World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
52
Citations
10872
World Ranking
2442
National Ranking
424

Mark Ashworth publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Ashworth sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 313 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mark Ashworth D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Ashworth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Ashworth is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has focused their research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses several key subfields including Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Economics and Econometrics, and Oncology.

Their research addresses various significant topics such as:

  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Mark Ashworth has contributed to a number of recent publications, including:

  • "Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study" (2021) published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • "Impact of multimorbidity on healthcare costs and utilisation: a systematic review of the UK literature" (2020) published in British Journal of General Practice
  • "Association between antibiotics and gut microbiome dysbiosis in children: systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021) published in Gut Microbes
  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular disease prevention and management" (2023) published in Nature Medicine
  • "Is health research undertaken where the burden of disease is greatest? Observational study of geographical inequalities in recruitment to research in England 2013-2018" (2020) published in BMC Medicine

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Stevo Durbaba
  • Matthew Hotopf
  • Hiten Dodhia
  • Martin Gulliford
  • Robert Stewart

Mark Ashworth commonly publishes in the following venues:

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMJ Open
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • BJGP Open

Best Publications

  • Associations between multimorbidity, healthcare utilisation and health status: evidence from 16 European countries

    Raffaele Palladino;John Tayu Lee;Mark Ashworth;Maria Triassi

  • Impact of multimorbidity on healthcare costs and utilisation: a systematic review of the UK literature

    Marina Soley-Bori;Mark Ashworth;Alessandra Bisquera;Hiten Dodhia

  • Continued high rates of antibiotic prescribing to adults with respiratory tract infection: survey of 568 UK general practices.

    Martin C Gulliford;Alex Dregan;Michael V Moore;Mark Ashworth

  • Variations in antibiotic prescribing and consultation rates for acute respiratory infection in UK general practices 1995–2000

    Mark Ashworth;Judith Charlton;Karen Ballard;Radoslav Latinovic

  • A client-generated psychometric instrument: The development of ‘PSYCHLOPS’

    Mark Ashworth;Melanie Shepherd;Jeremy Christey;Veronica Matthews

  • Why has antibiotic prescribing for respiratory illness declined in primary care? A longitudinal study using the General Practice Research Database

    Mark Ashworth;Radoslav Latinovic;Judith Charlton;Kate Cox

  • Association between antibiotics and gut microbiome dysbiosis in children: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Lucy McDonnell;Alexander Gilkes;Mark Ashworth;Victoria Rowland

  • Parental help-seeking in primary care for child and adolescent mental health concerns: qualitative study

    Kapil Sayal;Victoria Tischler;Caroline Coope;Sarah Robotham

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular disease prevention and management

    Unknown

  • Safety of reduced antibiotic prescribing for self limiting respiratory tract infections in primary care: cohort study using electronic health records.

    Martin C Gulliford;Michael V Moore;Paul Little;Alastair D Hay

  • The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004–5

    Mark Ashworth;David Armstrong

  • Effect of social deprivation on blood pressure monitoring and control in England: a survey of data from the quality and outcomes framework

    Mark Ashworth;Jibby Medina;Myfanwy Morgan

  • The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.

    Mark Ashworth;Paul Seed;David Armstrong;Stevo Durbaba

  • Impact of pay for performance on inequalities in health care: systematic review:

    Riyadh Alshamsan;Azeem Majeed;Mark Ashworth;Josip Car

  • Antibiotic prescribing and patient satisfaction in primary care in England: cross-sectional analysis of national patient survey data and prescribing data.

    Mark Ashworth;Patrick White;Hannah Jongsma;Peter Schofield

  • 'Time and space': carers' views about respite care.

    Mark Ashworth;Anna H. Baker

  • Effectiveness and safety of electronically delivered prescribing feedback and decision support on antibiotic use for respiratory illness in primary care: REDUCE cluster randomised trial.

    Martin C Gulliford;A Toby Prevost;A Toby Prevost;Judith Charlton;Dorota Juszczyk

  • Epilepsy mortality and risk factors for death in epilepsy: a population-based study

    Leone Ridsdale;Judith L. Charlton;Mark Ashworth;Mark P. Richardson

  • Selective decrease in consultations and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in UK primary care up to 2006.

    Martin Gulliford;Radoslav Latinovic;Judith Charlton;Paul Little

  • Investigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population study

    Evangelos Kontopantelis;David A Springate;Mark Ashworth;Roger T Webb

  • Quality and Outcomes Framework: time to take stock.

    Mark Ashworth;Maria Kordowicz

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Gulliford
Martin Gulliford King's College London
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Matthew Hotopf
Matthew Hotopf King's College London
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Robert Stewart
Robert Stewart King's College London
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Paul McCrone
Paul McCrone King's College London
Paul T. Seed
Paul T. Seed King's College London
Simon Parsons
Simon Parsons University of Lincoln
Sanjay Modgil
Sanjay Modgil King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the rise of flexible online education, students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities now have more affordable and accelerated study options. Choosing the right degree can directly influence your career path and potential for advancement.

Prospective social workers should explore the cheapest online msw programs to make graduate education accessible. For those wanting to help individuals with behavioral challenges, online bcba programs are a cost-effective route to certification as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

If you’re seeking to fast-track your social work career, a masters in social work online offers a flexible way to quickly gain professional credentials. Similarly, students looking for a foundational degree in human behavior can consider a fast track bachelor degree in psychology for quicker entry into related fields.

These online pathways allow you to balance work, life, and study—ensuring your education propels you toward your career goals in the social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Ashworth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles