World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Catherine J. Mondloch

Catherine J. Mondloch

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
11919
World Ranking
6840
National Ranking
457

Catherine J. Mondloch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine J. Mondloch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 155 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Catherine J. Mondloch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine J. Mondloch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catherine J. Mondloch is affiliated with Brock University in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of neuroscience and psychology, with specific expertise in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. The core areas of study encompass face recognition and perception, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, as well as a range of subtopics connected to visual and emotional processing.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Subfields of study consist of:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

The primary topics of research work are:

  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Face recognition and analysis
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection

Catherine J. Mondloch has contributed to numerous publications across various prominent venues. Frequent publication locations include:

  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • British Journal of Psychology
  • Perception
  • Cognition
  • Scientific Reports

Recent papers authored or co-authored by this researcher span topics related to face perception and the cognitive mechanisms underlying social judgments. Notable papers include:

  • The dimensions underlying first impressions of older adult faces are similar, but not identical, for young and older adult perceivers (2022), British Journal of Psychology
  • Similar use of shape and texture cues for own- and other-race faces during face learning and recognition (2021), Vision Research
  • Mandatory First Impressions: Happy Expressions Increase Trustworthiness Ratings of Subsequent Neutral Images (2021), Perception
  • First impressions of child faces: Facial trustworthiness influences adults' interpretations of children's behavior in ambiguous situations (2021), Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Face masks have a limited influence on first impressions: evidence from three experiments (2022), Perception

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Kristen Baker
  • Claire M. Matthews
  • Sophia M. Thierry
  • Anita C. Twele
  • Vincent J. Stabile

Best Publications

  • The many faces of configural processing

    Daphne Maurer;Richard Le Grand;Catherine J. Mondloch

  • Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing

    Catherine J Mondloch;Richard Le Grand;Daphne Maurer

  • Neuroperception. Early visual experience and face processing.

    Richard Le Grand;Catherine J. Mondloch;Daphne Maurer;Henry P. Brent

  • The Shape of Boubas: Sound-Shape Correspondences in Toddlers and Adults

    Daphne Maurer;Thanujeni Pathman;Thanujeni Pathman;Catherine J. Mondloch

  • Facial Structure Is a Reliable Cue of Aggressive Behavior

    Justin M. Carré;Cheryl M. McCormick;Catherine J. Mondloch

  • Face Perception During Early Infancy

    Catherine J. Mondloch;Terri L. Lewis;D. Robert Budreau;Daphne Maurer

  • Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy

    Richard Le Grand;Catherine J Mondloch;Daphne Maurer;Daphne Maurer;Henry P Brent

  • Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation

    Richard Le Grand;Catherine J. Mondloch;Daphne Maurer;Henry P. Brent

  • Developmental changes in face processing skills

    Catherine J Mondloch;Sybil Geldart;Daphne Maurer;Richard Le Grand

  • What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia

    Richard Le Grand;Philip A. Cooper;Catherine J. Mondloch;Catherine J. Mondloch;Terri L. Lewis

  • Do small white balls squeak? Pitch-object correspondences in young children.

    Catherine J. Mondloch;Daphne Maurer

  • Missing sights: consequences for visual cognitive development.

    Daphne Maurer;Terri L. Lewis;Terri L. Lewis;Catherine J. Mondloch;Catherine J. Mondloch

  • Becoming a Face Expert

    Catherine J. Mondloch;Daphne Maurer;Sara Ahola

  • Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing.

    D. Maurer;K.M. O’Craven;R. Le Grand;C.J. Mondloch

  • The effect of early visual deprivation on the development of face processing

    Sybil Geldart;Catherine J. Mondloch;Daphne Maurer;Scania de Schonen

  • Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman:: Factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features

    Catherine J. Mondloch;Kate S. Dobson;Julie Parsons;Daphne Maurer

  • Processes underlying the cross-race effect: an investigation of holistic, featural, and relational processing of own-race versus other-race faces.

    Catherine J Mondloch;Natalie Elms;Daphne Maurer;Gillian Rhodes

  • The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing

    Catherine J. Mondloch;Thanujeni Pathman;Daphne Maurer;Richard Le Grand

  • Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces

    Gillian Rhodes;Louise Ewing;William G. Hayward;Daphne Maurer

  • Estimating aggression from emotionally neutral faces: which facial cues are diagnostic?

    Justin M Carré;Mark D Morrissey;Catherine J Mondloch;Cheryl M McCormick

Frequent Co-Authors

Daphne Maurer
Daphne Maurer McMaster University
Terri L. Lewis
Terri L. Lewis McMaster University
Cheryl M. McCormick
Cheryl M. McCormick Brock University
Kang Lee
Kang Lee University of Toronto
Justin M. Carré
Justin M. Carré Nipissing University
Sidney J. Segalowitz
Sidney J. Segalowitz Brock University
Cheryl L. Grady
Cheryl L. Grady University of Toronto
Gillian Rhodes
Gillian Rhodes University of Western Australia
Louis A. Schmidt
Louis A. Schmidt McMaster University
Beatrice de Gelder
Beatrice de Gelder Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and professional career pathways. Students interested in becoming mental health professionals often explore online bachelor's or master's degrees in psychology, counseling, or related fields. These degrees provide a strong foundation for advanced studies and eventual licensure.

If you're considering a career as a therapist, understanding state-specific requirements is crucial. For example, you can explore the El Paso licensed therapist education requirements to see what is needed in Texas. Likewise, the process of becoming a licensed therapist in Fort Wayne outlines the paths in Indiana, while steps for how to become a licensed therapist in Fort Worth provide more Texas-specific information. Those interested in California can refer to the guide on becoming a licensed therapist in Fremont.

Each state has unique educational, exam, and supervised experience requirements. Choosing an accredited online degree and understanding local licensure rules will help you build a successful career path in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine J. Mondloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles