World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 124 3228 3013 322 308 527 56810

Paolo Fusar-Poli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paolo Fusar-Poli between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paolo Fusar-Poli published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 39.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 89 publications in 2025. 164 of the 821 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 89. Peak 89 publications in 2025. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 10 publications 2007: 31 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 62 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 41 publications 2020: 54 publications 2021: 72 publications 2022: 59 publications 2023: 69 publications 2024: 75 publications 2025: 89 publications
2005 2025

821 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paolo Fusar-Poli: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 10
2007 31
2008 27
2009 31
2010 18
2011 22
2012 62
2013 34
2014 25
2015 26
2016 27
2017 20
2018 28
2019 41
2020 54
2021 72
2022 59
2023 69
2024 75
2025 89
Total 821
Download as CSV

Paolo Fusar-Poli publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Fusar-Poli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 527 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 527
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Paolo Fusar-Poli D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Fusar-Poli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 124–125 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256 124
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paolo Fusar-Poli is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and works primarily in the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their research activity focuses extensively on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. These subfields cover a wide scope of mental health and cognitive studies.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Paolo Fusar-Poli has been published frequently in several academic venues, notably:

  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • UNC Libraries

The scientist's work includes research articles with significant citation impact. Selected recent papers encompass:

  • Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies (2021, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on child and adolescent mental health: systematic review (2021, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry)
  • Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022, BMJ)
  • Impact of coronavirus syndromes on physical and mental health of health care workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, Journal of Affective Disorders)

The scientist collaborates regularly with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Philip McGuire
  • Marco Solmi
  • Dominic Oliver
  • Joaquim Raduà
  • Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo

Best Publications

  • Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies.

    Marco Solmi;Marco Solmi;Joaquim Radua;Joaquim Radua;Miriam Olivola;Enrico Croce

  • The Psychosis High-Risk State: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Stefan Borgwardt;Andreas Bechdolf;Jean Addington

  • Predicting Psychosis: Meta-analysis of Transition Outcomes in Individuals at High Clinical Risk

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Ilaria Bonoldi;Alison R. Yung;Stefan Borgwardt

  • Functional atlas of emotional faces processing: a voxel-based meta-analysis of 105 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Anna Placentino;Francesco Carletti;Paola Landi

  • The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on child and adolescent mental health: systematic review.

    Urvashi Panchal;Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo;Macarena Franco;Carmen Moreno

  • Cognitive Functioning in Prodromal Psychosis: A Meta-analysis

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Giacomo Deste;Renata Smieskova;Stefano Barlati

  • Opposite effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology.

    Sagnik Bhattacharyya;Paul D Morrison;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Rocio Martin-Santos

  • Treatments of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: Meta-Analysis of 168 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Evangelos Papanastasiou;Daniel Stahl;Matteo Rocchetti

  • Comorbid Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in 509 Individuals With an At-Risk Mental State: Impact on Psychopathology and Transition to Psychosis

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Barnaby Nelson;Lucia Valmaggia;Alison R. Yung

  • Impact of coronavirus syndromes on physical and mental health of health care workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo;Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo;Julio Vaquerizo-Serrano;Ana Catalan;Celso Arango

  • Cannabis and anxiety: a critical review of the evidence

    José Alexandre Crippa;Antonio Waldo Zuardi;Rocio Martín-Santos;Sagnik Bhattacharyya

  • Neural basis of anxiolytic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) in generalized social anxiety disorder: a preliminary report:

    José Alexandre S Crippa;Guilherme Nogueira Derenusson;Thiago Borduqui Ferrari;Lauro Wichert-Ana

  • Progressive brain changes in schizophrenia related to antipsychotic treatment? A meta-analysis of longitudinal MRI studies

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;R Smieskova;Matthew Kempton;B C Ho

  • What Causes Psychosis? An Umbrella Review of Risk and Protective Factors

    Joaquim Radua;Joaquim Radua;Valentina Ramella-Cravaro;Valentina Ramella-Cravaro;John P.A. Ioannidis;Abraham Reichenberg

  • Altering the course of schizophrenia: progress and perspectives

    Mark J. Millan;Annie Andrieux;George Bartzokis;Kristin Cadenhead

  • Distinct effects of {delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on neural activation during emotional processing.

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;José Alexandre de Souza Crippa;Sagnik Bhattacharyya;Stefan J. Borgwardt

  • Improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis: an overview

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Patrick D. McGorry;John M. Kane

  • Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention.

    John P.A. Ioannidis;Marcus R. Munafò;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Brian A. Nosek

  • Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Joaquim Radua

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Stefan Borgwardt
Stefan Borgwardt University of Lübeck
Paul Allen
Paul Allen Royal Holloway University of London
Lucia Valmaggia
Lucia Valmaggia King's College London
Joaquim Radua
Joaquim Radua University of Barcelona
Marco Solmi
Marco Solmi University of Ottawa
Matthew R. Broome
Matthew R. Broome University of Birmingham
Oliver D. Howes
Oliver D. Howes King's College London
Anita Riecher-Rössler
Anita Riecher-Rössler University of Basel
Rocío Martín-Santos
Rocío Martín-Santos University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their healthcare knowledge beyond Medicine, a range of online nursing degrees and career pathways are available. These programs offer flexibility and affordability—key factors for many working professionals and recent graduates.

Those looking for cost-effective options may want to explore the cheapest online nursing programs, which can provide a solid foundation in nursing without high tuition costs. Registered Nurses (RNs) aiming to further their education and career potential might consider the rn to bsn online cost to understand affordable pathways for earning a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

For advanced nursing roles or careers in research, leadership, and education, pursuing phd nursing education online offers convenient and flexible learning options. Additionally, non-nursing graduates interested in the nursing field can consider online msn programs for non nurses, which provide a direct entry route to a career in nursing without requiring a prior nursing degree.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Fusar-Poli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles