World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
148
Citations
74570
World Ranking
156
National Ranking
24

Michael Brammer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Brammer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 609 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael Brammer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Brammer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 148 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Brammer is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine and neuroscience, with specific interests in pharmacology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as pediatrics, perinatology and child health.

The scientist's research topics include cannabis and cannabinoid research, schizophrenia research and treatment, functional brain connectivity studies, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, bipolar disorder and treatment, advanced MRI techniques and applications, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Michael Brammer has contributed to various publication venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Autism
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "A single dose of cannabidiol modulates medial temporal and striatal function during fear processing in people at clinical high risk for psychosis" (2020, Translational Psychiatry)
  • "Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity Accurately Distinguishes Cases With Psychotic Disorders From Healthy Controls, Based on Cortical Features Associated With Brain Network Development" (2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging)
  • "Altered relationship between cortisol response to social stress and mediotemporal function during fear processing in people at clinical high risk for psychosis: a preliminary report" (2021, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience)
  • "Patterns of connectome variability in autism across five functional activation tasks: findings from the LEAP project" (2022, Molecular Autism)
  • "Effects of cannabidiol on symptoms in people at clinical high risk for psychosis" (2024, World Psychiatry)

Frequent collaborators with Michael Brammer include Philip McGuire, Sagnik Bhattacharyya, Jesús Pérez, Cathy Davies, and Robin Wilson. These repeated collaborations suggest ongoing research partnerships in related areas of study.

Best Publications

  • A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust

    Mary Phillips;A W Young;C Senior;Michael Brammer

  • Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: an fMRI study.

    Simon Baron‐Cohen;Howard A. Ring;Sally Wheelwright;Edward T. Bullmore;Edward T. Bullmore

  • Society for Neuroscience Abstracts

    G A Calvert;E Bullmore;Michael Brammer;R Bilder

  • Activation of Auditory Cortex During Silent Lipreading

    Gemma A. Calvert;Edward T. Bullmore;Michael J. Brammer;Ruth Campbell

  • Hypofrontality in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during higher-order motor control: a study with functional MRI.

    Katya Rubia;Stephan Overmeyer;Eric Taylor;Michael Brammer

  • Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks.

    Katya Rubia;Tamara Russell;Stephan Overmeyer;Michael J. Brammer

  • Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain

    E.T. Bullmore;J. Suckling;S. Overmeyer;S. Rabe-Hesketh

  • Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

    Gemma A. Calvert;Ruth Campbell;Michael J. Brammer

  • Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust

    Mary Phillips;A W Young;Sarah Scott;A J Calder

  • Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection

    Katya Rubia;Anna B Smith;Michael J Brammer;Eric Taylor

  • Distinct Neural Correlates of Washing, Checking, and Hoarding Symptom Dimensions in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

    David Mataix-Cols;Sarah Wooderson;Natalia Lawrence;Michael J. Brammer

  • Predictors of amygdala activation during the processing of emotional stimuli: A meta-analysis of 385 PET and fMRI studies.

    Sergi G. Costafreda;Michael J. Brammer;Anthony S. David;Cynthia H.Y. Fu

  • Attenuation of the neural response to sad faces in major depression by antidepressant treatment: a prospective, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Cynthia H. Y. Fu;Steven C. R. Williams;Anthony J. Cleare;Michael J. Brammer

  • Mapping auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia using functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Sukhwinder Shergill;Michael Brammer;Steven Williams;Robin Murray

  • Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis

    Edward Bullmore;Michael Brammer;Steve C. R. Williams;Sophia Rabe-Hesketh

  • The neural correlates of anhedonia in major depressive disorder.

    Paul A. Keedwell;Chris Andrew;Steven C.R. Williams;Mick J. Brammer

  • A differential pattern of neural response toward sad versus happy facial expressions in major depressive disorder.

    Simon Surguladze;Michael J. Brammer;Paul Keedwell;Vincent Giampietro

  • Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event-related tasks of cognitive control.

    Katya Rubia;Anna B. Smith;James Woolley;Chiara Nosarti

  • Functional frontalisation with age: mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI

    K Rubia;S Overmeyer;E Taylor;M Brammer

  • CNVs conferring risk of autism or schizophrenia affect cognition in controls

    Hreinn Stefansson;Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg;Stacy Steinberg;Brynja Magnusdottir

  • Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: Resampling methods in time and wavelet domains

    Ed Bullmore;Ed Bullmore;Chris Long;John Suckling;Jalal Fadili

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincent Giampietro
Vincent Giampietro King's College London
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Mary L. Phillips
Mary L. Phillips University of Pittsburgh
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Anthony S. David
Anthony S. David University College London
Andrew Simmons
Andrew Simmons King's College London
Katya Rubia
Katya Rubia King's College London
Christopher Andrew
Christopher Andrew King's College London
Robin M. Murray
Robin M. Murray King's College London
Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael Brammer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles