World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
83
Citations
21917
World Ranking
1471
National Ranking
31

Janet L. Taylor publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet L. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 266 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Janet L. Taylor D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet L. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janet L. Taylor is affiliated with Edith Cowan University in Australia. Their research outputs span several interconnected fields primarily in medicine, neuroscience, and engineering. Specific subfields of study include biomedical engineering, neurology, cognitive neuroscience, orthopedics and sports medicine, and surgery.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas related to muscle function and nervous system control. Key topics include:

  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation studies
  • Motor control and adaptation
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Neuroscience and neural engineering
  • Spinal cord injury research
  • Sports performance and training

Janet L. Taylor has published multiple recent papers. Selected works include:

  • "Contralateral Effects of Unilateral Strength and Skill Training: Modified Delphi Consensus to Establish Key Aspects of Cross-Education," 2020, published in Sports Medicine
  • "Voluntary activation of muscle in humans: does serotonergic neuromodulation matter?" 2022, The Journal of Physiology
  • "Passive muscle stretching reduces estimates of persistent inward current strength in soleus motor units," 2020, Journal of Experimental Biology
  • "Enhanced serotonin availability amplifies fatigue perception and modulates the TMS-induced silent period during sustained low-intensity elbow flexions," 2020, The Journal of Physiology
  • "Age has no effect on ankle proprioception when movement history is controlled," 2020, Journal of Applied Physiology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Janet L. Taylor include:

  • Christopher Latella
  • Simon C. Gandevia
  • Justin J. Kavanagh
  • Anthony J. Blazevich
  • Jacob R. Thorstensen

The scientist's publications often appear in specific venues that specialize in neuroscience and applied physiology, such as:

  • European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • The Journal of Physiology
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology

Best Publications

  • Supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue: evidence for suboptimal output from the motor cortex.

    S C Gandevia;G M Allen;J E Butler;J L Taylor

  • A comparison of central aspects of fatigue in submaximal and maximal voluntary contractions

    Janet L. Taylor;Simon C. Gandevia

  • Neural Contributions to Muscle Fatigue: From the Brain to the Muscle and Back Again

    Janet J.L. Taylor;Markus M. Amann;Jacques Duchateau;Romain Meeusen

  • Measurement of voluntary activation of fresh and fatigued human muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Gabrielle Todd;Janet L. Taylor;S. C. Gandevia

  • CHANGES IN MOTOR CORTICAL EXCITABILITY DURING HUMAN MUSCLE FATIGUE

    J L Taylor;J E Butler;G M Allen;S C Gandevia

  • The effect of voluntary contraction on cortico-cortical inhibition in human motor cortex.

    M C Ridding;J L Taylor;J C Rothwell

  • Evidence for a supraspinal contribution to human muscle fatigue.

    Janet L Taylor;Gabrielle Todd;Simon C Gandevia

  • The effect of sustained low-intensity contractions on supraspinal fatigue in human elbow flexor muscles.

    Karen Søgaard;Simon C. Gandevia;Gabrielle Todd;Nicolas T. Petersen

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in controlled treatment studies: are some "sham" forms active?

    Colleen K Loo;Janet L Taylor;Janet L Taylor;Simon C Gandevia;Simon C Gandevia;Benjamin N McDarmont

  • Triggering of preprogrammed movements as reactions to masked stimuli

    J. L. Taylor;D. I. McCloskey

  • Changes in Segmental and Motor Cortical Output With Contralateral Muscle Contractions and Altered Sensory Inputs in Humans

    Tibor Hortobágyi;Janet L. Taylor;Nicolas T. Petersen;Gabrielle Russell

  • Changes in muscle afferents, motoneurons and motor drive during muscle fatigue.

    Janet L. Taylor;Jane E. Butler;S. C. Gandevia

  • Recovery of central and peripheral neuromuscular fatigue after exercise

    Timothy John Carroll;Janet L. Taylor;Simon C. Gandevia

  • Hyperthermia: a failure of the motor cortex and the muscle

    Gabrielle Todd;Jane E. Butler;Janet L. Taylor;S. C. Gandevia

  • Supraspinal fatigue during intermittent maximal voluntary contractions of the human elbow flexors

    Janet L. Taylor;Gabrielle M. Allen;Jane E. Butler;S. C. Gandevia

  • Motor commands contribute to human position sense

    Simon C. Gandevia;Janette L. Smith;Matthew Crawford;Uwe Proske

  • Supraspinal fatigue does not explain the sex difference in muscle fatigue of maximal contractions

    Sandra K. Hunter;Jane E. Butler;Gabrielle Todd;Simon C. Gandevia

  • Noninvasive stimulation of the human corticospinal tract

    J. L. Taylor;S. C. Gandevia

  • A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the motor system: an international consensus study.

    Lucinda S Chipchase;Siobhan M Schabrun;Leonardo Cohen;Paul W Hodges

  • Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task-dependent components.

    R C Fitzpatrick;J L Taylor;D I McCloskey

  • SAVANT-LIKE SKILLS EXPOSED IN NORMAL PEOPLE BY SUPPRESSING THE LEFT FRONTO-TEMPORAL LOBE

    Allan W. Snyder;Elaine Mulcahy;Janet L. Taylor;D. John Mitchell

  • Maximal force, voluntary activation and muscle soreness after eccentric damage to human elbow flexor muscles

    O. Prasartwuth;J. L. Taylor;S. C. Gandevia

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon C. Gandevia
Simon C. Gandevia Neuroscience Research Australia
Jane E. Butler
Jane E. Butler University of Sydney
Colleen Loo
Colleen Loo University of New South Wales
Philip B. Mitchell
Philip B. Mitchell University of New South Wales
Perminder S. Sachdev
Perminder S. Sachdev University of New South Wales
Michael C. Ridding
Michael C. Ridding University of South Australia
Donel Martin
Donel Martin University of New South Wales
Nicolas T. Petersen
Nicolas T. Petersen University of Copenhagen
Kay L. Double
Kay L. Double University of Sydney
Olivier Piguet
Olivier Piguet University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Janet L. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles