World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4244
World Ranking
8873
National Ranking
238

Inge Zijdewind publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inge Zijdewind sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 100 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Inge Zijdewind D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inge Zijdewind sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Inge Zijdewind is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields including Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

Their work covers a range of topics, with emphasis on muscle activation and electromyography studies, multiple sclerosis research, peripheral neuropathies and disorders, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, balance, gait, and falls prevention, motor control and adaptation, and salivary gland disorders and functions.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Neurophysiological impairments in multiple sclerosis-Central and peripheral motor pathways, 2020, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
  • Age-specific modulation of intermuscular beta coherence during gait before and after experimentally induced fatigue, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Older Compared With Younger Adults Performed 467 Fewer Sit-to-Stand Trials, Accompanied by Small Changes in Muscle Activation and Voluntary Force, 2021, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Fatigue following mild traumatic brain injury relates to visual processing and effort perception in the context of motor performance, 2021, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Fatigue in primary Sjögren's syndrome is associated with an objective decline in physical performance, pain and depression, 2022, Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

Frequent co-authors in their work include Roeland F. Prak, Paulo Cezar Rocha dos Santos, Claudine J. C. Lamoth, Lílian Teresa Bucken Gobbi, and Tibor Hortobágyi, indicating collaborations across various research projects.

Their papers have appeared in multiple publication venues reflecting diverse interests such as Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Scientific Reports, Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, and the Journal of Neurotrauma.

Best Publications

  • Motor fatigue and cognitive task performance in humans

    Monicque M. Lorist;Daniel Kernell;Theo F. Meijman;Inge Zijdewind

  • Effects of imagery motor training on torque production of ankle plantar flexor muscles.

    Inge Zijdewind;Sjoukje T Toering;Bram Bessem;Occo Van Der Laan

  • Corticospinal excitability during observation and imagery of simple and complex hand tasks: implications for motor rehabilitation.

    Meyke Roosink;Inge Zijdewind

  • Effects of motor fatigue on human brain activity, an fMRI study

    Hiske van Duinen;Remco Renken;Natasha M. Maurits;Inge Zijdewind

  • Bilateral interactions during contractions of intrinsic hand muscles.

    Inge Zijdewind;Daniel Kernell

  • The effect of caffeine on cognitive task performance and motor fatigue

    Hiske van Duinen;Monicque M. Lorist;Inge Zijdewind

  • Influence of a voluntary fatigue test on the contralateral homologous muscle in humans

    Inge Zijdewind;Machiel J Zwarts;Daniel Kernell

  • Relation between muscle and brain activity during isometric contractions of the first dorsal interosseus muscle

    Hiske van Duinen;Remco Renken;Natasha M. Maurits;Inge Zijdewind

  • Motor unit activation order during electrically evoked contractions of paralyzed or partially paralyzed muscles.

    Christine K. Thomas;Gary Nelson;Lara Than;Inge Zijdewind

  • Muscle fatigue induced by stimulation with and without doublets.

    B Bigland-Ritchie;Inge Zijdewind;CK Thomas

  • Fatigue perceived by multiple sclerosis patients is associated with muscle fatigue.

    Anneke Steens;Astrid de Vries;Jolien Hemmen;Thea Heersema

  • The Assessment of Motor Fatigability in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review:

    Deborah Severijns;Inge Zijdewind;Ulrik Dalgas;Ilse Lamers

  • The origin of activity in the biceps brachii muscle during voluntary contractions of the contralateral elbow flexor muscles

    Inge Zijdewind;Jane E. Butler;Simon C. Gandevia;Janet L. Taylor

  • Fatigue of muscles weakened by death of motoneurons

    Christine K. Thomas;Inge Zijdewind

  • Direct and crossed effects of somatosensory stimulation on neuronal excitability and motor performance in humans.

    Menno Veldman;N. A. Maffiuletti;M. Hallett;Inge Zijdewind

  • Motor unit firing during and after voluntary contractions of human thenar muscles weakened by spinal cord injury.

    Inge Zijdewind;Christine K. Thomas

  • Voluntary Activation and Cortical Activity During a Sustained Maximal Contraction: An fMRI Study

    Marijn Post;Anneke Steens;Remco Renken;Natasha M. Maurits

  • Mechanisms underlying muscle fatigue differ between multiple sclerosis patients and controls: a combined electrophysiological and neuroimaging study.

    Anneke Steens;D. J. Heersema;Natasha M. Maurits;Remco J. Renken

  • Contralateral muscle activity and fatigue in the human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

    Marijn Post;Sibel Bayrak;Daniel Kernell;Inge Zijdewind

  • Spontaneous motor unit behavior in human thenar muscles after spinal cord injury

    Inge Zijdewind;Christine K. Thomas

  • Reduced cortical activity during maximal bilateral contractions of the index finger.

    Marijn Post;Hiske van Duinen;Anneke Steens;Remco Renken

Frequent Co-Authors

Tibor Hortobágyi
Tibor Hortobágyi University of Debrecen
Christine K. Thomas
Christine K. Thomas University of Miami
Remco J. Renken
Remco J. Renken University Medical Center Groningen
Natasha M. Maurits
Natasha M. Maurits University of Groningen
Daniel Kernell
Daniel Kernell University of Groningen
Monicque M. Lorist
Monicque M. Lorist University of Groningen
Jane E. Butler
Jane E. Butler University of Sydney
Giacomo Koch
Giacomo Koch University of Ferrara
Christian Keysers
Christian Keysers University of Amsterdam
Simon C. Gandevia
Simon C. Gandevia Neuroscience Research Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to various rewarding online degree options and career trajectories. If you’re aiming for clinical work or advanced practice, consider online psyd programs. These offer the flexibility to pursue doctoral-level clinical psychology training while balancing other commitments.

For those interested in counseling or therapy, accelerated mft programs provide a fast-track route to become a licensed marriage and family therapist. If you’re starting your academic journey, an accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited can help you earn your qualification swiftly, letting you advance to graduate study or enter the workforce sooner.

When charting your career path, it’s wise to consider earning potential. Review the top paying degrees to see which fields offer the highest salaries for graduates. This insight can help you align your studies in neuroscience with promising, high-return career options.

Best Scientists Citing Inge Zijdewind

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles