World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
14620
World Ranking
3679
National Ranking
21

Olivier Pascalis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Pascalis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 199 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Olivier Pascalis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Pascalis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olivier Pascalis is affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France and specializes in research primarily within the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans several interconnected subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, computer vision and pattern recognition, and cultural studies.

Their research focuses on key topics such as face recognition and perception, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, multisensory perception and integration, child and animal learning development, visual perception and processing mechanisms, face recognition and analysis, and categorization, perception, and language.

Pascalis has contributed multiple papers to academic literature, with notable recent publications including:

  • Development of face processing: are there critical or sensitive periods? (2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences)
  • The recognition of facial expressions of emotion in deaf and hearing individuals (2021, Heliyon)
  • A developmental investigation of the other-race categorization advantage in a multiracial population: Contrasting social categorization and perceptual expertise accounts (2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology)
  • When novelty prevails on familiarity: Visual biases for child versus infant faces in 3.5- to 12-month-olds (2021, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology)
  • Language familiarity influences own-race face recognition in 9- and 12-month-old infants (2021, Infancy)

Pascalis frequently publishes in venues including Infancy, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Journal of Vision, International Journal of Behavioral Development, and Vision Research. This reflects a consistent engagement with journals central to developmental psychology, perceptual processes, and cognitive development research.

The scientist collaborates often with a group of coauthors, including Mathilde Fort, Cristina I. Galusca, Paul C. Quinn, David Méary, and Olivier Clerc, each contributing to a significant number of publications alongside Pascalis.

Best Publications

  • Is Face Processing Species-Specific During the First Year of Life?

    Olivier Pascalis;Michelle de Haan;Charles A. Nelson

  • The Other-Race Effect Develops During Infancy Evidence of Perceptual Narrowing

    David J. Kelly;Paul C. Quinn;Alan M. Slater;Kang Lee

  • Representation of the Gender of Human Faces by Infants: A Preference for Female

    Paul C Quinn;Joshua Yahr;Abbie Kuhn;Alan M Slater

  • Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces

    David J. Kelly;Paul C. Quinn;Alan M. Slater;Kang Lee

  • Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants

    Michelle De Haan;Olivier Pascalis;Mark H. Johnson

  • Mother's face recognition by neonates: A replication and an extension

    Olivier Pascalis;Scania de Schonen;John Morton;Christine Deruelle

  • Plasticity of face processing in infancy

    O. Pascalis;L. S. Scott;D. J. Kelly;R. W. Shannon

  • Development of the other-race effect during infancy: Evidence toward universality?

    David J. Kelly;Shaoying Liu;Kang Lee;Paul C. Quinn

  • A Domain-General Theory of the Development of Perceptual Discrimination

    Lisa S. Scott;Olivier Pascalis;Charles A. Nelson

  • Cross-Race Preferences for Same-Race Faces Extend Beyond the African Versus Caucasian Contrast in 3-Month-Old Infants.

    David J. Kelly;Shaoying Liu;Liezhong Ge;Paul C. Quinn

  • Recognition memory in 3- to 4-day-old human neonates

    O Pascalis;S de Schonen

  • Long-Term Recognition Memory for Faces Assessed by Visual Paired Comparison in 3- and 6-Month-Old Infants

    Olivier Pascalis;Michelle de Haan;Charles A. Nelson;Scania de Schonen

  • Face recognition in primates: a cross-species study

    Olivier Pascalis;Jocelyne Bachevalier

  • The Origins of Face Processing in Humans: Phylogeny and Ontogeny.

    Olivier Pascalis;David J. Kelly

  • Categorization, categorical perception, and asymmetry in infants' representation of face race.

    Gizelle Anzures;Paul C. Quinn;Olivier Pascalis;Alan M. Slater

  • Perceptual training prevents the emergence of the other race effect during infancy.

    Michelle Heron-Delaney;Gizelle Anzures;Jane S. Herbert;Paul C. Quinn

  • Developmental Origins of the Other-Race Effect:

    Gizelle Anzures;Paul C. Quinn;Olivier Pascalis;Alan M. Slater

  • Spontaneous voice–face identity matching by rhesus monkeys for familiar conspecifics and humans

    Julia Sliwa;Jean-René Duhamel;Olivier Pascalis;Sylvia Wirth

  • Independent component analysis reveals atypical electroencephalographic activity during visual perception in individuals with autism.

    Elizabeth Milne;Elizabeth Milne;Alison Scope;Olivier Pascalis;David Buckley

  • Two faces of the other-race effect: recognition and categorisation of Caucasian and Chinese faces.

    Liezhong Ge;Hongchuan Zhang;Zhe Wang;Paul C Quinn

  • Brief daily exposures to Asian females reverses perceptual narrowing for Asian faces in Caucasian infants

    Gizelle Anzures;Andrea Wheeler;Paul C. Quinn;Olivier Pascalis

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul C. Quinn
Paul C. Quinn University of Delaware
Kang Lee
Kang Lee University of Toronto
Alan Slater
Alan Slater University of Exeter
James W. Tanaka
James W. Tanaka University of Victoria
David J. Kelly
David J. Kelly University of Sheffield
Michael J. Coleman
Michael J. Coleman Brigham and Women's Hospital
Roberto Caldara
Roberto Caldara University of Fribourg
Edouard Gentaz
Edouard Gentaz University of Geneva
Ruth Campbell
Ruth Campbell University College London
Odile Petit
Odile Petit Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees offers great flexibility for students planning to pursue varied career pathways in mental health, counseling, and therapy. Many online programs provide foundational knowledge essential for further specialization and licensure as a therapist or counselor in the USA.

When considering a career as a therapist, it’s important to understand state-specific requirements. For example, Boston licensed therapist requirements emphasize acquiring a master’s degree in counseling and completing supervised practice hours. Similarly, students should learn about Buffalo licensed therapist education requirements, which also outline necessary graduate coursework and examinations for licensure.

Requirements can differ significantly across regions. For instance, if you’re interested in practicing in Arizona, review the process for how to become a licensed therapist in Chandler. Those considering North Carolina should learn about the pathway to becoming a licensed therapist in Charlotte to understand local expectations for education, exams, and supervised training.

Choosing the right online psychology degree can help set the groundwork for meeting these varied licensing criteria and pursuing a rewarding mental health career.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier Pascalis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles