World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
19406
World Ranking
2459
National Ranking
268

Lucia Valmaggia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia Valmaggia sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 275 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lucia Valmaggia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia Valmaggia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lucia Valmaggia is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily intersects the fields of psychology and medicine, with a specialized focus on psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, general health professions, and social psychology.

The scientist's scholarly output includes significant contributions to topics such as schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health research topics, mental health and psychiatry, digital mental health interventions, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, mental health treatment and access, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Valmaggia's recent papers illustrate a focus on mental health and innovative clinical tools:

  • The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health, 2024, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Virtual reality as a clinical tool in mental health research and practice, 2020, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
  • Virtual reality relaxation for the general population: a systematic review, 2021, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • Development of Proteomic Prediction Models for Transition to Psychotic Disorder in the Clinical High-Risk State and Psychotic Experiences in Adolescence, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Worldwide implementation of clinical services for the prevention of psychosis: The IEPA early intervention in mental health survey, 2020, Early Intervention in Psychiatry

The venues where Valmaggia has most frequently published include:

  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist collaborates regularly with several notable co-authors, including:

  • Philip McGuire
  • Matthew J. Kempton
  • Mark van der Gaag
  • Lieuwe de Haan
  • Stephan Ruhrmann

Best Publications

  • The Psychosis High-Risk State: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Stefan Borgwardt;Andreas Bechdolf;Jean Addington

  • Predicting Psychosis: Meta-analysis of Transition Outcomes in Individuals at High Clinical Risk

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Ilaria Bonoldi;Alison R. Yung;Stefan Borgwardt

  • Elevated Striatal Dopamine Function Linked to Prodromal Signs of Schizophrenia

    Oliver D Howes;Andrew J Montgomery;Marie-Claude Asselin;Robin M Murray

  • Comorbid Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in 509 Individuals With an At-Risk Mental State: Impact on Psychopathology and Transition to Psychosis

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Barnaby Nelson;Lucia Valmaggia;Alison R. Yung

  • The five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale - II: A ten-fold cross-validation of a revised model

    Mark van der Gaag;Tonko Hoffman;Mila Remijsen;Ron Hijman

  • Virtual reality in the psychological treatment for mental health problems: An systematic review of recent evidence.

    Lucia R. Valmaggia;Leila Latif;Matthew J. Kempton;Maria Rus-Calafell

  • Dopamine synthesis capacity before onset of psychosis: a prospective [18F]-DOPA PET imaging study.

    Oliver D. Howes;Subrata K. Bose;Federico Turkheimer;Isabel Valli

  • The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health

    Unknown

  • Deconstructing vulnerability for psychosis: Meta-analysis of environmental risk factors for psychosis in subjects at ultra high-risk

    P. Fusar-Poli;M. Tantardini;S. De Simone;V. Ramella-Cravaro

  • Stress Sensitivity, Aberrant Salience, and Threat Anticipation in Early Psychosis: An Experience Sampling Study

    Ulrich Reininghaus;Ulrich Reininghaus;Matthew J. Kempton;Lucia Valmaggia;Tom K. J. Craig

  • The effects of individually tailored formulation-based cognitive behavioural therapy in auditory hallucinations and delusions: a meta-analysis.

    Mark van der Gaag;Lucia R. Valmaggia;Lucia R. Valmaggia;Filip Smit

  • Virtual reality in the assessment and treatment of psychosis: a systematic review of its utility, acceptability and effectiveness

    Mar Rus-Calafell;P. Garety;E. Sason;T. J. K. Craig

  • Progressive increase in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity as patients develop psychosis: a PET study.

    O Howes;S Bose;F Turkheimer;I Valli

  • Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Contemporary Challenges for Integrated, Large-scale Investigations

    Jim van Os;Jim van Os;Bart P. Rutten;Inez Myin-Germeys;Philippe Delespaul

  • Virtual reality as a clinical tool in mental health research and practice .

    Imogen H Bell;Jennifer Nicholas;Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Andrew Thompson

  • Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis.

    M R Broome;L C Johns;I Valli;J B Woolley

  • Superior temporal lobe dysfunction and frontotemporal dysconnectivity in subjects at risk of psychosis and in first-episode psychosis

    Nicolas Crossley;Andrea Mechelli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Matthew Broome

  • Alterations in White Matter Evident Before the Onset of Psychosis

    Francesco Carletti;James B. Woolley;Sagnik Bhattacharyya;Rocio Perez-Iglesias

  • Outreach and support in South London (OASIS), 2001–2011: Ten years of early diagnosis and treatment for young individuals at high clinical risk for psychosis

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Majella Byrne;Majella Byrne;Steven Badger;Steven Badger;Lucia Valmaggia;Lucia Valmaggia

  • Outreach and support in south London (OASIS): implementation of a clinical service for prodromal psychosis and the at risk mental state.

    Matthew R. Broome;James B. Woolley;Louise C. Johns;Lucia R. Valmaggia

  • Disorganization/Cognitive and Negative Symptom Dimensions in the At-Risk Mental State Predict Subsequent Transition to Psychosis

    Arsime Demjaha;Lucia Valmaggia;Daniel Stahl;Majella Byrne

  • The five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale I: confirmatory factor analysis fails to confirm 25 published five-factor solutions.

    Mark van der Gaag;Anke Cuijpers;Tonko Hoffman;Mila Remijsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli King's College London
Matthew R. Broome
Matthew R. Broome University of Birmingham
Louise Johns
Louise Johns University of Oxford
Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Philippa Garety
Philippa Garety King's College London
Elvira Bramon
Elvira Bramon University College London
Mark van der Gaag
Mark van der Gaag Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Oliver D. Howes
Oliver D. Howes King's College London
Robin M. Murray
Robin M. Murray King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degree programs and professional career pathways. Many students who earn a psychology degree consider further specialization, such as becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP), a field that blends communication science with clinical work.

SLP careers require navigating specific state certification processes. For example, students interested in slp requirements in Georgia should be aware of unique state licensure steps and supervised clinical experience obligations. Similarly, the Hawaii slp certification requirements outline particular background checks and continuing education standards.

Other states, like Idaho and Illinois, follow their own guidelines. Those exploring becoming a speech therapist in Idaho will find information on approved graduate programs and state exams, while aspiring professionals can review slp requirements in Illinois for insight into local rules and required credentials.

Understanding these state-by-state requirements helps psychology graduates decide on the most suitable career path, as well as the best online degree or certification program to fit their personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Lucia Valmaggia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles