World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sarah Clement

Sarah Clement

Last Updated:

D-Index & Metrics

?
Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4895 4535 826 766 89 12735

Sarah Clement publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sarah Clement between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sarah Clement published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2013. 21 of the 132 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2013. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
1986 2025

132 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sarah Clement: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 4
1997 1
1998 5
1999 4
2000 4
2001 1
2002 3
2003 2
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 5
2010 5
2011 7
2012 7
2013 11
2014 5
2015 9
2016 6
2017 3
2018 2
2019 2
2020 1
2021 0
2022 4
2023 11
2024 10
2025 11
Total 132
Download as CSV

Sarah Clement publications per year - data summary

  • Sarah Clement, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from King's College London, has 132 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2013, 2023 and 2025, with 11 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1986, 1993, 1994, 1997 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 9 of the 40 years in the span carry no publications at all (1988, 1989, 1990, 1991 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.3 per year counting only the 31 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 36 publications, 27% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 21 publications (1.5 per year); 2000-2013: 47 publications (3.4 per year); 2014-2025: 64 publications (5.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Sarah Clement publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Clement sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 89 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 89
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Sarah Clement publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Sarah Clement, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from King's College London, records 89 publications - the 8th percentile of the discipline.
  • 8% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Sarah Clement, and about 92% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Sarah Clement ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Sarah Clement D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Clement sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Sarah Clement D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Sarah Clement, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from King's College London, records 41 D-Index - the 38th percentile of the discipline.
  • 38% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Sarah Clement, and about 62% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Sarah Clement ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Sarah Clement is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in environmental science, with a focus on global and planetary change, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, sociology and political science, atmospheric science, and ecology. Their research covers several main topics including urban green space and health, land use and ecosystem services, sustainability and climate change governance, disaster management and resilience, place attachment and urban studies, economic and environmental valuation, and climate change and health impacts.

Recent publications by Sarah Clement include:

  • How resilience is framed matters for governance of coastal social-ecological systems, 2023, Environmental Policy and Governance
  • Knowledge governance for the Anthropocene: Pluralism, populism, and decision-making, 2022, Global Policy

Earlier relevant publications related to nature-based solutions and sustainability include:

  • An agenda for research and action toward diverse and just futures for life on Earth, 2020, Conservation Biology
  • Novel Solutions or Rebranded Approaches: Evaluating the Use of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) in Europe, 2020, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
  • Diagnosing delivery capabilities on a large international nature-based solutions project, 2021, npj Urban Sustainability

Sarah Clement has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including İan Mell, Katie V. Spellman, Christopher D. Arp, Allen C. Bondurant, and Fearghus O'Sullivan.

Their publications are often found in journals such as Conservation Biology, SSRN Electronic Journal, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, npj Urban Sustainability, and Environmental Policy and Governance.

Sarah Clement's work is situated at the intersection of environmental science and political sociology, addressing challenges in sustainability governance, ecosystem services, and health impacts related to urban and environmental change. Their research spans empirical and theoretical approaches to resilience, governance, and knowledge management in the Anthropocene era.

Best Publications

  • What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

    Sarah Clement;Oliver Schauman;Tanya Graham;F Maggioni

  • Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination

    Graham Thornicroft;Nisha Mehta;Sarah Clement;Sara Evans-Lacko

  • Mental health-related stigma in health care and mental health-care settings

    Claire Henderson;Jo Noblett;Hannah Parke;Sarah Clement

  • Experiences of mental illness stigma, prejudice and discrimination: a review of measures.

    Elaine Brohan;Mike Slade;Sarah Clement;Graham Thornicroft

  • Systematic review of beliefs, behaviours and influencing factors associated with disclosure of a mental health problem in the workplace.

    Elaine Brohan;Claire Henderson;Kay Wheat;Estelle Malcolm

  • Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental health-related stigma and discrimination in the medium and long term: systematic review

    N Mehta;Sarah Clement;Elena Marcus;A-C Stona

  • Mass media interventions for reducing mental health‐related stigma

    Sarah Clement;Francesca Lassman;Elizabeth Barley;Sara Evans-Lacko

  • Development and psychometric properties the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation scale (BACE) related to people with mental ill health.

    Sarah Clement;Elaine Brohan;Debra Jeffery;Claire Henderson

  • Trauma-informed mental healthcare in the UK: what is it and how can we further its development?

    Angela Sweeney;Sarah Clement;Beth Filson;Angela Kennedy

  • The economic impact of mental health stigma and discrimination: a systematic review.

    Jessica Sharac;Paul Mccrone;Sarah Clement;Graham Thornicroft

  • Filmed v. live social contact interventions to reduce stigma: randomised controlled trial

    Sarah Clement;Adrienne van Nieuwenhuizen;Aliya Kassam;Clare Flach

  • Development and psychometric evaluation of the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC).

    Elaine Brohan;Sarah Clement;Diana Rose;Norman Sartorius

  • Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes (MICA) Scale—Psychometric properties of a version for healthcare students and professionals

    Jheanell Gabbidon;Sarah Clement;Adrienne van Nieuwenhuizen;Aliya Kassam

  • The AAPPQ Revisited: the measurement of general practitioners' attitudes to alcohol problems

    Peter Anderson;Sue Clement

  • Complex interventions to improve the health of people with limited literacy: A systematic review

    Sarah Clement;Saima Ibrahim;Nicola Crichton;Michael Wolf

  • The simulation of hallucinations to reduce the stigma of schizophrenia: a systematic review.

    Shuntaro Ando;Sarah Clement;Elizabeth Alexandra Barley;Graham Thornicroft

  • Anticipated and experienced discrimination amongst people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a cross sectional study

    Simone Farrelly;Sarah Clement;Jheanell Gabbidon;Debra Jeffery

  • Messages to use in population-level campaigns to reduce mental health-related stigma: consensus development study.

    Sarah Clement;Manuela Jarrett;Claire Henderson;Graham Thornicroft

  • Psychological aspects of caesarean section.

    Sarah Clement

  • Continuity of care in mental health: understanding and measuring a complex phenomenon

    T Burns;J Catty;Suzanne White;Sarah Clement

  • Newspaper reporting on schizophrenia: a content analysis of five national newspapers at two time points.

    Sarah Clement;Nena Foster

  • Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma (Protocol)

    Clement S;Lassman F;Barley E;Evans-Lacko S

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Mike Slade
Mike Slade University of Nottingham
Sara Evans-Lacko
Sara Evans-Lacko London School of Economics and Political Science
Diana Rose
Diana Rose King's College London
Stephani L. Hatch
Stephani L. Hatch King's College London
Tom Burns
Tom Burns University of Oxford
Joanna Murray
Joanna Murray King's College London
Til Wykes
Til Wykes King's College London
Mark Ashworth
Mark Ashworth King's College London
Paul McCrone
Paul McCrone King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse and rewarding career opportunities. Online degrees make it easier to gain specialized knowledge while maintaining flexibility. For example, those intrigued by counseling can consider cacrep accredited online counseling programs, which are recognized for setting high educational standards in the counseling profession.

If you’re interested in supporting families and relationships, pursuing a masters in marriage and family therapy online can be a direct path to a deeply impactful role. Those seeking more general training in human behavior may consider crime, business, or healthcare by enrolling with one of the most affordable online schools for psychology.

For a broader social impact, careers in social work are accessible through msw programs with high acceptance rate. These programs provide advanced knowledge for those passionate about tackling social challenges and supporting communities in need.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah Clement

Trending Scientists