World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Animal Science and Veterinary
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 90 33 32 13 12 397 37693

George C. Fahey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by George C. Fahey between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. George C. Fahey published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 1991. 6 of the 414 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 1991. 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 7 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 17 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 15 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 14 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 19 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1976 2025

414 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
George C. Fahey: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 2
1977 0
1978 1
1979 7
1980 5
1981 7
1982 9
1983 17
1984 8
1985 15
1986 9
1987 14
1988 10
1989 5
1990 7
1991 19
1992 4
1993 5
1994 10
1995 11
1996 8
1997 9
1998 7
1999 7
2000 5
2001 7
2002 12
2003 9
2004 14
2005 11
2006 9
2007 12
2008 12
2009 14
2010 13
2011 19
2012 15
2013 18
2014 9
2015 8
2016 9
2017 3
2018 1
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
2022 3
2023 2
2024 4
2025 2
Total 414
Download as CSV

George C. Fahey publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George C. Fahey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 394–398 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 397 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5 397
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

George C. Fahey D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George C. Fahey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 77+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100 90
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in United States Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in United States Leader Award
  • 2003 - Corbin Award in Companion Animal Biology, American Society of Animal Science
  • 1990 - American Feed Industry Association Award in Ruminant Nutrition Research, American Society of Animal Science

Overview

George C. Fahey is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily spans Medicine and Nursing, with a specialized focus on Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics covered in their body of work include:

  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Food composition and properties
  • Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management

Fahey's publication record features frequent contributions to several prominent journals, including:

  • Journal of Animal Science
  • BMJ
  • Journal of Renal Nutrition
  • Advances in Nutrition
  • Translational Animal Science

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Fahey include:

  • "Fibre intake for optimal health: how can healthcare professionals support people to reach dietary recommendations?", 2022, BMJ
  • "Effect of Dietary Inulin Supplementation on the Gut Microbiota Composition and Derived Metabolites of Individuals Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Pilot Study", 2021, Journal of Renal Nutrition
  • "Perspective: Assessing Tolerance to Nondigestible Carbohydrate Consumption", 2022, Advances in Nutrition
  • "Use of biotics in animals: impact on nutrition, health, and food production", 2025, Journal of Animal Science
  • "ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: RUMINANT/NONRUMINANT FEED COMPOSITION: Challenges and opportunities associated with creating large feed composition tables", 2020, Journal of Animal Science

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Joanne Slavin
  • Laura Bauer
  • Kelly S. Swanson
  • Hannah D. Holscher
  • Nicola M. McKeown

Throughout their career, Fahey has received awards recognizing contributions to animal science and nutrition research, including:

  • Corbin Award in Companion Animal Biology, American Society of Animal Science, 2003
  • American Feed Industry Association Award in Ruminant Nutrition Research, American Society of Animal Science, 1990

Best Publications

  • AIN-93 Purified Diets for Laboratory Rodents: Final Report of the American Institute of Nutrition Ad Hoc Writing Committee on the Reformulation of the AIN-76A Rodent Diet

    Philip G. Reeves;Forrest H. Nielsen;George C. Fahey

  • Viscosity as Related to Dietary Fiber: A Review

    Cheryl L. Dikeman;George C. Fahey

  • Consumption of cereal fiber, mixtures of whole grains and bran, and whole grains and risk reduction in type 2 diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease

    Susan S Cho;Lu Qi;George C Fahey;David M Klurfeld

  • Phylogenetic and gene-centric metagenomics of the canine intestinal microbiome reveals similarities with humans and mice

    Kelly S Swanson;Scot E Dowd;Jan S Suchodolski;Ingmar S Middelbos

  • Nutritional Responses to the Presence of Inulin and Oligofructose in the Diets of Domesticated Animals: A Review

    Elizabeth A. Flickinger;Jan Van Loo;George C. Fahey

  • Chemical and nutritional properties of soybean carbohydrates as related to nonruminants: A review

    L.K. Karr-Lilienthal;C.T. Kadzere;C.M. Grieshop;G.C. Fahey

  • Dietary Fibers Affect Viscosity of Solutions and Simulated Human Gastric and Small Intestinal Digesta

    Cheryl L. Dikeman;Michael R. Murphy;George C. Fahey

  • Supplemental Fructooligosaccharides and Mannanoligosaccharides Influence Immune Function, Ileal and Total Tract Nutrient Digestibilities, Microbial Populations and Concentrations of Protein Catabolites in the Large Bowel of Dogs

    Kelly S. Swanson;Christine M. Grieshop;Elizabeth A. Flickinger;Laura L. Bauer

  • Phylogenetic Characterization of Fecal Microbial Communities of Dogs Fed Diets with or without Supplemental Dietary Fiber Using 454 Pyrosequencing

    Ingmar S. Middelbos;Brittany M. Vester Boler;Ani Qu;Bryan A. White

  • Dietary galactooligosaccharides affect ileal and total-tract nutrient digestibility, ileal and fecal bacterial concentrations, and ileal fermentative characteristics of growing pigs.

    M. R. Smiricky-Tjardes;C. M. Grieshop;E. A. Flickinger;L. L. Bauer

  • 454 Pyrosequencing Reveals a Shift in Fecal Microbiota of Healthy Adult Men Consuming Polydextrose or Soluble Corn Fiber

    Seema Hooda;Brittany M. Vester Boler;Mariana C. Rossoni Serao;Jennifer M. Brulc

  • Nutrient digestibilities, microbial populations, and protein catabolites as affected by fructan supplementation of dog diets.

    E. A. Flickinger;E. M. W. C. Schreijen;A. R. Patil;H. S. Hussein

  • Chemical components with health implications in wild and cultivated Mexican common bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

    Luis Diaz-Batalla;Jack M. Widholm;George C. Fahey;Eduardo Castano-Tostado

  • Fermentability of various fiber sources by human fecal bacteria in vitro.

    Evan C. Titgemeyer;Leslie D. Bourquin;George C. Fahey;Keith A. Garleb

  • Chemical and nutritional characteristics of United States soybeans and soybean meals.

    Christine M. Grieshop;Charles T. Kadzere;Gina M. Clapper;Elizabeth A. Flickinger

  • Starch and Fiber Fractions in Selected Food and Feed Ingredients Affect Their Small Intestinal Digestibility and Fermentability and Their Large Bowel Fermentability In Vitro in a Canine Model

    Geoff E. Bednar;Avinash R. Patil;Sean M. Murray;Christine M. Grieshop

  • Selected Fructooligosaccharide (1-Kestose, Nystose, and 1F-β-Fructofuranosylnystose) Composition of Foods and Feeds

    Joy M. Campbell;Laura L. Bauer;George C. Fahey;A. J. C. L. Hogarth

  • Dietary Fiber Decreases the Metabolizable Energy Content and Nutrient Digestibility of Mixed Diets Fed to Humans

    David J. Baer;William V. Rumpler;Carolyn W. Miles;George C. Fahey

  • Nutritional Implications of Phenolic Monomers and Lignin: a Review

    H. G. Jung;G. C. Fahey

  • In vitro fermentation of cellulose, beet pulp, citrus pulp, and citrus pectin using fecal inoculum from cats, dogs, horses, humans, and pigs and ruminal fluid from cattle

    G D Sunvold;H S Hussein;G C Fahey;N R Merchen

  • Evaluation of wet and dry distillers grains and wet and dry corn gluten feeds for ruminants

    J. L. Firkins;L. L. Berger;G. C. Fahey

  • In vitro fermentation profiles, gas production rates, and microbiota modulation as affected by certain fructans, galactooligosaccharides, and polydextrose.

    David C. Hernot;Thomas W. Boileau;Laura L. Bauer;Ingmar S. Middelbos

  • Fructooligosaccharides and Lactobacillus acidophilus Modify Gut Microbial Populations, Total Tract Nutrient Digestibilities and Fecal Protein Catabolite Concentrations in Healthy Adult Dogs

    Kelly S Swanson;Christine M. Grieshop;Elizabeth A. Flickinger;Laura L. Bauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Neal R Merchen
Neal R Merchen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Larry L. Berger
Larry L. Berger University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kelly S. Swanson
Kelly S. Swanson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Laura L. Bauer
Laura L. Bauer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Christine M. Grieshop
Christine M. Grieshop University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Carl M Parsons
Carl M Parsons University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Evan C. Titgemeyer
Evan C. Titgemeyer Kansas State University
Michael R. Murphy
Michael R. Murphy University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Monty S. Kerley
Monty S. Kerley University of Missouri
Ryan N. Dilger
Ryan N. Dilger University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Animal Science and Veterinary studies, exploring related fields can broaden career prospects. Online colleges for addiction counseling, for example, offer a unique pathway for professionals who want to combine animal care with behavioral health support for individuals affected by substance abuse. This interdisciplinary approach can open doors to therapeutic roles involving animals.

Additionally, programs like the best online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) provide skills in counseling that complement animal welfare careers, particularly in therapeutic settings involving animal-assisted therapy. These degrees can enhance your ability to work with people and animals in clinical environments.

For those aiming to advance their credentials further, counseling phd programs available online provide opportunities to specialize in vet-related psychology or behavioral sciences, which can elevate your career to academic or research positions within the animal science field.

Finally, if you’re curious about career options, understanding what jobs work with animals that pay well is vital for setting realistic goals. From veterinary technicians to wildlife specialists, knowing the salary potential helps guide educational choices and career planning.

Best Scientists Citing George C. Fahey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles