World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
124
Citations
72208
World Ranking
3172
National Ranking
1750

Psychology

D-Index
124
Citations
70921
World Ranking
211
National Ranking
134

Neuroscience

D-Index
124
Citations
72123
World Ranking
331
National Ranking
200

David P. Salmon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Salmon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 475 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David P. Salmon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Salmon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David P. Salmon is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine with a strong focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Neurology, and Geriatrics and Gerontology. Research topics addressed include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Alzheimer's Disease research and treatments, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Frailty in Older Adults, and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases.

Salmon's recent publications illustrate their engagement with neurodegenerative disorders and cognitive decline. Notable papers include:

  • Research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies, 2020, Neurology
  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium, 2020, Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle University)
  • Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease in relation to neuropathology and cognitive change, 2022, Acta Neuropathologica
  • Cognitive decline profiles differ in Parkinson disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies, 2020, Neurology
  • Cognition at Each Stage of Lewy Body Disease with Co-occurring Alzheimer's Disease Pathology, 2021, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Frequent collaborators who have co-authored multiple papers with Salmon include Douglas Galasko, Diane M. Jacobs, Denis S. Smirnov, Howard Feldman, and Mark W. Bondi. This reflects a broad network of research partnerships in related fields.

Salmon's work appears across a range of leading publication venues, emphasizing their involvement in Alzheimer's and dementia research communities. These venues include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Neurology
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Best Publications

  • Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

    Katya Rascovsky;John R. Hodges;David Knopman;Mario F. Mendez

  • Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer's disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment.

    Robert D. Terry;Eliezer Masliah;David P. Salmon;Nelson Butters

  • Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) Report of the consortium on DLB international workshop

    I. G. Mckeith;D. Galasko;K. Kosaka;E. K. Perry

  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium

    Ian G. McKeith;Bradley F. Boeve;Dennis W. DIckson;Glenda Halliday

  • The prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease in Shanghai, China: Impact of age, gender, and education

    M Y Zhang;R Katzman;D Salmon;H Jin

  • A phase 1 clinical trial of nerve growth factor gene therapy for Alzheimer disease

    Mark H Tuszynski;Mark H Tuszynski;Leon Thal;Leon Thal;Mary Pay;David P Salmon

  • The Lewy body variant of Alzheimer's disease A clinical and pathologic entity

    L. Hansen;D. Salmon;D. Galasko;E. Masliah

  • A Chinese version of the mini-mental state examination; Impact of illiteracy in a Shanghai dementia survey

    Robert Katzman;Mingyuan Zhang;Ouang-Ya-Qu;Zhengyu Wang

  • The Alzheimer's Disease Centers' Uniform Data Set (UDS): the neuropsychologic test battery.

    Sandra Weintraub;David Salmon;Nathaniel Mercaldo;Steven Ferris

  • Semantic memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: failure of access or degraded knowledge?

    John R. Hodges;David P. Salmon;Nelson Butters

  • Comparisons of Verbal Fluency Tasks in the Detection of Dementia of the Alzheimer Type

    Andreas U. Monsch;Mark W. Bondi;Nelson Butters;David P. Salmon

  • Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment.

    Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak;Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina Wierenga;Christina Wierenga

  • Neuropsychological evidence for multiple implicit memory systems: a comparison of Alzheimer's, Huntington's, and Parkinson's disease patients

    William C. Heindel;David P. Salmon;Clifford W. Shults;Patricia A. Walicke

  • The A4 Study: Stopping AD Before Symptoms Begin?

    Reisa A. Sperling;Dorene M. Rentz;Dorene M. Rentz;Keith A. Johnson;Keith A. Johnson;Jason Karlawish

  • The Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite Measuring Amyloid-Related Decline

    Michael C. Donohue;Reisa A. Sperling;David P. Salmon;Dorene M. Rentz

  • Episodic and Semantic Memory: A Comparison of Amnesic and Demented Patients

    Nelson Butters;Eric Granholm;David P. Salmon;Igor Grant

  • Neuropsychological Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment Improves Diagnostic Precision, Biomarker Associations, and Progression Rates

    Mark W. Bondi;Emily C. Edmonds;Amy J. Jak;Lindsay R. Clark

  • Research criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies

    Ian G. McKeith;Tanis J. Ferman;Alan J. Thomas;Frédéric Blanc

  • The Neuropsychological Profile of Alzheimer Disease

    Sandra Weintraub;Alissa H. Wicklund;David P. Salmon

  • Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease.

    Isabelle Rouleau;David P Salmon;Nelson Butters;Nelson Butters;Colleen Kennedy;Colleen Kennedy

  • Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): Report of the Consortium on DLB International Workshop

    Ian G. McKeith

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas Galasko
Douglas Galasko University of California, San Diego
Mark W. Bondi
Mark W. Bondi University of California, San Diego
Lisa Delano-Wood
Lisa Delano-Wood University of California, San Diego
Dean C. Delis
Dean C. Delis University of California, San Diego
Lawrence A. Hansen
Lawrence A. Hansen University of California, San Diego
Amy J. Jak
Amy J. Jak University of California, San Diego
Nelson Butters
Nelson Butters University of California, San Diego
William C. Heindel
William C. Heindel Brown University
Emily C. Edmonds
Emily C. Edmonds University of Arizona
Eliezer Masliah
Eliezer Masliah National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA often leads students to consider related online degrees, especially in social work and behavioral sciences. These interconnected fields not only expand your academic options but also offer diverse career paths. From counseling and case management to mental health advocacy and community outreach, graduates can contribute meaningfully across a range of roles.

Social work is a popular alternative or complementary degree for psychology students. Flexible online and hybrid programs allow learners to specialize in areas such as clinical social work or school counseling. If you’re interested in regional program comparisons, check out the best social work degree programs in Arkansas or explore the best social work programs in Columbus. Interested in other states? Review the top social work degrees in Houston and the top social work programs in Idaho.

By researching accredited programs and current job trends, students maximize their options for meaningful, impactful careers in social services, therapy, and counseling—both online and on campus.

Best Scientists Citing David P. Salmon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles