World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marie-Pierre Deiber

Marie-Pierre Deiber

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
11481
World Ranking
8429
National Ranking
194

Marie-Pierre Deiber publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie-Pierre Deiber sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marie-Pierre Deiber D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie-Pierre Deiber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marie-Pierre Deiber is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland and specializes in Neuroscience and Medicine. Their research extensively covers Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work primarily focuses on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Mental Health Research Topics, Personality Disorders and Psychopathology, and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment.

Frequent publication venues for Marie-Pierre Deiber include:

  • Brain Topography
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Biological Psychology
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Psychiatry Research

The following recent papers highlight the scope of their research publications:

  • Electroencephalographic Microstates as Novel Functional Biomarkers for Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, 2021, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Dysfunctional temporal stages of eye-gaze perception in adults with ADHD: A high-density EEG study, 2022, Biological Psychology
  • Electrophysiological correlates of improved executive function following EEG neurofeedback in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 2021, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Associations of executive and functional outcomes with full-score intellectual quotient among ADHD adults, 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • Resting-State EEG Microstates and Power Spectrum in Borderline Personality Disorder: A High-Density EEG Study, 2023, Brain Topography

Marie-Pierre Deiber collaborates frequently with other researchers including:

  • Nader Perroud
  • Roland Hasler
  • Tomas Ros
  • Christoph M. Michel
  • Camille Piguet

This body of work demonstrates a consistent focus on neurophysiological markers and functional outcomes associated with ADHD and related mental health conditions. Their investigations often employ high-density EEG methods to explore brain connectivity and cognitive function.

Their publications collectively contribute to an understanding of executive function improvement, temporal dynamics of eye-gaze perception, and resting-state brain activity in both ADHD and personality disorders.

Best Publications

  • Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects.

    Norihiro Sadato;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Jordan Grafman;Vicente Ibañez

  • Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography.

    M.-P. Deiber;R.E. Passingham;J.G. Colebatch;K.J. Friston

  • Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects.

    J. G. Colebatch;M.-P. Deiber;R. E. Passingham;K. J. Friston

  • Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: a positron emission tomography study.

    M. P. Deiber;V. Ibanez;N. Sadato;M. Hallett

  • Neural networks for Braille reading by the blind.

    Norihiro Sadato;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Jordan Grafman;Marie Pierre Deiber

  • Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning : A PET study

    M. Honda;M.-P. Deiber;V. Ibanez;A. Pascual-Leone

  • Mesial Motor Areas in Self-Initiated Versus Externally Triggered Movements Examined With fMRI: Effect of Movement Type and Rate

    Marie Pierre Deiber;Manabu Honda;Vicente Ibañez;Norihiro Sadato

  • Cerebral processes related to visuomotor imagery and generation of simple finger movements studied with positron emission tomography.

    Marie-Pierre Deiber;Marie-Pierre Deiber;Vicente Ibañez;Manabu Honda;Norihiro Sadato

  • The preparation, execution and suppression of copied movements in the human brain

    M. Krams;M. F. S. Rushworth;M.-P. Deiber;R. S. J. Frackowiak

  • Frequency-Dependent Changes of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow during Finger Movements

    Norihiro Sadato;Vicente Ibañez;Marie-Pierre Deiber;Gregory Campbell

  • Electrical stimulation of precentral cortical area in the treatment of central pain: electrophysiological and PET study

    R. Peyron;L. Garcia-Larrea;M. P. Deiber;L. Cinotti

  • Distinction between Perceptual and Attentional Processing in Working Memory Tasks: A Study of Phase-locked and Induced Oscillatory Brain Dynamics

    Marie-Pierre Deiber;Pascal Missonnier;Olivier Bertrand;Gabriel Gold

  • Deficient activation of the motor cortical network in patients with writer’s cramp

    V. Ibáñez;N. Sadato;B. Karp;M.-P. Deiber

  • Thalamic stimulation and suppression of parkinsonian tremor. Evidence of a cerebellar deactivation using positron emission tomography.

    Marie-Pierre Deiber;Pierre Pollak;Richard Passingham;Patricia Landais

  • Frontal and Parietal Networks for Conditional Motor Learning: A Positron Emission Tomography Study

    M.-P. Deiber;S. P. Wise;M. Honda;M. J. Catalan

  • Frequency-dependent changes of regional cerebral blood flow during finger movements: functional MRI compared to PET.

    Norihiro Sadato;Vicente Ibañez;Gregory Campbell;Marie-Pierre Deiber

  • Frontal theta event-related synchronization: comparison of directed attention and working memory load effects

    P. Missonnier;M.-P. Deiber;G. Gold;P. Millet

  • Sequential mapping favours the hypothesis of distinct generators for Na and Pa middle latency auditory evoked potentials.

    M.P. Deiber;V. Ibañez;C. Fischer;F. Perrin

  • A controlled positron emission tomography study of obsessive and neutral auditory stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder with checking rituals

    Jean Cottraux;Daniel Gérard;Luc Cinotti;Jean-Claude Froment

  • Working memory load–related electroencephalographic parameters can differentiate progressive from stable mild cognitive impairment

    Pascal Missonnier;M. P. Deiber;M. P. Deiber;Gabriel Gold;François Herrmann

  • A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of cortical regions associated with motor task execution and motor ideation in humans

    Marc Leonardo;Marc Leonardo;Jordan Fieldman;Jordan Fieldman;Norihiro Sadato;Gregory Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Vicente Ibáñez
Vicente Ibáñez University of Geneva
Nader Perroud
Nader Perroud University of Geneva
Panteleimon Giannakopoulos
Panteleimon Giannakopoulos University of Geneva
François Herrmann
François Herrmann University of Geneva
Gregor Thut
Gregor Thut Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Richard E. Passingham
Richard E. Passingham University of Oxford
François Mauguière
François Mauguière Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Roberto Caldara
Roberto Caldara University of Fribourg
Alan J. Pegna
Alan J. Pegna University of Queensland
Mark Hallett
Mark Hallett National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, exploring related fields through online study can open up versatile career opportunities in mental health, therapy, and research. Many students choose to begin with a psychology degree online, which provides a solid foundation in behavioral science and cognitive processes.

For those considering clinical roles, options include flexible graduate programs. If you’re curious about advanced social work careers, you may wonder how long does it take to get a msw online—typically 1-3 years depending on your schedule and prior education.

If your goal is a doctorate, there are reputable online psych d programs that prepare graduates for professional practice in psychology, blending theoretical instruction with required clinical placements.

For faster entry into therapy roles, some students prefer accelerated mft programs, which can be completed in less time than traditional degrees and lead to licensure as a marriage and family therapist.

Choosing the right pathway depends on your interests, career goals, and how quickly you wish to enter the workforce. Online study options bring flexibility and accessibility, making them increasingly popular for today’s aspiring neuroscience and mental health professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Marie-Pierre Deiber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles