World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonio Lasalvia

Antonio Lasalvia

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
9209
World Ranking
3160
National Ranking
34

Antonio Lasalvia publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Lasalvia sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 276 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Antonio Lasalvia D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Lasalvia sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonio Lasalvia is affiliated with the University of Verona in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and medicine, with significant contributions in the subfields of clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, general health professions, and genetics.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health treatment and access, bipolar disorder and treatment, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, genetic associations and epidemiology, COVID-19 and mental health, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Frequent publication venues for Antonio Lasalvia include:

  • Psychological Medicine
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Antonio Lasalvia has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Sarah Tosato
  • Charlotte Gayer-Anderson
  • Marta Di Forti
  • Caterina La Cascia
  • Robin Murray

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Antonio Lasalvia include:

  • Levels of burn-out among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated factors: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital of a highly burdened area of north-east Italy (2021), BMJ Open
  • Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in a highly burdened area of north-east Italy (2020), Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
  • Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for care? (2020), International Journal of Mental Health Systems (authored by Marco Colizzi)
  • Social disadvantage, linguistic distance, ethnic minority status and first-episode psychosis: results from the EU-GEI case-control study (2020), Psychological Medicine (authored by Hannah E. Jongsma)
  • Should we be concerned about stigma and discrimination in people at risk for psychosis? A systematic review (2020), Psychological Medicine (authored by Marco Colizzi)

Best Publications

  • Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey

    Antonio Lasalvia;Silvia Zoppei;Tine Van Bortel;Chiara Bonetto

  • Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for care?

    Marco Colizzi;Marco Colizzi;Antonio Lasalvia;Mirella Ruggeri

  • Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Contemporary Challenges for Integrated, Large-scale Investigations

    Jim van Os;Jim van Os;Bart P. Rutten;Inez Myin-Germeys;Philippe Delespaul

  • Treated Incidence of Psychotic Disorders in the Multinational EU-GEI Study.

    Hannah Jongsma;Charlotte Gayer-Anderson;Antonio Lasalvia;Diego Quattrone

  • Influence of perceived organisational factors on job burnout: survey of community mental health staff

    Antonio Lasalvia;Chiara Bonetto;Mariaelena Bertani;Sarah Bissoli

  • Levels of burn-out among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated factors: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital of a highly burdened area of north-east Italy.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Francesco Amaddeo;Stefano Porru;Angela Carta

  • Caregiving in schizophrenia: development, internal consistency and reliability of the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire – European Version: EPSILON Study 4

    Bob van Wijngaarden;Aart H. Schene;Maarten Koeter;José Luis Vázquez-Barquero

  • Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in a highly burdened area of north-east Italy.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Chiara Bonetto;Stefano Porru;Angela Carta

  • Severe and persistent mental illness: a useful definition for prioritizing community-based mental health service interventions

    Alberto Parabiaghi;Chiara Bonetto;Mirella Ruggeri;Antonio Lasalvia

  • The state of the art in European research on reducing social exclusion and stigma related to mental health: A systematic mapping of the literature

    S. Evans-Lacko;E. Courtin;A. Fiorillo;M. Knapp

  • Reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need - European Version. EPSILON Study 6

    McCrone P;Leese M;Thornicroft G;Schene Ah

  • Development, internal consistency and reliability of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale - European Version: EPSILON Study 7

    M Ruggeri;A Lasalvia;R Dall'Agnola;B van Wijngaarden

  • Satisfaction with mental health services among people with schizophrenia in five European sites: Results from the EPSILON study

    Mirella Ruggeri;Antonio Lasalvia;Giulia Bisoffi;Graham Thornicroft

  • Changes and predictors of change in objective and subjective quality of life: multiwave follow-up study in community psychiatric practice.

    Mirella Ruggeri;Michela Nosè;Chiara Bonetto;Doriana Cristofalo

  • Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Multi-Element Psychosocial Intervention for First-Episode Psychosis: Results From the Cluster-Randomized Controlled GET UP PIANO Trial in a Catchment Area of 10 Million Inhabitants

    Mirella Ruggeri;Chiara Bonetto;Antonio Lasalvia;Angelo Fioritti

  • The perception of needs for care in staff and patients in community-based mental health services. The South-Verona Outcome Project 3.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Mirella Ruggeri;Maria Angela Mazzi;Rosa Bruna Dall'Agnola

  • Listening to patients' needs to improve their subjective quality of life.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Chiara Bonetto;Francesca Malchiodi;Giovanni Salvi

  • Subjective quality of life: its relationship with clinician-rated and patient-rated psychopathology. The South-Verona Outcome Project 6.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Mirella Ruggeri;Nazario Santolini

  • Should the label "schizophrenia" be abandoned?

    Antonio Lasalvia;Elena Penta;Norman Sartorius;Scott Henderson

  • Psychosocial variables associated with mental adjustment to cancer

    Luigi Grassi;Giovanni Rosti;Antonio Lasalvia;Maurizio Marangolo

  • People with schizophrenia in five countries: Conceptual similarities and intercultural differences in family caregiving

    Bob Van Wijngaarden;Aart Schene;Maarten Koeter;Thomas Becker

Frequent Co-Authors

Chiara Bonetto
Chiara Bonetto University of Verona
Michele Tansella
Michele Tansella University of Verona
Paolo Brambilla
Paolo Brambilla University of Milan
Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Robin M. Murray
Robin M. Murray King's College London
Eva Velthorst
Eva Velthorst Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Marta Di Forti
Marta Di Forti King's College London
James B. Kirkbride
James B. Kirkbride University College London
Pierre-Michel Llorca
Pierre-Michel Llorca University of Clermont Auvergne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities often opens doors to versatile academic and career routes. Today, many students are choosing online degrees for flexibility, affordability, and speed. Programs like the affordable online psychology masters provide a cost-effective pathway to advanced qualifications, especially for those interested in careers such as counseling or HR.

For those aiming for leadership roles in education, the fastest edd program online allows motivated learners to earn their doctorate in less time than traditional on-campus routes.

If you want to minimize time spent studying, there are 1 year masters programs available in areas like communication, public policy, and cultural studies—helping you upskill rapidly.

Even at the undergraduate level, accelerated degree programs online can fast-track your entry into the workforce or graduate study. Choosing the right online program can provide valuable flexibility for working adults or those seeking a career change.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Lasalvia

Trending Scientists