World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 43 7440 6860 3204 2893 157 6483

Katherine J. Bangen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katherine J. Bangen between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katherine J. Bangen published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 20 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 10 publications
2004 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katherine J. Bangen: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 6
2010 6
2011 2
2012 4
2013 6
2014 8
2015 8
2016 6
2017 7
2018 12
2019 15
2020 13
2021 23
2022 16
2023 18
2024 10
2025 10
Total 173
Download as CSV

Katherine J. Bangen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine J. Bangen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 157 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459 157
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Katherine J. Bangen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine J. Bangen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 43
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Katherine J. Bangen is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health, neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, physiology, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their scientific work extensively covers topics related to dementia and cognitive impairment research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, cardiovascular health and disease prevention, neurological disease mechanisms and treatments, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, functional brain connectivity studies, as well as advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications.

Katherine J. Bangen has published research in numerous venues, frequently contributing to journals such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Innovation in Aging

Among recent papers associated with Katherine J. Bangen are:

  • Outcomes of Randomized Clinical Trials of Interventions to Enhance Social, Emotional, and Spiritual Components of Wisdom, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • APOE interacts with tau PET to influence memory independently of amyloid PET in older adults without dementia, 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Regional hyperperfusion in older adults with objectively-defined subtle cognitive decline, 2020, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • Prediabetes Is Associated With Brain Hypometabolism and Cognitive Decline in a Sex-Dependent Manner: A Longitudinal Study of Nondemented Older Adults, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Elevated plasma neurofilament light predicts a faster rate of cognitive decline over 5 years in participants with objectively-defined subtle cognitive decline and MCI, 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia

They collaborate frequently with various co-authors, including:

  • Kelsey R. Thomas
  • Mark W. Bondi
  • Alexandra J. Weigand
  • Emily C. Edmonds
  • Lisa Delano-Wood

Best Publications

  • Decreased white matter integrity in late-myelinating fiber pathways in Alzheimer's disease supports retrogenesis.

    Nikki H. Stricker;B. C. Schweinsburg;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina E. Wierenga;Christina E. Wierenga

  • The Role of Early-Life Educational Quality and Literacy in Explaining Racial Disparities in Cognition in Late Life

    Shannon Sisco;Alden L. Gross;Regina A. Shih;Bonnie C. Sachs

  • Defining and Assessing Wisdom: A Review of the Literature

    Katherine J. Bangen;Thomas W. Meeks;Dilip V. Jeste

  • Altered cortical visual processing in PD with hallucinations: an fMRI study.

    G. T. Stebbins;C. G. Goetz;M. C. Carrillo;K. J. Bangen

  • Cerebral perfusion and oxygenation differences in Alzheimer's disease risk

    Adam S. Fleisher;Katherine M. Podraza;Katherine J. Bangen;Curtis Taylor

  • Gray Matter Atrophy in Patients With Ischemic Stroke With Cognitive Impairment

    Glenn T. Stebbins;David L. Nyenhuis;Changsheng Wang;Jennifer L. Cox

  • Are Empirically-Derived Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment Consistent with Conventional Subtypes?

    Lindsay R. Clark;Lisa Delano-Wood;David J. Libon;Carrie R. McDonald

  • Combined neuropathological pathways account for age‐related risk of dementia

    Melinda C. Power;Elizabeth Mormino;Anja Soldan;Bryan D. James

  • Complex activities of daily living vary by mild cognitive impairment subtype.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Amy J. Jak;Dawn M. Schiehser;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • Cerebral Blood Flow and BOLD Responses to a Memory Encoding Task: A Comparison Between Healthy Young and Elderly Adults

    Khaled Restom;Katherine J. Bangen;Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Joanna E. Perthen

  • Pulse Pressure in Relation to Tau-Mediated Neurodegeneration, Cerebral Amyloidosis, and Progression to Dementia in Very Old Adults

    Daniel A. Nation;Emily C. Edmonds;Katherine J. Bangen;Katherine J. Bangen;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood

  • Differential age effects on cerebral blood flow and BOLD response to encoding: associations with cognition and stroke risk.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Khaled Restom;Thomas T. Liu;Amy J. Jak

  • APOE genotype modifies the relationship between midlife vascular risk factors and later cognitive decline.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Alexa Beiser;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Daniel A. Nation

  • Objective subtle cognitive difficulties predict future amyloid accumulation and neurodegeneration

    Kelsey R. Thomas;Katherine J. Bangen;Alexandra J. Weigand;Emily C. Edmonds

  • Aggregate effects of vascular risk factors on cerebrovascular changes in autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Daniel A. Nation;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Gali H. Weissberger

  • A new scale for assessing wisdom based on common domains and a neurobiological model: The San Diego Wisdom Scale (SD-WISE)

    Michael L. Thomas;Katherine J. Bangen;Barton W. Palmer;Averria Sirkin Martin

  • Assessment of Alzheimer's disease risk with functional magnetic resonance imaging: an arterial spin labeling study.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Khaled Restom;Thomas T. Liu;Christina E. Wierenga;Christina E. Wierenga

  • Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cognitive Change in a Multiethnic Elderly Cohort.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Katherine J. Bangen;Yian Gu;Alden L. Gross;Brooke C. Schneider

  • Reduced Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Relates to Poorer Cognition in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.

    Katherine J. Bangen;Madeleine L. Werhane;Alexandra J. Weigand;Alexandra J. Weigand;Emily C. Edmonds;Emily C. Edmonds

  • Effect of Mild Cognitive Impairment and APOE Genotype on Resting Cerebral Blood Flow and its Association with Cognition

    Christina E Wierenga;Sheena I Dev;David D Shin;Lindsay R Clark

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark W. Bondi
Mark W. Bondi University of California, San Diego
Lisa Delano-Wood
Lisa Delano-Wood University of California, San Diego
Emily C. Edmonds
Emily C. Edmonds University of Arizona
Amy J. Jak
Amy J. Jak University of California, San Diego
Christina E. Wierenga
Christina E. Wierenga University of California, San Diego
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Rhoda Au
Rhoda Au Boston University
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University
Douglas Galasko
Douglas Galasko University of California, San Diego
Thomas T. Liu
Thomas T. Liu University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in neuroscience opens doors to many overlapping fields. Professionals interested in mental health, counseling, or social work can take advantage of flexible online education routes. For those seeking advanced credentials, accelerated online msw programs offer a fast way to start a rewarding social work career.

If you’re considering roles that blend neuroscience with behavioral sciences, pursuing a fast track psychology degree can broaden your knowledge and job prospects quickly. Similarly, counseling is a popular field for neuroscience graduates. Programs that are cacrep accredited ensure adherence to the highest professional standards and can lead to licensure.

For those prioritizing affordability alongside quality, explore online clinical mental health counseling degree options. These pathways provide accessible education for aspiring counselors, therapists, or allied health professionals—all of which pair well with a background in neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine J. Bangen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles