World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
9201
World Ranking
8118
National Ranking
91

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
10510
World Ranking
7071
National Ranking
165

Roberto Caldara publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Caldara sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 249 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Roberto Caldara D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Caldara sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roberto Caldara is affiliated with the University of Fribourg in Switzerland. Their research primarily explores the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. The work also intersects with computer vision and pattern recognition, social psychology, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

Their research topics cover a variety of aspects related to perception and cognition, including face recognition and perception, face recognition and analysis, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, multisensory perception and integration, visual perception and processing mechanisms, visual attention and saliency detection, and neural dynamics and brain function.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Roberto Caldara include:

  • Normative data for two challenging tests of face matching under ecological conditions, 2020, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • The recognition of facial expressions of emotion in deaf and hearing individuals, 2021, Heliyon
  • Tailoring assistive smart glasses according to pathologies of visually impaired individuals: an exploratory investigation on social needs and difficulties experienced by visually impaired individuals, 2021, Universal Access in the Information Society
  • In pursuit of visual attention: SSVEP frequency-tagging moving targets, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Cultural Differences in Inhibitory Control: An ALE Meta-Analysis, 2023, Brain Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Roberto Caldara include:

  • Lisa Stacchi
  • Anne-Raphaëlle Richoz
  • Nayla Sokhn
  • Peter de Lissa
  • Pauline Schaller

Publications are often featured in venues such as:

  • Journal of Vision
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS ONE
  • Boletín de la Asociación Española de Entomología/Boletín de la Asociación Española de Entomología/Suplementos del Boletín de la Asociación Española de Entomología
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications

Best Publications

  • Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal

    Rachael E. Jack;Oliver G. B. Garrod;Hui Yu;Roberto Caldara

  • A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing.

    Bruno Rossion;Roberto Caldara;Mohamed Seghier;Anne-Marie Schuller

  • Culture shapes how we look at faces.

    Caroline Blais;Caroline Blais;Rachael E. Jack;Christoph Scheepers;Daniel Fiset;Daniel Fiset

  • Cultural confusions show that facial expressions are not universal.

    Rachael E. Jack;Caroline Blais;Christoph Scheepers;Philippe G. Schyns

  • Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race

    Caroline Michel;Bruno Rossion;Jaehyun Han;Chan-Sup Chung

  • Internal representations reveal cultural diversity in expectations of facial expressions of emotion.

    Rachael E. Jack;Roberto Caldara;Philippe G. Schyns

  • Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces

    Caroline Michel;Roberto Caldara;Bruno Rossion

  • Impaired Face Discrimination in Acquired Prosopagnosia Is Associated with Abnormal Response to Individual Faces in the Right Middle Fusiform Gyrus

    Christine Schiltz;Bettina Sorger;Roberto Caldara;Fatima Ahmed

  • Event-related potentials and time course of the "other-race" face classification advantage.

    Roberto Caldara;Bruno Rossion;Pierre Bovet;Claude-Alain Hauert

  • Does Prosopagnosia Take the Eyes Out of Face Representations? Evidence for a Defect in Representing Diagnostic Facial Information following Brain Damage

    Roberto Caldara;Philippe Schyns;Eugène Mayer;Marie L. Smith

  • Putting culture under the 'spotlight' reveals universal information use for face recognition.

    Roberto Caldara;Xinyue Zhou;Sebastien R Miellet

  • Face versus non-face object perception and the 'other-race' effect: a spatio-temporal event-related potential study.

    R Caldara;G Thut;P Servoir;C.M Michel

  • Mapping the development of facial expression recognition.

    Helen Rodger;Luca Vizioli;Xinyi Ouyang;Roberto Caldara

  • iMap: A novel method for statistical fixation mapping of eye movement data.

    Roberto Caldara;Sebastien R Miellet

  • Phenotypic clustering of lamin A/C mutations in neuromuscular patients

    S. Benedetti;I. Menditto;M. Degano;C. Rodolico

  • Neural repetition suppression to identity is abolished by other-race faces.

    Luca Vizioli;Guillaume A. Rousselet;Roberto Caldara;Roberto Caldara

  • Inverting faces elicits sensitivity to race on the N170 component: A cross-cultural study

    Luca Vizioli;Kay Foreman;Guillaume A. Rousselet;Roberto Caldara

  • Mapping Face Recognition Information Use across Cultures

    Sebastien R Miellet;Luca Vizioli;Lingnan He;Xinyue Zhou

  • Culture shapes eye movements for visually homogeneous objects.

    David J Kelly;Sebastien R Miellet;Roberto Caldara

  • Actual and mental motor preparation and execution: a spatiotemporal ERP study

    Roberto Caldara;Marie-Pierre Deiber;Carine Andrey;Christoph M. Michel

  • Beyond smiles: The impact of culture and race in embodying and decoding facial expressions

    Roberto Caldara

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe G. Schyns
Philippe G. Schyns University of Glasgow
Bruno Rossion
Bruno Rossion University of Lorraine
Olivier Pascalis
Olivier Pascalis Grenoble Alpes University
David J. Kelly
David J. Kelly University of Sheffield
Christoph Scheepers
Christoph Scheepers University of Glasgow
Marie-Pierre Deiber
Marie-Pierre Deiber University of Geneva
Guillaume A. Rousselet
Guillaume A. Rousselet University of Glasgow
Mohamed L. Seghier
Mohamed L. Seghier Khalifa University
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel Maastricht University
Bettina Sorger
Bettina Sorger Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to related fields and flexible education options. Many prospective students look for affordable routes like cheapest psyd programs, which open doors to clinical and counseling careers. Others prefer practical degrees that allow for supporting families and relationships, such as accelerated marriage and family therapy programs, letting graduates advance quickly.

Time is another important factor. For those eager to enter the workforce, accelerated programs online can provide a bachelor’s degree in a shorter time frame compared to traditional routes. If earning potential is a priority, consider exploring 4 year degrees that pay well, which can pave the way to lucrative science and healthcare careers.

Each pathway has unique benefits and requirements. Explore these options to find a program that aligns with your career aspirations and fits your lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Caldara

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles