World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 52 2442 2225 424 383 313 10872

Mark Ashworth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Ashworth between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Ashworth published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2021. 32 of the 399 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2021. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 9 publications
1983 2025

399 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Ashworth: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 2
2000 4
2001 2
2002 8
2003 3
2004 6
2005 10
2006 4
2007 8
2008 8
2009 8
2010 16
2011 11
2012 9
2013 10
2014 20
2015 20
2016 29
2017 22
2018 20
2019 23
2020 27
2021 35
2022 30
2023 25
2024 23
2025 9
Total 399
Download as CSV

Mark Ashworth publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Ashworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 304–313 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 313 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95 313
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Ashworth D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Ashworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138 52
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Ashworth is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has focused their research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses several key subfields including Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Economics and Econometrics, and Oncology.

Their research addresses various significant topics such as:

  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Mark Ashworth has contributed to a number of recent publications, including:

  • "Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study" (2021) published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • "Impact of multimorbidity on healthcare costs and utilisation: a systematic review of the UK literature" (2020) published in British Journal of General Practice
  • "Association between antibiotics and gut microbiome dysbiosis in children: systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021) published in Gut Microbes
  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular disease prevention and management" (2023) published in Nature Medicine
  • "Is health research undertaken where the burden of disease is greatest? Observational study of geographical inequalities in recruitment to research in England 2013-2018" (2020) published in BMC Medicine

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Stevo Durbaba
  • Matthew Hotopf
  • Hiten Dodhia
  • Martin Gulliford
  • Robert Stewart

Mark Ashworth commonly publishes in the following venues:

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMJ Open
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • BJGP Open

Best Publications

  • Associations between multimorbidity, healthcare utilisation and health status: evidence from 16 European countries

    Raffaele Palladino;John Tayu Lee;Mark Ashworth;Maria Triassi

  • Impact of multimorbidity on healthcare costs and utilisation: a systematic review of the UK literature

    Marina Soley-Bori;Mark Ashworth;Alessandra Bisquera;Hiten Dodhia

  • Continued high rates of antibiotic prescribing to adults with respiratory tract infection: survey of 568 UK general practices.

    Martin C Gulliford;Alex Dregan;Michael V Moore;Mark Ashworth

  • Variations in antibiotic prescribing and consultation rates for acute respiratory infection in UK general practices 1995–2000

    Mark Ashworth;Judith Charlton;Karen Ballard;Radoslav Latinovic

  • A client-generated psychometric instrument: The development of ‘PSYCHLOPS’

    Mark Ashworth;Melanie Shepherd;Jeremy Christey;Veronica Matthews

  • Why has antibiotic prescribing for respiratory illness declined in primary care? A longitudinal study using the General Practice Research Database

    Mark Ashworth;Radoslav Latinovic;Judith Charlton;Kate Cox

  • Association between antibiotics and gut microbiome dysbiosis in children: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Lucy McDonnell;Alexander Gilkes;Mark Ashworth;Victoria Rowland

  • Parental help-seeking in primary care for child and adolescent mental health concerns: qualitative study

    Kapil Sayal;Victoria Tischler;Caroline Coope;Sarah Robotham

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular disease prevention and management

    Unknown

  • Safety of reduced antibiotic prescribing for self limiting respiratory tract infections in primary care: cohort study using electronic health records.

    Martin C Gulliford;Michael V Moore;Paul Little;Alastair D Hay

  • The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004–5

    Mark Ashworth;David Armstrong

  • Effect of social deprivation on blood pressure monitoring and control in England: a survey of data from the quality and outcomes framework

    Mark Ashworth;Jibby Medina;Myfanwy Morgan

  • The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.

    Mark Ashworth;Paul Seed;David Armstrong;Stevo Durbaba

  • Impact of pay for performance on inequalities in health care: systematic review:

    Riyadh Alshamsan;Azeem Majeed;Mark Ashworth;Josip Car

  • Antibiotic prescribing and patient satisfaction in primary care in England: cross-sectional analysis of national patient survey data and prescribing data.

    Mark Ashworth;Patrick White;Hannah Jongsma;Peter Schofield

  • 'Time and space': carers' views about respite care.

    Mark Ashworth;Anna H. Baker

  • Effectiveness and safety of electronically delivered prescribing feedback and decision support on antibiotic use for respiratory illness in primary care: REDUCE cluster randomised trial.

    Martin C Gulliford;A Toby Prevost;A Toby Prevost;Judith Charlton;Dorota Juszczyk

  • Epilepsy mortality and risk factors for death in epilepsy: a population-based study

    Leone Ridsdale;Judith L. Charlton;Mark Ashworth;Mark P. Richardson

  • Selective decrease in consultations and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in UK primary care up to 2006.

    Martin Gulliford;Radoslav Latinovic;Judith Charlton;Paul Little

  • Investigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population study

    Evangelos Kontopantelis;David A Springate;Mark Ashworth;Roger T Webb

  • Quality and Outcomes Framework: time to take stock.

    Mark Ashworth;Maria Kordowicz

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Gulliford
Martin Gulliford King's College London
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Matthew Hotopf
Matthew Hotopf King's College London
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Robert Stewart
Robert Stewart King's College London
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Paul McCrone
Paul McCrone King's College London
Paul T. Seed
Paul T. Seed King's College London
Simon Parsons
Simon Parsons University of Lincoln
Sanjay Modgil
Sanjay Modgil King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the rise of flexible online education, students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities now have more affordable and accelerated study options. Choosing the right degree can directly influence your career path and potential for advancement.

Prospective social workers should explore the cheapest online msw programs to make graduate education accessible. For those wanting to help individuals with behavioral challenges, online bcba programs are a cost-effective route to certification as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

If you’re seeking to fast-track your social work career, a masters in social work online offers a flexible way to quickly gain professional credentials. Similarly, students looking for a foundational degree in human behavior can consider a fast track bachelor degree in psychology for quicker entry into related fields.

These online pathways allow you to balance work, life, and study—ensuring your education propels you toward your career goals in the social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Ashworth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles