World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Panteleimon Giannakopoulos

Panteleimon Giannakopoulos

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 18178 17078 282 270 346 18541

Panteleimon Giannakopoulos publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Panteleimon Giannakopoulos between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Panteleimon Giannakopoulos published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 10.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2012. 7 of the 373 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2012. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 7 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

373 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Panteleimon Giannakopoulos: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 7
1995 6
1996 5
1997 7
1998 7
1999 6
2000 8
2001 9
2002 8
2003 13
2004 13
2005 8
2006 16
2007 14
2008 20
2009 21
2010 17
2011 20
2012 25
2013 21
2014 9
2015 16
2016 22
2017 14
2018 6
2019 8
2020 9
2021 5
2022 8
2023 7
2024 9
2025 6
2026 1
Total 373
Download as CSV

Panteleimon Giannakopoulos publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Panteleimon Giannakopoulos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 346 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 346
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Panteleimon Giannakopoulos D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Panteleimon Giannakopoulos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Panteleimon Giannakopoulos is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland and has an extensive publication record primarily in the fields of Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Their research focuses on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Physiology.

The scientist's work spans multiple key topics, including Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending, Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments, Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and Schizophrenia Research and Treatment.

Among recent notable papers are:

  • Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: the role of biomarkers including advanced EEG signal analysis. Report from the IFCN-sponsored panel of experts (2020), Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Early-Phase18F-Florbetapir and18F-Flutemetamol Images as Proxies of Brain Metabolism in a Memory Clinic Setting (2022), Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • PET amyloid in normal aging: direct comparison of visual and automatic processing methods (2020), Scientific Reports
  • Less agreeable, better preserved? A PET amyloid and MRI study in a community-based cohort (2020), Neurobiology of Aging
  • Microbleeds and Medial Temporal Atrophy Determine Cognitive Trajectories in Normal Aging: A Longitudinal PET-MRI Study (2020), Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

The scientist frequently publishes in diverse venues. The main publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Neurobiology of Aging

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research, with frequent coauthors such as:

  • François R. Herrmann
  • Cristelle Rodriguez
  • Sven Haller
  • Marie-Louise Montandon
  • Valentina Garibotto

Best Publications

  • Tangle and neuron numbers, but not amyloid load, predict cognitive status in Alzheimer's disease.

    Panteleimon Giannakopoulos;François Herrmann;T. Bussiere;T. Bussiere;Constantin Bouras;Constantin Bouras

  • Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on biomarkers

    Giovanni B Frisoni;Marina Boccardi;Frederik Barkhof;Kaj Blennow;Kaj Blennow

  • Evidence-Based Guidelines for Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Summary of WHO Recommendations

    Tarun Dua;Corrado Barbui;Nicolas Clark;Alexandra Fleischmann

  • Regional Distribution of Neurofibrillary Tangles and Senile Plaques in the Cerebral Cortex of Elderly Patients: A Quantitative Evaluation of a One-Year Autopsy Population from a Geriatric Hospital

    Constantin Bouras;Patrick R. Hof;Pantèleimon Giannakopoulos;Jean-Pierre Michel

  • Distinction between Perceptual and Attentional Processing in Working Memory Tasks: A Study of Phase-locked and Induced Oscillatory Brain Dynamics

    Marie-Pierre Deiber;Pascal Missonnier;Olivier Bertrand;Gabriel Gold

  • Lewy body densities in the entorhinal and anterior cingulate cortex predict cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease

    Eniko Veronika Kovari;Gabriel Gold;François Herrmann;Alessandra Canuto

  • Sensitivity and specificity of newly proposed clinical criteria for possible vascular dementia

    G. Gold;P. Giannakopoulos;C. Montes-Paixao;F. R. Herrman

  • Anterior cingulate cortex pathology in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

    Constantin Bouras;Enikö Kövari;Patrick R. Hof;Beat M. Riederer

  • Clinicopathological validation study of four sets of clinical criteria for vascular dementia.

    Gabriel Gold;Constantin Bouras;Alessandra Canuto;Maria Fernanda Bergallo

  • Cognitive Consequences of Thalamic, Basal Ganglia, and Deep White Matter Lacunes in Brain Aging and Dementia

    Gabriel Gold;Eniko Veronika Kovari;François Herrmann;Alessandra Canuto

  • Cortical Microinfarcts and Demyelination Significantly Affect Cognition in Brain Aging

    Eniko Veronika Kovari;Gabriel Gold;François Herrmann;Alessandra Canuto

  • Progressive degeneration of nonphosphorylated neurofilament protein-enriched pyramidal neurons predicts cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease: stereologic analysis of prefrontal cortex area 9.

    Thierry Bussière;Panteleimon Giannakopoulos;Panteleimon Giannakopoulos;Constantin Bouras;Constantin Bouras;Daniel P. Perl

  • Pain in severe dementia: self-assessment or observational scales?

    Sophie Pautex;Agnès Michon;Monia Guedira;Héloise Emond

  • Body mass index in midlife and dementia: Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of 589,649 men and women followed in longitudinal studies.

    Emiliano Albanese;Lenore J. Launer;Matthias Egger;Martin J. Prince

  • Frontal theta event-related synchronization: comparison of directed attention and working memory load effects

    P. Missonnier;M.-P. Deiber;G. Gold;P. Millet

  • Cerebral cortex pathology in aging and Alzheimer's disease: a quantitative survey of large hospital-based geriatric and psychiatric cohorts.

    Panteleimon Giannakopoulos;Patrick R Hof;Jean-Pierre Michel;José Guimon

  • Identification of Alzheimer and vascular lesion thresholds for mixed dementia

    Gabriel Gold;Panteleimon Giannakopoulos;François Herrmann;Constantin Bouras

  • Working memory load–related electroencephalographic parameters can differentiate progressive from stable mild cognitive impairment

    Pascal Missonnier;M. P. Deiber;M. P. Deiber;Gabriel Gold;François Herrmann

  • Clinicometabolic dissociation of cognitive functions and social behavior in frontal lobe lesions

    M. Sarazin;B. Pillon;P. Giannakopoulos;G. Rancurel

  • Clinical validity of Braak neuropathological staging in the oldest-old.

    G. Gold;C. Bouras;E. Kövari;A. Canuto

Frequent Co-Authors

Constantin Bouras
Constantin Bouras University of Geneva
François Herrmann
François Herrmann University of Geneva
Patrick R. Hof
Patrick R. Hof Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Sven Haller
Sven Haller Uppsala University
Valentina Garibotto
Valentina Garibotto University of Geneva
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Dimitri Van De Ville
Dimitri Van De Ville École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Marie-Pierre Deiber
Marie-Pierre Deiber University of Geneva
John H. Morrison
John H. Morrison University of California, Davis
Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis
Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the US doesn’t always mean attending traditional, on-campus programs. There are several affordable online degree options that can help you build a future in healthcare. For instance, health informatics is a fast-growing field that blends healthcare with data management and technology. Professionals in this area play a crucial role in streamlining patient care and ensuring data security.

Another popular and accessible option is medical billing and coding. If you’re curious about cost, learn more about how much is medical billing and coding school. These programs typically take less time than a traditional degree and can unlock remote work opportunities.

For those seeking clinical roles, there are affordable options for aspiring nurse practitioners and registered nurses. You can compare the cheapest fnp programs online, as well as browse the cheapest online nursing program to get started on a nursing career. Online healthcare degrees offer flexibility, making them a practical choice for many students.

Best Scientists Citing Panteleimon Giannakopoulos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles