World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonio Lasalvia

Antonio Lasalvia

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3160 2904 34 32 276 9209

Antonio Lasalvia publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antonio Lasalvia between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antonio Lasalvia published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 28 of the 312 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2021. 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 11 publications
1993 2025

312 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antonio Lasalvia: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 3
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 4
2000 11
2001 2
2002 5
2003 3
2004 7
2005 5
2006 4
2007 12
2008 18
2009 8
2010 7
2011 13
2012 15
2013 10
2014 12
2015 17
2016 4
2017 9
2018 12
2019 16
2020 17
2021 30
2022 20
2023 19
2024 17
2025 11
Total 312
Download as CSV

Antonio Lasalvia publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Lasalvia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 274–283 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 276 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138 276
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Antonio Lasalvia D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Lasalvia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Antonio Lasalvia is affiliated with the University of Verona in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and medicine, with significant contributions in the subfields of clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, general health professions, and genetics.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health treatment and access, bipolar disorder and treatment, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, genetic associations and epidemiology, COVID-19 and mental health, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Frequent publication venues for Antonio Lasalvia include:

  • Psychological Medicine
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Antonio Lasalvia has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Sarah Tosato
  • Charlotte Gayer-Anderson
  • Marta Di Forti
  • Caterina La Cascia
  • Robin Murray

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Antonio Lasalvia include:

  • Levels of burn-out among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated factors: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital of a highly burdened area of north-east Italy (2021), BMJ Open
  • Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in a highly burdened area of north-east Italy (2020), Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
  • Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for care? (2020), International Journal of Mental Health Systems (authored by Marco Colizzi)
  • Social disadvantage, linguistic distance, ethnic minority status and first-episode psychosis: results from the EU-GEI case-control study (2020), Psychological Medicine (authored by Hannah E. Jongsma)
  • Should we be concerned about stigma and discrimination in people at risk for psychosis? A systematic review (2020), Psychological Medicine (authored by Marco Colizzi)

Best Publications

  • Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey

    Antonio Lasalvia;Silvia Zoppei;Tine Van Bortel;Chiara Bonetto

  • Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Contemporary Challenges for Integrated, Large-scale Investigations

    Jim van Os;Jim van Os;Bart P. Rutten;Inez Myin-Germeys;Philippe Delespaul

  • Treated Incidence of Psychotic Disorders in the Multinational EU-GEI Study.

    Hannah Jongsma;Charlotte Gayer-Anderson;Antonio Lasalvia;Diego Quattrone

  • Influence of perceived organisational factors on job burnout: survey of community mental health staff

    Antonio Lasalvia;Chiara Bonetto;Mariaelena Bertani;Sarah Bissoli

  • Levels of burn-out among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated factors: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital of a highly burdened area of north-east Italy.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Francesco Amaddeo;Stefano Porru;Angela Carta

  • Caregiving in schizophrenia: development, internal consistency and reliability of the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire – European Version: EPSILON Study 4

    Bob van Wijngaarden;Aart H. Schene;Maarten Koeter;José Luis Vázquez-Barquero

  • Severe and persistent mental illness: a useful definition for prioritizing community-based mental health service interventions

    Alberto Parabiaghi;Chiara Bonetto;Mirella Ruggeri;Antonio Lasalvia

  • The state of the art in European research on reducing social exclusion and stigma related to mental health: A systematic mapping of the literature

    S. Evans-Lacko;E. Courtin;A. Fiorillo;M. Knapp

  • Reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need - European Version. EPSILON Study 6

    McCrone P;Leese M;Thornicroft G;Schene Ah

  • Development, internal consistency and reliability of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale - European Version: EPSILON Study 7

    M Ruggeri;A Lasalvia;R Dall'Agnola;B van Wijngaarden

  • Satisfaction with mental health services among people with schizophrenia in five European sites: Results from the EPSILON study

    Mirella Ruggeri;Antonio Lasalvia;Giulia Bisoffi;Graham Thornicroft

  • Changes and predictors of change in objective and subjective quality of life: multiwave follow-up study in community psychiatric practice.

    Mirella Ruggeri;Michela Nosè;Chiara Bonetto;Doriana Cristofalo

  • Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Multi-Element Psychosocial Intervention for First-Episode Psychosis: Results From the Cluster-Randomized Controlled GET UP PIANO Trial in a Catchment Area of 10 Million Inhabitants

    Mirella Ruggeri;Chiara Bonetto;Antonio Lasalvia;Angelo Fioritti

  • The perception of needs for care in staff and patients in community-based mental health services. The South-Verona Outcome Project 3.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Mirella Ruggeri;Maria Angela Mazzi;Rosa Bruna Dall'Agnola

  • Listening to patients' needs to improve their subjective quality of life.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Chiara Bonetto;Francesca Malchiodi;Giovanni Salvi

  • Subjective quality of life: its relationship with clinician-rated and patient-rated psychopathology. The South-Verona Outcome Project 6.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Mirella Ruggeri;Nazario Santolini

  • Should the label "schizophrenia" be abandoned?

    Antonio Lasalvia;Elena Penta;Norman Sartorius;Scott Henderson

  • Psychosocial variables associated with mental adjustment to cancer

    Luigi Grassi;Giovanni Rosti;Antonio Lasalvia;Maurizio Marangolo

  • People with schizophrenia in five countries: Conceptual similarities and intercultural differences in family caregiving

    Bob Van Wijngaarden;Aart Schene;Maarten Koeter;Thomas Becker

Frequent Co-Authors

Chiara Bonetto
Chiara Bonetto University of Verona
Michele Tansella
Michele Tansella University of Verona
Paolo Brambilla
Paolo Brambilla University of Milan
Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Robin M. Murray
Robin M. Murray King's College London
Eva Velthorst
Eva Velthorst Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Marta Di Forti
Marta Di Forti King's College London
James B. Kirkbride
James B. Kirkbride University College London
Pierre-Michel Llorca
Pierre-Michel Llorca University of Clermont Auvergne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities often opens doors to versatile academic and career routes. Today, many students are choosing online degrees for flexibility, affordability, and speed. Programs like the affordable online psychology masters provide a cost-effective pathway to advanced qualifications, especially for those interested in careers such as counseling or HR.

For those aiming for leadership roles in education, the fastest edd program online allows motivated learners to earn their doctorate in less time than traditional on-campus routes.

If you want to minimize time spent studying, there are 1 year masters programs available in areas like communication, public policy, and cultural studies—helping you upskill rapidly.

Even at the undergraduate level, accelerated degree programs online can fast-track your entry into the workforce or graduate study. Choosing the right online program can provide valuable flexibility for working adults or those seeking a career change.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Lasalvia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles