World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
6665
World Ranking
7605
National Ranking
4087

Peter Martin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Martin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 208 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter Martin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Martin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Martin is affiliated with Iowa State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on psychology, medicine, and social sciences. In these areas, they have contributed extensively to understanding health disparities, aging and gerontology, dementia, psychological well-being, personality traits, intergenerational family dynamics, and prenatal substance exposure effects.

The scientist's work addresses a wide range of topics, including:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Peter Martin's primary fields of study are:

  • Psychology (64 publications)
  • Medicine (60 publications)
  • Social Sciences (45 publications)

In addition, their research extends into several specialized subfields such as:

  • Health
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Their most frequent publication venues include:

  • Innovation in Aging (30 publications)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia (3 publications)
  • The International Journal of Aging and Human Development (3 publications)
  • Personality and Individual Differences (2 publications)
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (2 publications)

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter Martin are:

  • Association of Pregnancy and Insurance Status With Treatment Access for Opioid Use Disorder, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • The association of blood pressure with physical frailty and cognitive function in community-dwelling septuagenarians, octogenarians, and nonagenarians: the SONIC study, 2020, Hypertension Research
  • Personality and compliance with COVID-19 protective measures among older Americans: Moderating effects of age, gender, and race/ethnicity, 2022, Personality and Individual Differences
  • Cognition, function, and prevalent dementia in centenarians and near-centenarians: An individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of 18 studies, 2022, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Development and Validation of a Model to Predict Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, 2020, The Journal of Pediatrics

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Gina Lee
  • Leonard W. Poon
  • Bradley J. Willcox
  • Rotem Arieli
  • Joseph Kim

Best Publications

  • Defining Successful Aging: A Tangible or Elusive Concept?

    Peter Martin;Norene Kelly;Boaz Kahana;Eva Kahana

  • Perceptions of technology among older adults.

    Melinda Heinz;Peter Martin;Jennifer A Margrett;Mary Yearns

  • A Model of Loneliness in Older Adults

    Bronwyn S. Fees;Peter Martin;Leonard W. Poon

  • The Relationship between Physical Health and Psychological Well-Being among Oldest-Old Adults.

    Jinmyoung Cho;Peter Martin;Jennifer A. Margrett;Maurice MacDonald

  • Successful Aging and Subjective Well-Being Among Oldest-Old Adults

    Jinmyoung Cho;Peter Martin;Leonard W. Poon

  • The Georgia Centenarian Study

    Leonard W. Poon;Gloria M. Clayton;Peter Martin;Mary Ann Johnson

  • Happiness and congruence in older adulthood: a structural model of life satisfaction.

    A J Bishop;P Martin;L Poon

  • The impact of perceived stress, social support, and home-based physical activity on mental health among older adults.

    Kyung Hwa Kwag;Peter Martin;Daniel Russell;Warren Franke

  • Personality, Relationship Closeness, and Loneliness of Oldest Old Adults and Their Children

    M. Valora Long;Peter Martin

  • Age Differences in Stress, Social Resources, and Well-Being in Middle and Older Age

    Mike Martin;Martin Grünendahl;Peter Martin

  • Methodological Considerations in Studying Centenarians: Lessons Learned From the Georgia Centenarian Studies.

    Leonard W Poon;Michal Jazwinski;Robert C Green;John L Woodard

  • Proximal and Distal Influences on Development: The Model of Developmental Adaptation☆

    Peter Martin;Mike Martin

  • Social and Psychological Resources in the Oldest Old

    Peter Martin;Leonard W. Poon;Eunkyung Kim;Mary Ann Johnson

  • Mini-Mental State Exam status of community-dwelling cognitively intact centenarians.

    Philip A. Holtsberg;Leonard W. Poon;Carol A. Noble;Peter Martin

  • Age Changes and Differences in Personality Traits and States of the Old and Very Old

    Peter Martin;M. Valora Long;Leonard W. Poon

  • The Older They Are, the Less Successful They Become? Findings from the Georgia Centenarian Study

    Jinmyoung Cho;Peter Martin;Leonard W. Poon

  • Understanding Centenarians' Psychosocial Dynamics and Their Contributions to Health and Quality of Life

    Leonard W. Poon;Peter Martin;Alex Bishop;Jinmyoung Cho

  • Predictors of loneliness in centenarians: A parallel study

    Peter Martin;Bo Hagberg;Leonard W. Poon

  • Individual Differences in the Effects of Disease and Disability on Depressive Symptoms: The Role of Age and Subjective Health

    Yuri Jang;Leonard W. Poon;Peter Martin

  • Families and intergenerational relationships in aging societies: comparing the United States with German-speaking countries

    Vern L. Bengtson;Peter Martin

  • 'Inappropriate' attendance at an accident and emergency department by adults registered in local general practices: how is it related to their use of primary care?

    Alison Martin;Christopher Martin;Peter B Martin;Peter A B Martin

  • Life events and personality predicting loneliness among centenarians: findings from the Georgia Centenarian Study.

    Bob Hensley;Peter Martin;Jennifer A Margrett;Maurice MacDonald

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonard W. Poon
Leonard W. Poon University of Georgia
John L. Woodard
John L. Woodard Wayne State University
Adam Davey
Adam Davey University of Delaware
Ilene C. Siegler
Ilene C. Siegler Duke University
L. Stephen Miller
L. Stephen Miller University of Georgia
Daniel W. Russell
Daniel W. Russell Iowa State University
Robert C. Green
Robert C. Green Brigham and Women's Hospital
Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Alberto Noriega-Crespo
Alberto Noriega-Crespo Space Telescope Science Institute
Marla Gearing
Marla Gearing Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in counseling and psychology can open many doors for those aspiring to start a career in this rewarding field. Today, several universities across the U.S. offer accelerated and flexible programs tailored for busy students or working professionals.

States like Ohio offer Ohio accelerated counseling master degrees online, allowing students to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner. For those seeking national options, the fastest online counseling master's degree programs ranking in America provides a detailed comparison of top programs, helping you find the right fit.

The demand for counselors remains strong in states like New York, where the fastest online counseling programs in New York offer specialized curricula and flexible scheduling. Within Ohio specifically, you can review the fastest online counseling degrees in Ohio for region-tailored opportunities.

Whether you are interested in clinical counseling, school psychology, or community mental health, choosing an accredited online program is a smart step towards a fulfilling career helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles