World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daphne Maurer

Daphne Maurer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2061 1870 121 109 265 19773

Daphne Maurer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daphne Maurer between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daphne Maurer published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2010. 4 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2010. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 8 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 37 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1969 2025

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daphne Maurer: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 3
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 3
1980 2
1981 4
1982 2
1983 3
1984 3
1985 1
1986 8
1987 2
1988 2
1989 4
1990 2
1991 1
1992 3
1993 5
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 3
1998 3
1999 8
2000 3
2001 7
2002 5
2003 6
2004 10
2005 8
2006 9
2007 5
2008 6
2009 8
2010 37
2011 15
2012 15
2013 13
2014 15
2015 8
2016 8
2017 11
2018 4
2019 4
2020 5
2021 6
2022 3
2023 4
2024 3
2025 1
Total 289
Download as CSV

Daphne Maurer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daphne Maurer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 265 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 265
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daphne Maurer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daphne Maurer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Daphne Maurer is affiliated with McMaster University in Canada and has focused their research across several fields including Neuroscience, Medicine, and Psychology. Their work frequently intersects with subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Sensory Systems.

The main topics addressed in Maurer's research include:

  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Retinal Development and Disorders

Maurer has contributed to numerous publications, with recent papers including:

  • Critical Periods in Vision Revisited, 2022, Annual Review of Vision Science
  • Socioeconomic Status and Vision Care Services in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Cohort Study, 2021, The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Reduced perceptual narrowing in synesthesia, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review, 2021, Canadian Journal of Public Health
  • Feasibility of a school-based vision screening program to detect undiagnosed visual problems in kindergarten children in Ontario, 2020, Canadian Medical Association Journal

Frequent coauthors of Maurer include:

  • Agnes Wong
  • Afua O. Asare
  • Wendy J. Ungar
  • Natasha Saunders
  • Olivier Collignon

Key publication venues for Maurer are:

  • Canadian Journal of Public Health
  • Annual Review of Vision Science
  • The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal

Maurer has authored at least one book published by Cambridge University Press titled The Cambridge Handbook of Infant Development (2020).

The researcher was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • The many faces of configural processing

    Daphne Maurer;Richard Le Grand;Catherine J. Mondloch

  • Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing

    Catherine J Mondloch;Richard Le Grand;Daphne Maurer

  • Neuroperception. Early visual experience and face processing.

    Richard Le Grand;Catherine J. Mondloch;Daphne Maurer;Henry P. Brent

  • The Shape of Boubas: Sound-Shape Correspondences in Toddlers and Adults

    Daphne Maurer;Thanujeni Pathman;Thanujeni Pathman;Catherine J. Mondloch

  • Multiple sensitive periods in human visual development: evidence from visually deprived children.

    Terri L. Lewis;Daphne Maurer

  • Developmental changes in the scanning of faces by young infants.

    Daphne Maurer;Philip Salapatek

  • Face Perception During Early Infancy

    Catherine J. Mondloch;Terri L. Lewis;D. Robert Budreau;Daphne Maurer

  • The perception of facial expressions by the three-month-old.

    Maria E. Barrera;Daphne Maurer

  • Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy

    Richard Le Grand;Catherine J Mondloch;Daphne Maurer;Daphne Maurer;Henry P Brent

  • Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation

    Richard Le Grand;Catherine J. Mondloch;Daphne Maurer;Henry P. Brent

  • Perceptual Narrowing During Infancy: A Comparison of Language and Faces

    Daphne Maurer;Janet F. Werker

  • Neonatal Synesthesia: Implications for the Processing of Speech And Faces

    D. Maurer

  • Developmental changes in face processing skills

    Catherine J Mondloch;Sybil Geldart;Daphne Maurer;Richard Le Grand

  • Development of spatial and temporal vision during childhood

    Dave Ellemberg;Terri L. Lewis;Terri L. Lewis;Chang Hong Liu;Daphne Maurer

  • What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia

    Richard Le Grand;Philip A. Cooper;Catherine J. Mondloch;Catherine J. Mondloch;Terri L. Lewis

  • Do small white balls squeak? Pitch-object correspondences in young children.

    Catherine J. Mondloch;Daphne Maurer

  • Recognition of individual faces and average face prototypes by 1- and 3-month-old infants

    Michelle de Haan;Mark H Johnson;Daphne Maurer;David I Perrett

  • Influence of intensity on children's sensitivity to happy, sad, and fearful facial expressions.

    Xiaoqing Gao;Daphne Maurer

  • A happy story: Developmental changes in children's sensitivity to facial expressions of varying intensities

    Xiaoqing Gao;Daphne Maurer

  • Recognition of Mother's Photographed Face by the Three-Month-Old Infant.

    Maria E. Barrera;Daphne Maurer

Frequent Co-Authors

Terri L. Lewis
Terri L. Lewis McMaster University
Catherine J. Mondloch
Catherine J. Mondloch Brock University
Gillian Rhodes
Gillian Rhodes University of Western Australia
Olivier Collignon
Olivier Collignon Université Catholique de Louvain
Franco Lepore
Franco Lepore University of Montreal
David I. Shore
David I. Shore McMaster University
Linda Jeffery
Linda Jeffery Curtin University
Takao K. Hensch
Takao K. Hensch Harvard University
Hugh R. Wilson
Hugh R. Wilson York University
Louis A. Schmidt
Louis A. Schmidt McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology programs in the U.S. opens up flexible study options and diverse career paths. Many accredited universities now offer robust online degrees, making it easier to balance education with work or family commitments. Prospective students can compare the best online psychology degree rankings in USA to find programs known for quality, faculty expertise, and graduate success.

Regional choices also matter. For example, learners in Wisconsin might research the best online psychology degree programs ranking in Wisconsin. On-campus or hybrid options, like those featured in the top psychology programs in Albany or the best psychology program rankings in Arlington, also provide valuable specialized tracks.

As the need for mental health professionals grows, online degrees prepare students for roles in counseling, human resources, research, and more. When choosing a program, consider your personal career ambitions, state licensure requirements, and program reputation to guide your decision.

Best Scientists Citing Daphne Maurer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles