World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
10655
World Ranking
4921
National Ranking
135

Kay L. Double publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay L. Double sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 123 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kay L. Double D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay L. Double sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kay L. Double is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Neurology, which accounts for the majority of their work. Additional areas of study include Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Spectroscopy.

Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Trace Elements in Health
  • Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

The scientist's research outputs have appeared frequently in several publication venues, with multiple papers published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Acta Neuropathologica Communications, and PLoS ONE. Other notable venues include Angewandte Chemie International Edition and the Journal of Neural Transmission.

Notable recent papers by Kay L. Double include:

  • "Superoxide Dismutase 1 in Health and Disease: How a Frontline Antioxidant Becomes Neurotoxic," 2020, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • "A brief history of brain iron accumulation in Parkinson disease and related disorders," 2022, Journal of Neural Transmission
  • "Co-deposition of SOD1, TDP-43 and p62 proteinopathies in ALS: evidence for multifaceted pathways underlying neurodegeneration," 2022, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • "Near-Infrared Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe for Detecting Endogenous Cu2+ in the Brain," 2024, ACS Sensors
  • "Simultaneous structural and elemental nano-imaging of human brain tissue," 2020, Chemical Science

Frequent collaborators include Benjamin G. Trist, Veronica Cottam, Dominic J. Hare, Peter J. Crouch, and Amr H. Abdeen, with the highest number of joint publications attributed to Benjamin G. Trist.

Best Publications

  • Oxidative stress in the aging substantia nigra and the etiology of Parkinson's disease

    Benjamin G. Trist;Dominic J. Hare;Dominic J. Hare;Kay L. Double

  • Brain iron pathways and their relevance to Parkinson's disease.

    D Berg;M. Gerlach;M. B. H. Youdim;K. L. Double

  • Neuromelanin in human dopamine neurons: comparison with peripheral melanins and relevance to Parkinson's disease.

    H Fedorow;F Tribl;G Halliday;M Gerlach

  • Language-associated Cortical Regions Are Proportionally Larger in the Female Brain

    Jenny Harasty;Kay L. Double;Glenda M. Halliday;Jillian J. Kril

  • The relevance of iron in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease.

    Mario E. Götz;Kay Double;Manfred Gerlach;Moussa B. H. Youdim

  • Hippocampal Lewy pathology and cholinergic dysfunction are associated with dementia in Parkinson's disease.

    Hélène Hall;Stefanie Reyes;Natalie Landeck;Chris Bye

  • Regional Specificity of Brain Atrophy in Huntington's Disease

    G.M. Halliday;D.A. McRitchie;V. Macdonald;K.L. Double

  • Iron and dopamine: a toxic couple

    Dominic J. Hare;Dominic J. Hare;Kay L. Double

  • Topography of brain atrophy during normal aging and alzheimer's disease

    K.L. Double;G.M. Halliday;G.M. Halliday;J.J. Krill;J.J. Krill;J.A. Harasty

  • Copper pathology in vulnerable brain regions in Parkinson's disease.

    Katherine M. Davies;Katherine M. Davies;Sylvain Bohic;Sylvain Bohic;Sylvain Bohic;Asunción Carmona;Asunción Carmona;Richard Ortega;Richard Ortega

  • α-Synuclein redistributes to neuromelanin lipid in the substantia nigra early in Parkinson's disease

    Glenda M. Halliday;Anita Ophof;Melissa Broe;Poul H. Jensen

  • Identifying the pattern of olfactory deficits in Parkinson disease using the brief smell identification test.

    Kay L Double;Dominic B Rowe;Michael Hayes;Daniel K. Y Chan

  • Iron-binding characteristics of neuromelanin of the human substantia nigra.

    Kay L. Double;Manfred Gerlach;Volker Schünemann;Alfred X. Trautwein

  • The comparative biology of neuromelanin and lipofuscin in the human brain

    K L Double;V N Dedov;H Fedorow;E Kettle

  • Dopamine receptor agonists in current clinical use: comparative dopamine receptor binding profiles defined in the human striatum.

    M. Gerlach;K. Double;K. Double;T. Arzberger;F. Leblhuber

  • In Vitro Studies of Ferritin Iron Release and Neurotoxicity

    K. L. Double;M. Maywald;M. Schmittel;P. Riederer

  • Superoxide Dismutase 1 in Health and Disease: How a Frontline Antioxidant Becomes Neurotoxic.

    Benjamin G Trist;James B Hilton;Dominic J Hare;Dominic J Hare;Dominic J Hare;Peter J Crouch

  • Brain iron pathways and their relevance to Parkinson's disease.

    Unknown

  • Localization of copper and copper transporters in the human brain.

    Katherine M. Davies;Dominic J. Hare;Veronica Cottam;Nicholas Chen

  • A53T-Alpha-Synuclein Overexpression Impairs Dopamine Signaling and Striatal Synaptic Plasticity in Old Mice

    Alexander Kurz;Kay L. Double;Isabel Lastres-Becker;Alessandro Tozzi

  • Selective cell death in neurodegeneration: Why are some neurons spared in vulnerable regions?

    K.L. Double;S. Reyes;E.L. Werry;G.M. Halliday

  • Structural Characteristics of Human Substantia Nigra Neuromelanin and Synthetic Dopamine Melanins

    K L Double;L Zecca;P Costi;M Mauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenda M. Halliday
Glenda M. Halliday University of Sydney
Peter Riederer
Peter Riederer University of Würzburg
Cynthia Shannon Weickert
Cynthia Shannon Weickert University of New South Wales
Moussa B.H. Youdim
Moussa B.H. Youdim Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Olivier Piguet
Olivier Piguet University of Sydney
Luigi Zecca
Luigi Zecca National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Simon J.G. Lewis
Simon J.G. Lewis Macquarie University
Caroline Rae
Caroline Rae Neuroscience Research Australia
Deniz Kirik
Deniz Kirik Lund University
Daniela Berg
Daniela Berg University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kay L. Double

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles