World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
23002
World Ranking
17129
National Ranking
1552

Kerenza Hood publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kerenza Hood sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 450 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kerenza Hood D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kerenza Hood sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kerenza Hood is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom and specializes primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their research covers a range of main topics such as:

  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Kerenza Hood has contributed to numerous publications and frequently publishes in venues including:

  • Trials
  • BMJ Open
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Health Technology Assessment
  • British Journal of General Practice

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • David Gillespie
  • Victoria Shepherd
  • Emma Thomas-Jones
  • Fiona Wood
  • Nick Francis

Among recent papers associated with Kerenza Hood are:

  • Characterization of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause neonatal sepsis in seven low- and middle-income countries, 2021, Nature Microbiology
  • Molnupiravir plus usual care versus usual care alone as early treatment for adults with COVID-19 at increased risk of adverse outcomes (PANORAMIC): an open-label, platform-adaptive randomised controlled trial, 2022, The Lancet
  • Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Neonatal sepsis and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries from a facility-based birth cohort: an international multisite prospective observational study, 2022, The Lancet Global Health
  • Barriers and facilitators to primary health care for people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: an integrative review, 2020, BJGP Open

Best Publications

  • Is there evidence that palliative care teams alter end-of-life experiences of patients and their caregivers?

    Irene J. Higginson;Ilora Gillian Finlay;Danielle M. Goodwin;Kerenza Hood

  • Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.

    Glyn Elwyn;Adrian G. Edwards;M. Wensing;Kerenza Hood

  • Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial

    Jochen W. L. Cals;Christopher Collett Butler;Rogier M. Hopstaken;Kerenza Hood

  • A multicenter randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing in teenagers with diabetes

    Susan Jane Channon;Michelle Victoria Huws-Thomas;Stephen Rollnick;Kerenza Hood

  • Effects of internet-based training on antibiotic prescribing rates for acute respiratory-tract infections: a multinational, cluster, randomised, factorial, controlled trial

    Paul Little;Beth Stuart;Nicholas Andrew Francis;Elaine Douglas

  • Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests

    Adrian G. Edwards;Gurudutt Naik;Haroon Ahmed;Glyn Elwyn

  • Variation in antibiotic prescribing and its impact on recovery in patients with acute cough in primary care: prospective study in 13 countries

    Christopher Collett Butler;Kerenza Hood;T. Verheij;P. Little

  • Oral vitamin B12 versus intramuscular vitamin B12 for vitamin B12 deficiency

    Josep Vidal-Alaball;Christopher Collett Butler;Rebecca Louise Cannings-John;Andrew Goringe

  • Effectiveness of multifaceted educational programme to reduce antibiotic dispensing in primary care: practice based randomised controlled trial

    Christopher Collett Butler;Sharon Anne Simpson;Frank David John Dunstan;Stephen Rollnick

  • Effect of using an interactive booklet about childhood respiratory tract infections in primary care consultations on reconsulting and antibiotic prescribing: a cluster randomised controlled trial

    Nicholas Andrew Francis;Christopher Collett Butler;Kerenza Hood;Sharon Anne Simpson

  • Establishing the international prevalence of self-reported child maltreatment: a systematic review by maltreatment type and gender

    Gwenllian Moody;Rebecca Cannings-John;Kerenza Hood;Alison Kemp

  • Measuring adaptations of motivational interviewing: the development and validation of the behavior change counseling index (BECCI)

    Claire Lane;Michelle Huws-Thomas;Kerenza Hood;Stephen Rollnick

  • Amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care when pneumonia is not suspected: a 12-country, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    Paul Little;Beth Stuart;Michael Moore;Samuel Coenen

  • Oral vitamin B12 versus intramuscular vitamin B12 for vitamin B12 deficiency: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    Christopher Collett Butler;Josep Vidal-Alaball;Rebecca Louise Cannings-John;Andrew McCaddon

  • Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice

    Glyn Elwyn;Adrian G. Edwards;Kerenza Hood;Michael Richard Robling

  • Levels of mental health problems among UK emergency ambulance workers

    P Bennett;Y Williams;N Page;K Hood

  • Interventions before consultations for helping patients address their information needs.

    Paul Richard Kinnersley;Adrian G. Edwards;Kerenza Hood;Naomi Louise Cadbury

  • Using dietetic assistants to improve the outcome of hip fracture: a randomised controlled trial of nutritional support in an acute trauma ward

    Donna Georgina Duncan;Susan Janet Beck;Kerenza Hood;Antony Johansen

  • Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.

    Adrian G. Edwards;Glyn Elwyn;Kerenza Hood;Christine Leander Angela Atwell

  • Characterization of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause neonatal sepsis in seven low- and middle-income countries

    Kirsty Sands;Kirsty Sands;Maria J Carvalho;Maria J Carvalho;Edward Portal;Kathryn Thomson

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Collett Butler
Christopher Collett Butler University of Oxford
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Fiona Wood
Fiona Wood Cardiff University
Herman Goossens
Herman Goossens University of Antwerp
Adrian Edwards
Adrian Edwards Cardiff University
Simon Murphy
Simon Murphy Cardiff University
Laurence Moore
Laurence Moore University of Glasgow
Glyn Elwyn
Glyn Elwyn Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
Paul Bennett
Paul Bennett Swansea University
Sharon Anne Simpson
Sharon Anne Simpson University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens the door to many related fields that can be pursued through online study. For example, many students and professionals seek an affordable healthcare administration degree online to prepare for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health systems. This route is ideal for those interested in the organizational side of healthcare.

Graduate-level training is a key step for advancing your career. If you're considering a master's degree, there are numerous cheapest online mha programs that can help you gain the expertise needed in healthcare management at a lower cost.

For those aiming for the highest qualifications in clinical practice, you might explore the cheapest dnp online programs. These fast-track and affordable options let nursing professionals reach a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree online.

Another rewarding pathway is pharmacy. Flexible pharm d online programs are designed for those looking to earn a Doctor of Pharmacy degree while balancing work and study.

Each of these online degree options expands your expertise and career opportunities within the healthcare sector without requiring you to relocate or pause your current job.

Best Scientists Citing Kerenza Hood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles