World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 87 1093 960 50 48 276 26950

Gillian Rhodes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gillian Rhodes between 1984 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gillian Rhodes published across 38 years, from 1984 to 2021, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2010. 12 of the 287 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2010. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications
1984 2021

287 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gillian Rhodes: publications per year, 1984 to 2021
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 3
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 3
1990 3
1991 0
1992 1
1993 4
1994 1
1995 0
1996 6
1997 4
1998 3
1999 3
2000 4
2001 8
2002 9
2003 11
2004 10
2005 11
2006 8
2007 12
2008 8
2009 12
2010 29
2011 11
2012 4
2013 18
2014 17
2015 19
2016 9
2017 24
2018 6
2019 9
2020 7
2021 5
Total 287
Download as CSV

Gillian Rhodes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gillian Rhodes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 276 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 276
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gillian Rhodes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gillian Rhodes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 87
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gillian Rhodes is affiliated with the University of Western Australia in Australia. Their research spans neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their scholarly contributions also extend into clinical psychology, statistics, probability and uncertainty, and developmental and educational psychology.

The research topics explored in their work include:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Frequent publication venues for Gillian Rhodes highlight their engagement with leading scholarly outlets across psychology and neuroscience:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Rhodes include:

  • Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes (2020), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Accuracy in Facial Trustworthiness Impressions: Kernel of Truth or Modern Physiognomy? A Meta-Analysis (2021), Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Immune function during early adolescence positively predicts adult facial sexual dimorphism in both men and women (2020), Evolution and Human Behavior
  • An objective and reliable electrophysiological marker for implicit trustworthiness perception (2020), Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • Beyond Likert ratings: Improving the robustness of developmental research measurement using best-worst scaling (2021), Behavior Research Methods

Collaboration is an important aspect of their research profile, working frequently with the following coauthors:

  • Clare Sutherland
  • Nichola Burton
  • Jemma Collova
  • Romina Palermo
  • Yong Zhi Foo

Best Publications

  • The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.

    Gillian Rhodes

  • Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact.

    Romina Palermo;Gillian Rhodes

  • Facial symmetry and the perception of Beauty

    Gillian Rhodes;Fiona Proffitt;Jonathon M. Grady;Alex Sumich

  • What's lost in inverted faces?

    Gillian Rhodes;Susan Brake;Anthony P. Atkinson

  • Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success?

    Gillian Rhodes;Leigh W. Simmons;Marianne Peters

  • Identification and ratings of caricatures: implications for mental representations of faces.

    Gillian Rhodes;Susan Brennan;Susan Carey

  • Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health

    Gillian Rhodes;Janelle Chan;Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Leigh W. Simmons

  • Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.

    Gillian Rhodes;Susan Brake;Karyn Taylor;Shirley Tan

  • Fitting the Mind to the World: Face Adaptation and Attractiveness Aftereffects

    Gillian Rhodes;Linda Jeffery;Tamara L. Watson;Colin W.G. Clifford

  • Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty

    Gillian Rhodes;Sakiko Yoshikawa;Alison Clark;Kieran Lee

  • Averageness, Exaggeration, and Facial Attractiveness

    Gillian Rhodes;Tanya Tremewan

  • The effects of sex hormones on immune function: a meta-analysis.

    Yong Zhi Foo;Shinichi Nakagawa;Shinichi Nakagawa;Gillian Rhodes;Leigh W. Simmons

  • Looking Smart and Looking Good: Facial Cues to Intelligence and Their Origins

    L.A. Zebrowitz;J.A. Hall;N.A. Murphy;Gillian Rhodes

  • Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health

    Gillian Rhodes;Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Alison Clark;S. Michael Kalick

  • ARE AVERAGE FACIAL CONFIGURATIONS ATTRACTIVE ONLY BECAUSE OF THEIR SYMMETRY

    Gillian Rhodes;Alex Sumich;Graham Byatt

  • Looking at Faces: First-Order and Second-Order Features as Determinants of Facial Appearance

    Gillian Rhodes

  • SENSITIVITY TO ''BAD GENES'' AND THE ANOMALOUS FACE OVERGENERALIZATION EFFECT: CUE VALIDITY, CUE UTILIZATION, AND ACCURACY IN JUDGING INTELLIGENCE AND HEALTH

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Gillian Rhodes

  • Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive?

    Gillian Rhodes;Catherine Hickford;Linda Jeffery

  • A Comparative View of Face Perception

    David A. Leopold;Gillian Rhodes

  • Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity.

    Gillian Rhodes;Linda Jeffery

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Jeffery
Linda Jeffery Curtin University
Leigh W. Simmons
Leigh W. Simmons University of Western Australia
Romina Palermo
Romina Palermo University of Western Australia
Elizabeth Pellicano
Elizabeth Pellicano University College London
Andrew J. Calder
Andrew J. Calder University of Cambridge
Colin W. G. Clifford
Colin W. G. Clifford University of New South Wales
Elinor McKone
Elinor McKone Australian National University
Daphne Maurer
Daphne Maurer McMaster University
Leslie A. Zebrowitz
Leslie A. Zebrowitz Brandeis University
Jamin Halberstadt
Jamin Halberstadt University of Otago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring psychologists have a wealth of flexible study options in the USA, with many universities offering top-ranked distance learning opportunities. Choosing an online psychology master’s degree can be a convenient solution for those balancing work, family, or other commitments. Programs such as the best online psychology master's program rankings in Florida provide insight into reputable schools that deliver rigorous academic experiences in a virtual format.

Students should consider factors like accreditation, faculty support, and specialization options. Comparing offerings, such as the best online psychology master's program rankings in Kansas, helps identify programs that align with specific career goals. Many online curricula include research opportunities and clinical practicum placements—essential for future licensing or doctoral study.

There is also variety in geographic focus. For example, online psychology master's degrees in New York offer different concentrations and networking connections compared to the best online psychology program rankings in Pennsylvania. Graduates can pursue roles in counseling, human services, business, or research. No matter the state, online degrees open multiple pathways to meaningful psychology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Gillian Rhodes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles