World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Glenda M. Halliday

Glenda M. Halliday

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
142
Citations
90465
World Ranking
220
National Ranking
7

Medicine

D-Index
148
Citations
104454
World Ranking
1224
National Ranking
34

Glenda M. Halliday publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenda M. Halliday sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 930 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Glenda M. Halliday D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenda M. Halliday sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 148 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Glenda M. Halliday is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has an extensive research portfolio in medicine and neuroscience. Their work predominantly explores neurology, physiology, molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and genetics, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to neurological disorders.

Their research focuses on a variety of topics including:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

Halliday has published frequently in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Movement Disorders
  • Acta Neuropathologica
  • Scientific Reports

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Halliday are:

  • "Parkinson disease-associated cognitive impairment" (2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers)
  • "The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy" (2022, Movement Disorders)
  • "Genome sequencing analysis identifies new loci associated with Lewy body dementia and provides insights into its genetic architecture" (2021, Nature Genetics)
  • "TDP-43 proteinopathies: a new wave of neurodegenerative diseases" (2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry)
  • "Neuropathological consensus criteria for the evaluation of Lewy pathology in post-mortem brains: a multi-centre study" (2021, Acta Neuropathologica)

Frequent collaborators in Halliday's research include:

  • Olivier Piguet
  • YuHong Fu
  • John B. Kwok
  • Woojin S. Kim
  • Simon J.G. Lewis

Best Publications

  • MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease

    Ronald B. Postuma;Daniela Berg;Matthew Stern;Werner Poewe

  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Third report of the DLB Consortium

    I. G. McKeith;I. G. McKeith;D. W. Dickson;J. Lowe;M. Emre

  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium

    Ian G. McKeith;Bradley F. Boeve;Dennis W. DIckson;Glenda Halliday

  • The Sydney Multicenter Study of Parkinson's Disease : The Inevitability of Dementia at 20 years

    Mariese A. Hely;Wayne G.J. Reid;Michael A. Adena;Glenda M. Halliday

  • Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies

    Mike A Nalls;Cornelis Blauwendraat;Costanza L Vallerga;Karl Heilbron

  • Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE): consensus working group report.

    Peter T. Nelson;Dennis W. Dickson;John Q. Trojanowski;Clifford R. Jack

  • MDS research criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease

    Daniela Berg;Ronald B. Postuma;Charles H. Adler;Bastiaan R. Bloem

  • Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Nigel J. Cairns;Eileen H. Bigio;Ian R A Mackenzie;Manuela Neumann

  • Disease duration and the integrity of the nigrostriatal system in Parkinson’s disease

    Jeffrey H. Kordower;C. Warren Olanow;Hemraj B. Dodiya;Yaping Chu

  • Ventral tegmental (A10) system: neurobiology. 1. Anatomy and connectivity.

    Robert D. Oades;Glenda M. Halliday

  • Parkinson disease-associated cognitive impairment.

    Dag Aarsland;Dag Aarsland;Lucia Batzu;Glenda M Halliday;Gert J Geurtsen

  • Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update

    Ian R. A. Mackenzie;Manuela Neumann;Eileen H. Bigio;Nigel J. Cairns

  • Neuropathological assessment of Parkinson's disease: refining the diagnostic criteria.

    Dennis W Dickson;Heiko Braak;John E Duda;Charles Duyckaerts

  • Selective neuronal vulnerability in Parkinson disease.

    D. James Surmeier;José A. Obeso;José A. Obeso;Glenda M. Halliday;Glenda M. Halliday

  • Missing pieces in the Parkinson's disease puzzle.

    Jose A Obeso;Maria C Rodriguez-Oroz;Christopher G Goetz;Concepcion Marin;Concepcion Marin

  • Past, present, and future of Parkinson's disease: A special essay on the 200th Anniversary of the Shaking Palsy

    J.A. Obeso;M. Stamelou;M. Stamelou;C.G. Goetz;W. Poewe

  • Clinicopathological correlates in frontotemporal dementia.

    John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;R. Rhys Davies;John H. Xuereb;Barney Casey

  • Visual hallucinations in Lewy body disease relate to Lewy bodies in the temporal lobe.

    A. J. Harding;G. A. Broe;G. M. Halliday

  • Evidence for α-synuclein prions causing multiple system atrophy in humans with parkinsonism

    Stanley B. Prusiner;Amanda L. Woerman;Daniel A. Mordes;Joel C. Watts

  • The cerebral cortex is damaged in chronic alcoholics

    J.J Kril;G.M Halliday;G.M Halliday;M.D Svoboda;H Cartwright

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney
Jillian J. Kril
Jillian J. Kril University of Sydney
John B.J. Kwok
John B.J. Kwok University of Sydney
Olivier Piguet
Olivier Piguet University of Sydney
Matthew C. Kiernan
Matthew C. Kiernan Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Kay L. Double
Kay L. Double University of Sydney
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Simon J.G. Lewis
Simon J.G. Lewis Macquarie University
Carol Dobson-Stone
Carol Dobson-Stone University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in medicine often means exploring various educational routes. Today, online programs create flexible pathways for career advancement in healthcare. Those with an associate’s degree in nursing can streamline their education by enrolling in adn to np bridge programs, allowing them to move from registered nurse to nurse practitioner roles efficiently.

Alternatively, those interested in nutrition and preventative health should consider studying through the best online nutrition programs, perfect for building a career in dietetics or wellness counseling.

Healthcare management is also essential for future leaders. Earning a degree from cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs prepares graduates to oversee hospitals or clinics with the skills employers value most.

Lastly, for nurses seeking to advance without traditional clinical requirements, there are now rn to bsn with no clinicals options, designed to fit around busy professional lives.

These online degrees pave the way for diverse roles in medicine, healthcare leadership, and wellness, broadening opportunities beyond the traditional path of medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Glenda M. Halliday

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles