World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
23164
World Ranking
13344
National Ranking
6787

John N. Lorenz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Lorenz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 218 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John N. Lorenz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Lorenz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John N. Lorenz is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on cardiology and molecular mechanisms underlying muscle function.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broader fields, their work concentrates on several subfields such as:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Developmental Neuroscience

The topics covered by their publications reflect this range, including:

  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Signaling Pathways in Disease

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Lorenz are:

  • Fast skeletal myosin-binding protein-C regulates fast skeletal muscle contraction, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Amino terminus of cardiac myosin binding protein-C regulates cardiac contractility, 2021, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  • Guidelines for assessing ventricular pressure-volume relationships in rodents, 2024, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • Unlocking the Role of sMyBP-C: A Key Player in Skeletal Muscle Development and Growth, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • HuR inhibition reduces post-ischemic cardiac remodeling by dampening acute inflammatory gene expression and the innate immune response, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent collaborators of John N. Lorenz include:

  • Michelle L. Nieman
  • Sakthivel Sadayappan
  • James W. McNamara
  • Taejeong Song
  • Rohit Singh

Among publication venues where Lorenz often publishes are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Circulation Research
  • American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • Physiology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Best Publications

  • Transgenic Gαq overexpression induces cardiac contractile failure in mice

    Drew D. D’Angelo;Yoshihito Sakata;John N. Lorenz;Gregory P. Boivin

  • Renal and intestinal absorptive defects in mice lacking the NHE3 Na + /H + exchanger

    Patrick J. Schultheis;Lane L. Clarke;Pierre Meneton;Marian L. Miller

  • PKC-alpha regulates cardiac contractility and propensity toward heart failure.

    Julian C Braz;Kimberly Gregory;Anand Pathak;Wen Zhao

  • GDF15/MIC-1 Functions As a Protective and Antihypertrophic Factor Released From the Myocardium in Association With SMAD Protein Activation

    Jian Xu;Thomas R. Kimball;John N. Lorenz;David A. Brown

  • A role for Smad6 in development and homeostasis of the cardiovascular system

    Katherine M. Galvin;Michael J. Donovan;Catherine A. Lynch;Ronald I. Meyer

  • Early and Delayed Consequences of β2-Adrenergic Receptor Overexpression in Mouse Hearts Critical Role for Expression Level

    Stephen B. Liggett;Nicole M. Tepe;John N. Lorenz;Amy M. Canning

  • Fibroblast growth factor 2 control of vascular tone.

    Ming Zhou;Roy L. Sutliff;Richard J. Paul;John N. Lorenz

  • Cerebral ischemia-hypoxia induces intravascular coagulation and autophagy.

    Faisal Adhami;Faisal Adhami;Guanghong Liao;Yury M. Morozov;Aryn Schloemer

  • Mice Lacking the Basolateral Na-K-2Cl Cotransporter Have Impaired Epithelial Chloride Secretion and Are Profoundly Deaf

    Michael Flagella;Lane L. Clarke;Marian L. Miller;Lawrence C. Erway

  • Sustained in vivo cardiac protection by a rationally designed peptide that causes ɛ protein kinase C translocation

    Gerald W. Dorn;Miriam C. Souroujon;Miriam C. Souroujon;Tamar Liron;Che Hong Chen

  • Evolution of the mdx mouse cardiomyopathy: physiological and morphological findings.

    John G. Quinlan;Harvey S. Hahn;Brenda L. Wong;John N. Lorenz

  • Impaired Cardiac Performance in Heterozygous Mice with a Null Mutation in the Sarco(endo)plasmic Reticulum Ca2+-ATPase Isoform 2 (SERCA2) Gene

    Muthu Periasamy;Thomas D. Reed;Lynne H. Liu;Yong Ji

  • Mitochondrial death protein Nix is induced in cardiac hypertrophy and triggers apoptotic cardiomyopathy.

    Martin G. Yussman;Tsuyoshi Toyokawa;Amy Odley;Roy A. Lynch

  • Impaired cardiac hypertrophic response in Calcineurin Aβ-deficient mice

    Orlando F. Bueno;Benjamin J. Wilkins;Kevin M. Tymitz;Betty J. Glascock

  • Low- and high-level transgenic expression of β2-adrenergic receptors differentially affect cardiac hypertrophy and function in Gαq-overexpressing mice

    Gerald W. Dorn;Nicole M. Tepe;John N. Lorenz;Walter J. Koch

  • Expression of R120G–αB-Crystallin Causes Aberrant Desmin and αB-Crystallin Aggregation and Cardiomyopathy in Mice

    Xuejun Wang;Hanna Osinska;Raisa Klevitsky;A. Martin Gerdes

  • Mice without myoglobin

    Daniel J. Garry;George A. Ordway;John N. Lorenz;Nina B. Radford

  • Phenotype Resembling Gitelman's Syndrome in Mice Lacking the Apical Na+-Cl− Cotransporter of the Distal Convoluted Tubule *

    Patrick J. Schultheis;John N. Lorenz;Pierre Meneton;Michelle L. Nieman

  • Heart block, ventricular tachycardia, and sudden death in ACE2 transgenic mice with downregulated connexins

    Mary Donoghue;Hiroko Wakimoto;Colin T Maguire;Susan Acton

  • MEK1-ERK2 Signaling Pathway Protects Myocardium From Ischemic Injury In Vivo

    Daniel J. Lips;Orlando F. Bueno;Benjamin J. Wilkins;Nicole H. Purcell

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary E. Shull
Gary E. Shull University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Jeffrey Robbins
Jeffrey Robbins Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Jeffery D. Molkentin
Jeffery D. Molkentin Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Jerry B. Lingrel
Jerry B. Lingrel University of Cincinnati
Evangelia G. Kranias
Evangelia G. Kranias University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Thomas Doetschman
Thomas Doetschman University of Arizona
Stephen B. Liggett
Stephen B. Liggett University of South Florida
Yigang Wang
Yigang Wang University of Cincinnati
Gregory P. Boivin
Gregory P. Boivin Wright State University
Jurgen Schnermann
Jurgen Schnermann National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Embarking on a career in medicine doesn’t always require the traditional, lengthy pathway. Many students and professionals are considering nursing and allied health programs that offer flexibility, affordability, and strategic entry points into the field.

For those in nursing with aspirations for leadership or advanced clinical roles, pursuing an online nursing doctorate is a strategic move. These programs combine rigorous research training with the convenience of online learning. Cost is an important factor, especially at the bachelor’s level: the average cost of rn to bsn programs varies widely, so comparing programs can help you maximize value and minimize debt.

Some non-nurses may explore the cheapest direct entry msn programs to fast-track qualification as a nurse and move quickly into the workforce. Others—especially those just starting out—might prioritize accessibility and look for the easiest rn program to begin their healthcare journey.

Ultimately, selecting an online degree or pathway should reflect your academic goals, budget, and desired pace for entering (or advancing within) the healthcare profession.

Best Scientists Citing John N. Lorenz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles