World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5165 4790 541 511 165 12382

Louise Johns publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Louise Johns between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Louise Johns published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2006. 13 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2006. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 9 publications
1998 2025

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Louise Johns: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 5
2003 6
2004 12
2005 9
2006 22
2007 14
2008 7
2009 3
2010 11
2011 8
2012 5
2013 10
2014 8
2015 4
2016 6
2017 5
2018 1
2019 2
2020 8
2021 9
2022 9
2023 8
2024 4
2025 9
Total 191
Download as CSV

Louise Johns publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise Johns sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 165 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 165
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Louise Johns D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise Johns sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Louise Johns is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research centers on psychological and psychiatric topics, with a particular focus on schizophrenia and related mental health issues.

The main fields of study for Louise Johns cover psychology and medicine, with subfields emphasizing psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, and philosophy.

Their primary research topics include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Family caregiving in mental illness
  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Family support in illness
  • Anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes
  • Mental health and psychiatry
  • Maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum

Louise Johns has published multiple papers, several of which are recent and related to psychosis and psychological interventions. Notable papers include:

  • Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis: Current status, lingering questions and future directions, 2023, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • A Scoping Review of Interventions Designed to Support Parents With Mental Illness That Would Be Appropriate for Parents With Psychosis, 2022, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Group acceptance and commitment therapy for patients and caregivers in psychosis services: Feasibility of training and a preliminary randomized controlled evaluation, 2020, British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • A targeted psychological treatment for sleep problems in young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis in England (SleepWell): a parallel group, single-blind, randomised controlled feasibility trial, 2023, The Lancet Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors in Louise Johns's work are:

  • Jessica Radley
  • Daniel Freeman
  • Jane Barlow
  • Daniel Maughan
  • Felicity Waite

Their publications are often found in these venues:

  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • THE CONTINUITY OF PSYCHOTIC EXPERIENCES IN THE GENERAL POPULATION

    Louise C Johns;Jim van Os

  • Elevated Striatal Dopamine Function Linked to Prodromal Signs of Schizophrenia

    Oliver D Howes;Andrew J Montgomery;Marie-Claude Asselin;Robin M Murray

  • Prevalence and correlates of self-reported psychotic symptoms in the British population

    Louise C. Johns;Mary Cannon;Nicola Singleton;Robin M. Murray

  • Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial

    Sue M Moss;Howard Cuckle;Andy Evans;Louise Johns

  • Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia and Nonschizophrenia Populations: A Review and Integrated Model of Cognitive Mechanisms

    Flavie Waters;Paul Allen;Andre Aleman;Charles Fernyhough

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations in persons with and without a need for care

    Louise C. Johns;Kristiina Kompus;Melissa Connell;Clara Humpston

  • Occurrence of hallucinatory experiences in a community sample and ethnic variations.

    Louise C. Johns;James Y. Nazroo;Paul Bebbington;Elizabeth Kuipers

  • The Characteristic Features of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Clinical and Nonclinical Groups: State-of-the-Art Overview and Future Directions

    Frank Laroi;Iris E. Sommer;Jan Dirk Blom;Charles Fernyhough

  • Verbal self-monitoring and auditory verbal hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia.

    L. C. Johns;S. Rossell;C. Frith;F. Ahmad

  • Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis.

    M R Broome;L C Johns;I Valli;J B Woolley

  • What causes the onset of psychosis

    Matthew R. Broome;James B. Woolley;Paul Tabraham;Louise C. Johns

  • Superior temporal lobe dysfunction and frontotemporal dysconnectivity in subjects at risk of psychosis and in first-episode psychosis

    Nicolas Crossley;Andrea Mechelli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Matthew Broome

  • Psychological Therapies for Auditory Hallucinations (Voices): Current Status and Key Directions for Future Research

    Neil Thomas;Mark Hayward;Mark Hayward;Emmanuelle Peters;Emmanuelle Peters;Mark van der Gaag

  • Alterations in White Matter Evident Before the Onset of Psychosis

    Francesco Carletti;James B. Woolley;Sagnik Bhattacharyya;Rocio Perez-Iglesias

  • Outreach and support in south London (OASIS): implementation of a clinical service for prodromal psychosis and the at risk mental state.

    Matthew R. Broome;James B. Woolley;Louise C. Johns;Lucia R. Valmaggia

  • Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): final results of a randomised, controlled trial

    Stephen W Duffy;Daniel Vulkan;Howard Cuckle;Dharmishta Parmar

  • Misattribution of speech and impaired connectivity in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations

    Andrea Mechelli;Paul Allen;Edson Amaro;Cynthia H.Y. Fu

  • Misattribution of external speech in patients with hallucinations and delusions.

    Paul P Allen;Louise C Johns;Cynthia H.Y Fu;Matthew R Broome

  • Neural correlates of executive function and working memory in the ‘ at-risk mental state’

    Matthew R. Broome;Pall Matthiasson;Paolo Fusar-Poli;James B. Woolley

  • Neural correlates of the misattribution of speech in schizophrenia.

    Paul Allen;Edson Amaro;Cynthia H. Y. Fu;Steven C. R. Williams

  • Reduced Mismatch Negativity Predates the Onset of Psychosis

    Madiha Shaikh;Lucia Valmaggia;Matthew R. Broome;Anirban Dutt

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew R. Broome
Matthew R. Broome University of Birmingham
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Lucia Valmaggia
Lucia Valmaggia King's College London
Elvira Bramon
Elvira Bramon University College London
Emmanuelle Peters
Emmanuelle Peters King's College London
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli King's College London
Paul Allen
Paul Allen Royal Holloway University of London
Philippa Garety
Philippa Garety King's College London
Elizabeth Kuipers
Elizabeth Kuipers King's College London
Cynthia H.Y. Fu
Cynthia H.Y. Fu University of East London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degree options and professional pathways. Careers such as school counseling are in high demand and offer meaningful opportunities to work directly with students in educational settings. If you’re interested in guiding young people academically and emotionally, consider exploring the specific licensure requirements in your state.

Each state has unique criteria for becoming a school counselor. For instance, you can learn about the steps in Michigan with how to become a school counselor in Michigan. If you’re planning to work in the Midwest, check out how to become a school counselor in Minnesota. Aspiring counselors in the South may find it helpful to review how to become a school counselor in Mississippi. Those looking toward Missouri can reference how to become a school counselor in Missouri for more information.

Online psychology degrees often offer flexibility, making it easier to meet educational prerequisites for these roles. Research state-specific requirements early to ensure you select the right academic and professional path for your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Louise Johns

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles