World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 127 400 379 240 225 586 59910
Psychology 128 185 162 115 99 576 63066
Neuroscience 129 289 260 176 155 581 63435
Medicine 129 2591 2418 1452 1335 568 63461

Mary L. Phillips publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary L. Phillips between 1952 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary L. Phillips published across 74 years, from 1952 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2019. 38 of the 643 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1952 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2019. 1952: 1 publication 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 21 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 29 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 14 publications
1952 2025

643 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary L. Phillips: publications per year, 1952 to 2025
Year Publications
1952 1
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 6
1997 10
1998 13
1999 3
2000 21
2001 18
2002 9
2003 29
2004 25
2005 13
2006 21
2007 18
2008 20
2009 17
2010 22
2011 14
2012 29
2013 32
2014 26
2015 24
2016 24
2017 28
2018 35
2019 40
2020 35
2021 27
2022 20
2023 17
2024 24
2025 14
Total 643
Download as CSV

Mary L. Phillips publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary L. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 571–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 576 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22 576
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary L. Phillips D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary L. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 128–129 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19 128
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Mary L. Phillips is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and has made extensive contributions to research in medicine, neuroscience, and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The researcher's primary topics of study cover functional brain connectivity investigations, bipolar disorder and its treatment, mental health topics, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, neural and behavioral psychology studies, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Mary L. Phillips has published extensively in several journals. Their most frequent publication venues include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Translational Psychiatry

Among their recent papers are:

  • What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Examining and Modulating Neural Circuits in Psychiatric Disorders With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography: Present Practices and Future Developments, 2021, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Realizing the Clinical Potential of Computational Psychiatry: Report From the Banbury Center Meeting, February 2019, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • Distinguishing between depression in bipolar disorder and unipolar depression using magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review, 2022, Bipolar Disorders
  • White matter abnormalities in adults with bipolar disorder type-II and unipolar depression, 2021, Scientific Reports

Mary L. Phillips has collaborated frequently with researchers including Amelia Versace, Richelle Stiffler, Michele A. Bertocci, Henry W. Chase, and Haris Aslam, indicating sustained partnerships spanning multiple publications.

Best Publications

  • Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception

    Mary L Phillips;Wayne C Drevets;Scott L Rauch;Richard Lane

  • A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust

    Mary Phillips;A W Young;C Senior;Michael Brammer

  • Neurobiology of emotion perception II: Implications for major psychiatric disorders

    Mary L Phillips;Wayne C Drevets;Scott L Rauch;Richard Lane

  • A neural model of voluntary and automatic emotion regulation: implications for understanding the pathophysiology and neurodevelopment of bipolar disorder.

    Mary L. Phillips;Cecile D. Ladouceur;Wayne C. Drevets;Wayne C. Drevets

  • Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites.

    Jean-Philippe Fortin;Nicholas C. Cullen;Yvette I. Sheline;Warren D. Taylor

  • The functional neuroanatomy of social behaviour: changes in cerebral blood flow when people with autistic disorder process facial expressions.

    H. D. Critchley;E. M. Daly;E. T. Bullmore;S. C. Williams

  • Major depressive disorder: new clinical, neurobiological, and treatment perspectives

    David J Kupfer;Ellen Frank;Mary L Phillips

  • Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust

    Mary Phillips;A W Young;Sarah Scott;A J Calder

  • Distinct Neural Correlates of Washing, Checking, and Hoarding Symptom Dimensions in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

    David Mataix-Cols;Sarah Wooderson;Natalia Lawrence;Michael J. Brammer

  • The neural correlates of anhedonia in major depressive disorder.

    Paul A. Keedwell;Chris Andrew;Steven C.R. Williams;Mick J. Brammer

  • The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data

    Paul M. Thompson;Jason L. Stein;Sarah E. Medland;Derrek P. Hibar

  • A differential pattern of neural response toward sad versus happy facial expressions in major depressive disorder.

    Simon Surguladze;Michael J. Brammer;Paul Keedwell;Vincent Giampietro

  • Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder : An MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

    D P Hibar;L T Westlye;L T Westlye;N T Doan;N T Doan;N Jahanshad

  • Bipolar disorder diagnosis: challenges and future directions

    Mary L Phillips;Mary L Phillips;David J Kupfer

  • A new meta-analytic method for neuroimaging studies that combines reported peak coordinates and statistical parametric maps

    Joaquim Radua;David Mataix-Cols;M. L. Phillips;M. L. Phillips;W. El-Hage

  • Annotation: Development of facial expression recognition from childhood to adolescence: behavioural and neurological perspectives

    Catherine Herba;Mary Phillips

  • Explicit and implicit neural mechanisms for processing of social information from facial expressions: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    H. Critchley;E. Daly;Mary L Phillips;M. Brammer

  • Recognition accuracy and response bias to happy and sad facial expressions in patients with major depression.

    Simon A. Surguladze;Andrew W. Young;Carl Senior;Gildas Brébion

  • Subcortical and ventral prefrontal cortical neural responses to facial expressions distinguish patients with bipolar disorder and major depression.

    Natalia S Lawrence;Andrew M Williams;Simon Surguladze;Vincent Giampietro

  • The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a consensus model.

    Stephen M Strakowski;Caleb M Adler;Jorge Almeida;Lori L Altshuler

  • Common and distinct patterns of grey-matter volume alteration in major depression and bipolar disorder: evidence from voxel-based meta-analysis

    T Wise;J Radua;J Radua;E Via;N Cardoner

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge R. C. Almeida
Jorge R. C. Almeida The University of Texas at Austin
Michael Brammer
Michael Brammer King's College London
Anthony S. David
Anthony S. David University College London
Boris Birmaher
Boris Birmaher University of Pittsburgh
Cecile D. Ladouceur
Cecile D. Ladouceur University of Pittsburgh
Vincent Giampietro
Vincent Giampietro King's College London
Natalia Lawrence
Natalia Lawrence University of Exeter
Christopher Andrew
Christopher Andrew King's College London
Myrna M. Weissman
Myrna M. Weissman Columbia University
Carl Senior
Carl Senior Aston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology degree? The rise of flexible, online learning options means students can access quality education regardless of their location. Numerous institutions across the USA now offer accredited online psychology degrees, providing a solid foundation for careers in counseling, research, social services, human resources, and more.

When exploring your options, it’s helpful to examine regional programs for insights into curriculum strengths and reputation. For example, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Raleigh highlights schools with robust faculty and research opportunities in North Carolina. Similarly, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Reno showcases universities in Nevada known for flexible study options.

Those looking at other regions can reference the top psychology degrees in South Dakota for insights into affordable public universities, or the best psychology degree rankings in Shreveport to learn about programs in Louisiana. Each pathway can lead to roles in therapy, education, healthcare, and more, with online study offering added flexibility for working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Mary L. Phillips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles