World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 60 9949 8999 234 224 148 9444

Sushil Dhital publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sushil Dhital between 2009 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sushil Dhital published across 18 years, from 2009 to 2026, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2025. 25 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2025. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 3 publications
2009 2026

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sushil Dhital: publications per year, 2009 to 2026
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 3
2011 11
2012 4
2013 5
2014 7
2015 8
2016 6
2017 15
2018 11
2019 15
2020 8
2021 17
2022 19
2023 20
2024 21
2025 22
2026 3
Total 196
Download as CSV

Sushil Dhital publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sushil Dhital sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 148 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 148
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Sushil Dhital D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sushil Dhital sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882 60
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sushil Dhital is a researcher affiliated with Monash University in Australia, with a focus on Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Nursing. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics within food science, nutrition, and plant science, emphasizing the composition, properties, and applications of food components.

Their body of work touches on key areas such as:

  • Food composition and properties
  • Microbial metabolites in food biotechnology
  • Proteins in food systems
  • Polysaccharides composition and applications
  • Phytase and its applications
  • Probiotics and fermented foods
  • Botanical research and chemistry

Dhital has frequently published in prominent scientific journals. Notable venues with multiple publications include:

  • Food Hydrocolloids
  • Food Chemistry
  • Carbohydrate Polymers
  • Foods
  • Trends in Food Science & Technology

Some of Dhital's recent papers are:

  • Wood hemicelluloses exert distinct biomechanical contributions to cellulose fibrillar networks, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Dietary fiber-gluten protein interaction in wheat flour dough: Analysis, consequences and proposed mechanisms, 2020, Food Hydrocolloids
  • Lupin proteins: Structure, isolation and application, 2021, Trends in Food Science & Technology
  • Biomolecule-based pickering food emulsions: Intrinsic components of food matrix, recent trends and prospects, 2020, Food Hydrocolloids
  • High-amylose wheat starch: Structural basis for water absorption and pasting properties, 2020, Carbohydrate Polymers

Dhital collaborates frequently with a group of co-authors who have contributed extensively to their research. Prominent co-authors include:

  • Lavaraj Devkota
  • Bin Zhang
  • Gaurav Kumar
  • Xiong Fu
  • Haiteng Li

Their research is situated within subfields including Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Molecular Biology. This multidisciplinary approach supports investigation into the chemical, biological, and functional characteristics of food components and plant-based materials as well as their implications for nutrition and health.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of starch digestion by α-amylase-Structural basis for kinetic properties.

    Sushil Dhital;Frederick J. Warren;Peter J. Butterworth;Peter R. Ellis

  • Relationship between granule size and in vitro digestibility of maize and potato starches

    Sushil Dhital;Ashok K. Shrestha;Michael J. Gidley

  • Inhibition of α-amylase activity by cellulose: Kinetic analysis and nutritional implications

    Sushil Dhital;Michael J. Gidley;Frederick J. Warren

  • Intactness of cell wall structure controls the in vitro digestion of starch in legumes

    Sushil Dhital;Rewati R. Bhattarai;John Gorham;Michael J. Gidley

  • High-Amylose Starches to Bridge the “Fiber Gap”: Development, Structure, and Nutritional Functionality

    Haiteng Li;Michael J. Gidley;Sushil Dhital

  • Milling of rice grains: effects of starch/flour structures on gelatinization and pasting properties

    Jovin Hasjim;Enpeng Li;Sushil Dhital

  • Wood hemicelluloses exert distinct biomechanical contributions to cellulose fibrillar networks.

    Jennie Berglund;Deirdre Mikkelsen;Bernadine M. Flanagan;Sushil Dhital;Sushil Dhital

  • Dietary fiber-gluten protein interaction in wheat flour dough: analysis, consequences and proposed mechanisms

    Yun Zhou;Sushil Dhital;Chenyang Zhao;Fayin Ye

  • Synergistic and antagonistic effects of α-Amylase and amyloglucosidase on starch digestion.

    Bin Zhang;Sushil Dhital;Michael J. Gidley

  • Effects of grain milling on starch structures and flour/starch properties

    Enpeng Li;Sushil Dhital;Jovin Hasjim

  • Physicochemical and structural properties of maize and potato starches as a function of granule size.

    Sushil Dhital;Ashok K. Shrestha;Jovin Hasjim;Michael J. Gidley

  • The interplay of α-amylase and amyloglucosidase activities on the digestion of starch in in vitro enzymic systems.

    Frederick J. Warren;Bin Zhang;Gina Waltzer;Michael J. Gidley

  • Multilevel Structure of Wheat Starch and Its Relationship to Noodle Eating Qualities.

    Ming Li;Sushil Dhital;Yimin Wei

  • Freeze-Drying Changes the Structure and Digestibility of B-Polymorphic Starches

    Bin Zhang;Kai Wang;Jovin Hasjim;Enpeng Li

  • Densely packed matrices as rate determining features in starch hydrolysis

    Bin Zhang;Sushil Dhital;Michael J. Gidley

  • Effect of cryo-milling on starches: Functionality and digestibility

    Sushil Dhital;Ashok K. Shrestha;Michael J. Gidley

  • Digestion of isolated legume cells in a stomach-duodenum model: three mechanisms limit starch and protein hydrolysis.

    Rewati R. Bhattarai;Sushil Dhital;Peng Wu;Peng Wu;Xiao Dong Chen;Xiao Dong Chen

  • The adsorption of α-amylase on barley proteins affects the in vitro digestion of starch in barley flour.

    Wenwen Yu;Wei Zou;Sushil Dhital;Peng Wu

  • Molecular, mesoscopic and microscopic structure evolution during amylase digestion of maize starch granules.

    Ashok K. Shrestha;Jaroslav Blazek;Bernadine M. Flanagan;Sushil Dhital

  • Location and interactions of starches in planta: Effects on food and nutritional functionality

    Sushil Dhital;Sushil Dhital;Charles Brennan;Michael J. Gidley

  • Rice starch granule amylolysis – Differentiating effects of particle size, morphology, thermal properties and crystalline polymorph

    Sushil Dhital;Vito M. Butardo;Stephen A. Jobling;Michael J. Gidley

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Gidley
Michael J. Gidley University of Queensland
Robert G. Gilbert
Robert G. Gilbert University of Queensland
Qiang Huang
Qiang Huang South China University of Technology
Xiao Dong Chen
Xiao Dong Chen Soochow University
Xiong Fu
Xiong Fu South China University of Technology
Jason R. Stokes
Jason R. Stokes University of Queensland
Elliot P. Gilbert
Elliot P. Gilbert Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
Gunnar Henriksson
Gunnar Henriksson Royal Institute of Technology
Ian D. Godwin
Ian D. Godwin University of Queensland
Matthew K. Morell
Matthew K. Morell Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Chemistry in the USA, exploring related fields like forensic science can open diverse career opportunities. Many colleges now offer online colleges for forensic science degrees, providing flexible options to gain specialized knowledge that complements a chemistry background. These programs prepare graduates for roles that blend chemical expertise with criminal investigations.

One promising career pathway is becoming an autopsy technician, where chemistry skills are essential in analyzing substances and aiding forensic examinations. This role requires technical training and offers a stable salary outlook, making it an attractive option in criminal justice and medical fields.

For those interested in the psychological aspects of crime, pursuing an online forensic psychology masters can be a valuable step. This degree combines science and psychology, enhancing understanding of criminal behavior and investigative processes.

Overall, numerous forensic career paths are available to chemistry graduates, ranging from laboratory analysis to law enforcement support. Exploring these options can help students find a fulfilling career aligned with their skills and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Sushil Dhital

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles