World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
87
Citations
26248
World Ranking
2842
National Ranking
1460

Bruce R. Hamaker publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce R. Hamaker sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 448 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bruce R. Hamaker D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce R. Hamaker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce R. Hamaker is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on areas related to nutrition, food science, and biological sciences. The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of food composition, gut microbiota, microbial metabolites, and dietary impacts on metabolism.

The primary fields of study where Bruce R. Hamaker has made contributions include:

  • Nursing
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Medicine

Within these broader fields, their work has special emphasis on subfields such as:

  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Food Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Science

The main topics addressed in their research cover:

  • Food composition and properties
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Proteins in Food Systems
  • Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Polysaccharides Composition and Applications

Bruce R. Hamaker has published numerous papers in various scientific journals. Among the recent papers are:

  • "Quantitative approach to study secondary structure of proteins by FT-IR spectroscopy, using a model wheat gluten system," 2020, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
  • "Gut microbiota modulation with long-chain corn bran arabinoxylan in adults with overweight and obesity is linked to an individualized temporal increase in fecal propionate," 2020, Microbiome
  • "New View on Dietary Fiber Selection for Predictable Shifts in Gut Microbiota," 2020, mBio
  • "An open label, non-randomized study assessing a prebiotic fiber intervention in a small cohort of Parkinson's disease participants," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Dietary Fiber Hierarchical Specificity: the Missing Link for Predictable and Strong Shifts in Gut Bacterial Communities," 2021, mBio

They frequently publish in several specific scientific venues, with the most common being:

  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • Carbohydrate Polymers
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
  • Food Hydrocolloids
  • Food & Function

Throughout their career, Bruce R. Hamaker has collaborated with multiple researchers, including:

  • Thaisa M. Cantu-Jungles
  • Osvaldo H. Campanella
  • Ali Keshavarzian
  • Oguz Kaan Ozturk
  • Mário G. Ferruzzi

Best Publications

  • Factors affecting sorghum protein digestibility

    K.G Duodu;J.R.N Taylor;P.S Belton;B.R Hamaker

  • Banana starch: production, physicochemical properties, and digestibility—a review

    Pingyi Zhang;Roy L. Whistler;James N. BeMiller;Bruce R. Hamaker

  • Fiber-utilizing capacity varies in Prevotella- versus Bacteroides-dominated gut microbiota.

    Tingting Chen;Wenmin Long;Chenhong Zhang;Shuang Liu

  • A Perspective on the Complexity of Dietary Fiber Structures and Their Potential Effect on the Gut Microbiota

    Bruce R. Hamaker;Yunus E. Tuncil

  • Slow digestion property of native cereal starches.

    Genyi Zhang;Zihua Ao;Bruce R. Hamaker

  • Prebiotics: why definitions matter.

    Robert W. Hutkins;Janina A. Krumbeck;Laure B. Bindels;Patrice D. Cani

  • Slowly digestible starch: concept, mechanism, and proposed extended glycemic index.

    Genyi Zhang;Bruce R Hamaker

  • Dietary Modulation of Gut Microbiota Contributes to Alleviation of Both Genetic and Simple Obesity in Children

    Chenhong Zhang;Aihua Yin;Hongde Li;Ruirui Wang

  • Nature and consequences of non-covalent interactions between flavonoids and macronutrients in foods

    Nicolas Bordenave;Bruce R. Hamaker;Mario G. Ferruzzi

  • Amylopectin Fine Structure and Rice Starch Paste Breakdown

    Xian-Zhong Han;Bruce R. Hamaker

  • Starch with a Slow Digestion Property Produced by Altering Its Chain Length, Branch Density, and Crystalline Structure

    Zihua Ao;Senay Simsek;Genyi Zhang;Mahesh Venkatachalam

  • Pulse Consumption, Satiety, and Weight Management

    Megan A. McCrory;Bruce R. Hamaker;Jennifer C. Lovejoy;Petra E. Eichelsdoerfer

  • Efficient procedure for extracting maize and sorghum kernel proteins reveals higher prolamin contents than the conventional method.

    Hamaker Br;Mohamed Aa;Habben Je;Huang Cp

  • Effect of disulfide bond-containing protein on rice starch gelatinization and pasting

    B.R. Hamaker;V.K. Griffin

  • Improving the in vitro protein digestibility of sorghum with reducing agents.

    B. R. Hamaker;A. W. Kirleis;L. G. Butler;J. D. Axtell

  • Structural basis for the slow digestion property of native cereal starches.

    Genyi Zhang;Mahesh Venkatachalam;Bruce R Hamaker

  • A highly digestible sorghum mutant cultivar exhibits a unique folded structure of endosperm protein bodies

    Maria P. Oria;Bruce R. Hamaker;John D. Axtell;Chia-Ping Huang

  • Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa W.) and amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus L.) provide dietary fibres high in pectic substances and xyloglucans

    Lisa M. Lamothe;Sathaporn Srichuwong;Bradley L. Reuhs;Bruce R. Hamaker

  • Maize Opaque Endosperm Mutations Create Extensive Changes in Patterns of Gene Expression

    Brenda G. Hunter;Mary K. Beatty;George W. Singletary;Bruce R. Hamaker

  • Influence of Dietary Fiber on Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colon Cancer: Importance of Fermentation Pattern

    Devin J. Rose;Mark T. DeMeo;Ali Keshavarzian;Bruce R. Hamaker

Frequent Co-Authors

Buford L. Nichols
Buford L. Nichols Baylor College of Medicine
Mario G. Ferruzzi
Mario G. Ferruzzi North Carolina State University
Ali Keshavarzian
Ali Keshavarzian Rush University Medical Center
David R. Rose
David R. Rose University of Waterloo
John D. Axtell
John D. Axtell Purdue University West Lafayette
Gebisa Ejeta
Gebisa Ejeta Purdue University West Lafayette
Eric C. Martens
Eric C. Martens University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brian A. Larkins
Brian A. Larkins University of Arizona
Stefan J. Green
Stefan J. Green University of Illinois at Chicago
James N. BeMiller
James N. BeMiller Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up a variety of online degree and career options. Many students begin their journeys with medical assistant courses online, which provide a solid foundation in patient care, laboratory work, and healthcare communication.

For those who want to advance, seamless transitions are available—such as medical assistant to lpn programs. These online pathways help students quickly upskill and prepare for more specialized roles in nursing.

If your interest leans toward the scientific side, pursuing a biology degree online delivers both flexibility and rigorous coursework. Graduates gain strong analytical and research skills, which are in demand across healthcare, biotech, and academia.

Further career growth is possible through nursing-focused education, such as registered nurse online programs. These degrees open doors to high-demand roles across clinics and hospitals, meeting the ongoing demand for medical professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce R. Hamaker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles