World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
90
Citations
38243
World Ranking
939
National Ranking
113

Andrew J. Calder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Calder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Andrew J. Calder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Calder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew J. Calder was affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research was primarily situated within the field of neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics of their research included:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Their recent publications covered studies related to emotion recognition, depression symptoms, and fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions, as well as work associated with healthcare research. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Emotion recognition, symptoms of depression, and fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions," published in 2025 in Neuropsychologia
  • "David Tennent Baird," published in 2022 in BMJ

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Andrew J. Calder included:

  • Fionnuala C. Murphy
  • Nadene Dermody
  • Peter Watson
  • Sophie K. Scott
  • Polly V. Peers

The publication venues where this researcher frequently contributed were:

  • Neuropsychologia
  • BMJ

Best Publications

  • A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions

    J. S. Morris;C. D. Frith;D. I. Perrett;D. Rowland

  • A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust

    Mary Phillips;A W Young;C Senior;Michael Brammer

  • A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions

    J. S. Morris;K. J. Friston;C. Buchel;C. D. Frith

  • Neuropsychology of fear and loathing.

    Andrew J. Calder;Andrew David Lawrence;Andrew W. Young

  • Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage.

    R Adolphs;D Tranel;S Hamann;A.W Young

  • Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression

    Andrew J. Calder;Andrew W. Young

  • Impaired recognition and experience of disgust following brain injury.

    Andrew J. Calder;Jill Keane;Facundo Manes;Nagui Antoun

  • Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust

    Mary Phillips;A W Young;Sarah Scott;A J Calder

  • Facial emotion recognition after bilateral amygdala damage: Differentially severe impairment of fear

    A. J. Calder

  • Impaired auditory recognition of fear and anger following bilateral amygdala lesions

    Sophie K. Scott;Andrew W. Young;Andrew J. Calder;Deborah J. Hellawell

  • Individual Differences in Reward Drive Predict Neural Responses to Images of Food

    John D. Beaver;Andrew David Lawrence;Jenneke van Ditzhuijzen;Matt H. Davis

  • Configural information in facial expression perception.

    Andrew J. Calder;Andrew W. Young;Jill Keane;Michael Dean

  • Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition

    Andrew W. Young;Duncan Rowland;Andrew J. Calder;Nancy L. Etcoff

  • The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing

    Meredith A Shafto;Lorraine K Tyler;Marie Dixon;Jason R Taylor;Jason R Taylor

  • Loss of disgust. Perception of faces and emotions in Huntington's disease.

    Reiner Sprengelmeyer;Andrew W. Young;Andrew J. Calder;Anke Karnat

  • Facial expressions of emotion: Stimuli and tests (FEEST)

    Andrew W. Young;David Ian Perrett;A. J. Calder;Reiner Sprengelmeyer

  • A principal component analysis of facial expressions

    Andrew J Calder;A.Mike Burton;Paul Miller;Andrew W Young

  • Categorical perception of morphed facial expressions

    Andrew J. Calder;Andrew W. Young;David I. Perrett;Nancy L. Etcoff

  • Facial expression recognition across the adult life span.

    Andrew J Calder;Jill Keane;Tom Manly;Reiner Sprengelmeyer

  • Face processing impairments after encephalitis: amygdala damage and recognition of fear.

    Paul Broks;Paul Broks;Andrew W. Young;Elizabeth J. Maratos;Peter J. Coffey

  • The Oxford handbook of face perception

    Andrew J. Calder

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew W. Young
Andrew W. Young University of York
James B. Rowe
James B. Rowe University of Cambridge
Luca Passamonti
Luca Passamonti University of Cambridge
Andrew D. Lawrence
Andrew D. Lawrence Cardiff University
Graeme Fairchild
Graeme Fairchild University of Bath
Simon Baron-Cohen
Simon Baron-Cohen University of Cambridge
Gillian Rhodes
Gillian Rhodes University of Western Australia
Ian M. Goodyer
Ian M. Goodyer University of Cambridge
Richard N. Henson
Richard N. Henson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
David I. Perrett
David I. Perrett University of St Andrews

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to diverse online programs and rewarding career paths. In particular, becoming a licensed mental health counselor is a popular option for graduates. However, requirements for certification and practice can vary significantly by location.

For example, those interested in Durham mental health counselor certification requirements should be prepared for state-specific licensing exams and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, if you plan to become a mental health counselor in El Paso, understanding local education prerequisites and experience guidelines is essential.

Career seekers in Indiana should review the mental health counselor requirements in Fort Wayne before applying to relevant online programs. Meanwhile, Texas residents may want to learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Fort Worth for region-specific steps.

Researching these pathways will help you select the best online psychology degrees and prepare for successful licensure in your intended state.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Calder

Recently Published Articles