World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
30486
World Ranking
13566
National Ranking
1262

Mike Slade publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Slade sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 379 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mike Slade D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Slade sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mike Slade is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans Health Professions and Psychology, with a focus on the subfields of General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Social Psychology, and Philosophy.

Their work centers on key topics including Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Mental Health Treatment and Access, Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, Mental Health and Psychiatry, Family Caregiving in Mental Illness, Psychiatric Care and Mental Health Services, and Homelessness and Social Issues.

Recent publications by Mike Slade include:

  • Personal Recovery in People With a Psychotic Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Associated Factors (2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • Peer support for people with severe mental illness versus usual care in high-, middle- and low-income countries: study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (UPSIDES-RCT) (2020, Trials)
  • Uses and Misuses of Recorded Mental Health Lived Experience Narratives in Healthcare and Community Settings: Systematic Review (2021, Schizophrenia Bulletin)
  • Organisational and student characteristics, fidelity, funding models, and unit costs of recovery colleges in 28 countries: a cross-sectional survey (2023, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • Initial Training for Mental Health Peer Support Workers: Systematized Review and International Delphi Consultation (2021, JMIR Mental Health)

Mike Slade frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • BMJ Open
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • PLoS ONE

Collaborations are a feature of Mike Slade's research, with frequent co-authors including Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Fiona Ng, Yasuhiro Kotera, Graham Thornicroft, and Ashleigh Charles.

Their academic contributions also include book publications, notably with Cambridge University Press. One such work is Camberwell Assessment of Need for Adults with Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities, published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.

    Mary Leamy;Victoria Bird;Clair Le Boutillier;Julie Williams

  • Personal Recovery and Mental Illness A Guide for Mental Health Professionals

    Mike Slade

  • Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery‐oriented practices in mental health systems

    Mike Slade;Michaela Amering;Marianne Farkas;Bridget Hamilton

  • The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness.

    Michael Phelan;Mike Slade;Graham Thornicroft;Graham Dunn

  • Mental illness and well-being: the central importance of positive psychology and recovery approaches

    Mike Slade

  • A Self-report Insight Scale for Psychosis: Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity to Change

    M. Birchwood;Jo Smith;V. Drury;J. Healy

  • Social Factors and Recovery from Mental Health Difficulties: A Review of the Evidence

    Jerry Tew;Schula Ramon;Schula Ramon;Mike Slade;Victoria Bird

  • Experiences of mental illness stigma, prejudice and discrimination: a review of measures.

    Elaine Brohan;Mike Slade;Sarah Clement;Graham Thornicroft

  • What Does Recovery Mean in Practice? A Qualitative Analysis of International Recovery-Oriented Practice Guidance

    Clair Le Boutillier;Mary Leamy;Victoria J Bird;Larry Davidson

  • Systematic review of beliefs, behaviours and influencing factors associated with disclosure of a mental health problem in the workplace.

    Elaine Brohan;Claire Henderson;Kay Wheat;Estelle Malcolm

  • The importance of relationships in mental health care: a qualitative study of service users' experiences of psychiatric hospital admission in the UK.

    Helen Gilburt;Diana Rose;Mike Slade

  • Recovery: an international perspective.

    Mike Slade;Michaela Amering;Lindsay Oades

  • Mass media interventions for reducing mental health‐related stigma

    Sarah Clement;Francesca Lassman;Elizabeth Barley;Sara Evans-Lacko

  • International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review.

    M. Slade;M. Leamy;F. Bacon;M. Janosik

  • Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.

    Mike Slade

  • Hope in psychiatry: a review of the literature

    B. Schrank;G. Stanghellini;M. Slade

  • Help-seeking behaviour and adolescent self-harm: A systematic review

    Sarah L. Rowe;Rebecca S. French;Claire Henderson;Dennis Ougrin

  • The Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN): comparison of assessments by staff and patients of the needs of the severely mentally ill.

    M. Slade;M. Phelan;G. Thornicroft;S. Parkman

  • Measures of personal recovery: a systematic review

    Vicki Shanks;Julie Williams;Mary Leamy;Victoria J. Bird

  • Fit for purpose? Validation of a conceptual framework for personal recovery with current mental health consumers

    Victoria Bird;Mary Leamy;Jerry Tew;Clair Le Boutillier

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Morven Leese
Morven Leese King's College London
Julie Williams
Julie Williams Cardiff University
Sonia Johnson
Sonia Johnson University College London
Stefan Priebe
Stefan Priebe Queen Mary University of London
Lindsay G. Oades
Lindsay G. Oades University of Melbourne
Wulf Rössler
Wulf Rössler University of Zurich
Sarah Clement
Sarah Clement King's College London
Paul McCrone
Paul McCrone King's College London
Elizabeth Kuipers
Elizabeth Kuipers King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a medical career in the USA is evolving, with more students now exploring online degrees as flexible alternatives. Beyond traditional medicine programs, a variety of healthcare roles can be accessed through accredited online study, opening new pathways to rewarding careers.

Entry-level positions such as medical coder or billing specialist can be pursued by enrolling in a medical billing and coding certification online. This option is ideal for those seeking a quick, cost-effective route into healthcare administration.

For those striving to become advanced practice nurses, exploring the cheapest online fnp programs can lead to a career as a Family Nurse Practitioner. Interested in nursing more broadly? You may wonder how much is online nursing school—many accredited options balance affordability with flexibility for working students.

Further specialization and research roles are available for those considering an online phd programs nursing. This path equips graduates to become leaders in education, research, or advanced clinical practice. These varied options make healthcare careers more accessible, regardless of your current life stage or location.

Best Scientists Citing Mike Slade

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles