World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 78 1591 1424 74 70 475 21774
Medicine 78 18062 16975 601 587 468 21683

Barnaby Nelson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Barnaby Nelson between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Barnaby Nelson published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2020. 58 of the 588 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2020. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 46 publications 2019: 42 publications 2020: 57 publications 2021: 54 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 56 publications 2026: 2 publications
1994 2026

588 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Barnaby Nelson: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 5
2007 6
2008 12
2009 15
2010 24
2011 19
2012 32
2013 29
2014 24
2015 18
2016 23
2017 27
2018 46
2019 42
2020 57
2021 54
2022 34
2023 27
2024 31
2025 56
2026 2
Total 588
Download as CSV

Barnaby Nelson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barnaby Nelson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 471–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 475 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25 475
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Barnaby Nelson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barnaby Nelson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 78
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Barnaby Nelson is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research contributions span broadly in the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a particular focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Clinical Psychology.

The research topics addressed by Nelson primarily include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Nelson has contributed to several recent papers that focus on psychosis and mental health, including:

  • "The potential impact of COVID-19 on psychosis: A rapid review of contemporary epidemic and pandemic research," published in 2020 in Schizophrenia Research
  • "Transdiagnostic clinical staging in youth mental health: a first international consensus statement," published in 2020 in World Psychiatry
  • "The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics," published in 2022 in World Psychiatry
  • "Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis," published in 2021 in JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Preventive interventions for individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis: An updated and extended meta-analysis," published in 2021 in Clinical Psychology Review

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Nelson include:

  • Patrick D. McGorry
  • G. Paul Amminger
  • Alison R. Yung
  • Lieuwe de Haan
  • Stephen J. Wood

Nelson's publications appear often in several key venues known for mental health and psychiatric research, including:

  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia
  • JAMA Psychiatry

In addition to journal articles, Nelson has contributed to book publications, notably a work published by Frontiers Media titled "Shared Decision Making in Mental Health: International Perspectives on Implementation" in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Comorbid Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in 509 Individuals With an At-Risk Mental State: Impact on Psychopathology and Transition to Psychosis

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Barnaby Nelson;Lucia Valmaggia;Alison R. Yung

  • Declining Transition Rate in Ultra High Risk (Prodromal) Services: Dilution or Reduction of Risk?

    Alison R Yung;Hok Pan Yuen;Gregor Berger;Shona Francey

  • Beyond the “at risk mental state” concept: transitioning to transdiagnostic psychiatry

    Patrick D. McGorry;Jessica A. Hartmann;Rachael Spooner;Barnaby Nelson

  • VALIDATION OF "PRODROMAL" CRITERIA TO DETECT INDIVIDUALS AT ULTRA HIGH RISK OF PSYCHOSIS: 2 YEAR FOLLOW UP

    Alison Yung;B Nelson;C Stanford;M Simmons

  • Long-term follow-up of a group at ultra high risk ("prodromal") for psychosis: the PACE 400 study

    Barnaby Nelson;Hok Pan Yuen;Stephen J Wood;Ashleigh Lin

  • Heterogeneity of Psychosis Risk Within Individuals at Clinical High Risk: A Meta-analytical Stratification

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Marco Cappucciati;Marco Cappucciati;Stefan Borgwardt;Scott W. Woods

  • Psychotic-Like Experiences in a Community Sample of Adolescents: Implications for the Continuum Model of Psychosis and Prediction of Schizophrenia

    Alison R. Yung;Barnaby Nelson;Kathryn Baker;Joe A. Buckby

  • Intervention in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a review and future directions.

    Patrick D. McGorry;Barnaby Nelson;G. Paul Amminger;Andreas Bechdolf

  • Testing the Ultra High Risk (prodromal) criteria for the prediction of psychosis in a clinical sample of young people.

    Alison R. Yung;Carrie Stanford;Elizabeth Cosgrave;Eoin Killackey

  • Moving From Static to Dynamic Models of the Onset of Mental Disorder: A Review

    Barnaby Nelson;Patrick D. McGorry;Marieke Wichers;Johanna T. W. Wigman

  • BASIC SELF-DISTURBANCE PREDICTS PSYCHOSIS ONSET IN THE ULTRA HIGH RISK FOR PSYCHOSIS("PRODROMAL") POPULATION

    Barnaby Nelson;A. Thompson;A.R. Yung

  • Clinical staging: a heuristic and practical strategy for new research and better health and social outcomes for psychotic and related mood disorders.

    Patrick D McGorry;Barnaby Nelson;Sherilyn Goldstone;Alison R Yung

  • Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Contemporary Challenges for Integrated, Large-scale Investigations

    Jim van Os;Jim van Os;Bart P. Rutten;Inez Myin-Germeys;Philippe Delespaul

  • Psychotic-like experiences and correlation with distress and depressive symptoms in a community sample of adolescents and young adults.

    Marco Armando;Barnaby Nelson;Alison R. Yung;Margaret Ross

  • Outcomes of Nontransitioned Cases in a Sample at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis

    Ashleigh Lin;Stephen J. Wood;Barnaby Nelson;Amanda Beavan

  • Effect of ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Young People at Ultrahigh Risk for Psychotic Disorders: The NEURAPRO Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Patrick D. McGorry;Barnaby Nelson;Connie Markulev;Hok Pan Yuen

  • The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom‐up review co‐written by experts by experience and academics

    Unknown

  • Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis

    A. Lin;A. Lin;S.J. Wood;S.J. Wood;B. Nelson;W.J. Brewer

  • Transdiagnostic clinical staging in youth mental health: a first international consensus statement

    Jai L. Shah;Jai L. Shah;Jan Scott;Patrick D. McGorry;Shane P.M. Cross

  • Relating Schizotypy and Personality to the Phenomenology of Creativity

    B Nelson;D Rawlings

  • BasicSelf-DisturbancePredictsPsychosisOnsetintheUltraHighRiskforPsychosis ''Prodromal'' Population

    Barnaby Nelson;Andrew Thompson;Alison R. Yung

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick D. McGorry
Patrick D. McGorry University of Melbourne
Alison R. Yung
Alison R. Yung Deakin University
Stephen J. Wood
Stephen J. Wood University of Melbourne
Ashleigh Lin
Ashleigh Lin Telethon Kids Institute
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis University of Melbourne
Merete Nordentoft
Merete Nordentoft University of Copenhagen
Anita Riecher-Rössler
Anita Riecher-Rössler University of Basel
Ian B. Hickie
Ian B. Hickie University of Sydney
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Lisa J. Phillips
Lisa J. Phillips University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees offers flexibility for students who need to balance education with work or family commitments. Many universities now provide accelerated online programs, allowing learners to finish their degrees faster and enter the workforce sooner.

For example, those interested in graduate-level education may consider accelerated online psychology master's degrees in Virginia, which can lead to advanced counseling, research, or specialist roles. In Texas, you can find a range of accelerated online psychology degrees in Texas for both undergraduate and graduate learners, opening doors to careers in human resources, mental health, and education.

If you want to study on the West Coast, fastest online psychology degree programs in Washington combine speed with academic quality. Meanwhile, Midwest students can benefit from the fastest online psychology degrees in Wisconsin, ideal for those seeking efficient pathways to start or advance their psychology careers.

Online psychology degrees pave the way for varied career pathways—such as case management, behavioral analysis, or school counseling—making them a versatile and accessible choice for students nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Barnaby Nelson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles