ovarian Stimulation with Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and GnRH Antagonist Cotreatment

    Nicole G. M. Beckers;Nicholas S. Macklon;Marinus J. Eijkemans;Michael Ludwig

  • The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation

    Klaus Diedrich;B. C.J.M. Fauser;P. Devroey;G. Griesinger

  • Cryopreservation of human oocytes

    S. Al-Hasani;K. Diedrich;H. van der Ven;A. Reinecke

  • GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    G. Griesinger;Klaus Diedrich;Paul Devroey;Efstratios Kolibianakis

  • Over-expression of wild-type Rad51 correlates with histological grading of invasive ductal breast cancer.

    Heiko Maacke;Sven Opitz;Kirsten Jost;Willem Hamdorf

  • Among patients treated for IVF with gonadotrophins and GnRH analogues, is the probability of live birth dependent on the type of analogue used? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    E.M. Kolibianakis;J. Collins;B.C. Tarlatzis;P. Devroey

  • GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF

    B C Tarlatzis;B C Fauser;E M Kolibianakis;K Diedrich

  • Is Endometriosis Associated with Systemic Subclinical Inflammation

    Admir Agic;Hong Xu;Dominique Finas;Constanze Banz

  • Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss

    W. Dondorp;G. de Wert;G. Pennings;F. Shenfield

  • Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation

    B. C. J. M. Fauser;K. Diedrich;P. Devroey

  • Addition of growth hormone to gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation of poor responders treated by in-vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    E.M. Kolibianakis;C.A. Venetis;K. Diedrich;B.C. Tarlatzis

  • GnRH-antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with poor response to gonadotrophins, polycystic ovary syndrome, and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis

    G Griesinger;K Diedrich;BC Tarlatzis;EM Kolibianakis

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W. Friedrich
Michael W. Friedrich University of Bremen
Alexander Katalinic
Alexander Katalinic University of Lübeck
Basil C. Tarlatzis
Basil C. Tarlatzis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Eberhard Schwinger
Eberhard Schwinger University of Lübeck
Paul Devroey
Paul Devroey Vrije Universiteit Brussel
A. Van Steirteghem
A. Van Steirteghem Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Nadia Harbeck
Nadia Harbeck Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Bart C.J.M. Fauser
Bart C.J.M. Fauser Utrecht University
Andreas Schneeweiss
Andreas Schneeweiss German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees in the healthcare field can be a smart way to begin or advance your medical career. For registered nurses seeking to enhance their qualifications, the rn to bsn cheapest programs offer a flexible and affordable route to earning a bachelor's degree in nursing.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor's degree and wish to transition into the nursing field, there are online msn programs for non nurses that cater specifically to career changers, allowing you to obtain a master’s degree efficiently.

For those concerned about program competitiveness, you might find easy nursing schools to get into, offering more accessible entry requirements for aspiring nurses.

Not all healthcare careers require years of medical training — roles such as medical billing and coding are also in high demand. You can find reputable online medical billing and coding with financial aid programs, which provide the flexibility to study while managing other responsibilities.

By considering these diverse online degree and certificate options, you can find a path that best fits your goals and circumstances in the rapidly growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Diedrich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles