World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David F. Collins

David F. Collins

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
6939
World Ranking
7207
National Ranking
426

David F. Collins publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Collins sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 100 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David F. Collins D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Collins sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David F. Collins is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Neuroscience, and Engineering, with a focus on Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Neurology.

Their work covers several main topics including muscle activation and electromyography studies, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, sports performance and training, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, effects of vibration on health, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, and neuroscience and neural engineering.

Among Collins's recent publications are the following papers:

  • "Enhancing Adaptations to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training Interventions," 2021, published in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
  • "Neuromuscular determinants of explosive torque: Differences among strength-trained and untrained young and older men," 2020, published in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
  • "Decreased excitability of motor axons contributes substantially to contraction fatigability during neuromuscular electrical stimulation," 2020, published in Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
  • "Indirect Vibration of the Upper Limbs Alters Transmission Along Spinal but Not Corticospinal Pathways," 2021, published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "Contraction fatigue, strength adaptations, and discomfort during conventional versus wide-pulse, high-frequency, neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a systematic review," 2021, published in Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism

David F. Collins frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
  • Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Collins include Trevor S. Barss, Dylan Miller, Amit N. Pujari, João Luíz Quagliotti Durigan, and Bailey W. M. Sallis.

Best Publications

  • Cutaneous Receptors Contribute to Kinesthesia at the Index Finger, Elbow, and Knee

    David F. Collins;Kathryn M. Refshauge;Gabrielle Todd;Simon C. Gandevia

  • Reversal of the influence of group Ib afferents from plantaris on activity in medial gastrocnemius muscle during locomotor activity

    K. G. Pearson;D. F. Collins

  • Sensori-sensory afferent conditioning with leg movement: Gain control in spinal reflex and ascending paths

    J.D Brooke;J Cheng;D.F Collins;W.E Mcilroy

  • Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley

    A. J. Bergquist;J. M. Clair;O. Lagerquist;C. S. Mang

  • MOVEMENT ILLUSIONS EVOKED BY ENSEMBLE CUTANEOUS INPUT FROM THE DORSUM OF THE HUMAN HAND

    D F Collins;A Prochazka

  • Large Involuntary Forces Consistent with Plateau-Like Behavior of Human Motoneurons

    D. F. Collins;D. Burke;S. C. Gandevia

  • Central contributions to contractions evoked by tetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

    David F. Collins

  • Sustained contractions produced by plateau-like behaviour in human motoneurones

    D. F. Collins;D. Burke;S. C. Gandevia

  • Spinal cord microstimulation generates functional limb movements in chronically implanted cats.

    Vivian K. Mushahwar;David F. Collins;Arthur Prochazka

  • Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: quadriceps femoris

    Austin J. Bergquist;Matheus J. Wiest;David F. Collins

  • Possible contributions of CPG activity to the control of rhythmic human arm movement.

    E Paul Zehr;Timothy J Carroll;Romeo Chua;David F Collins

  • Effect of rhythmic arm movement on reflexes in the legs: modulation of soleus H-reflexes and somatosensory conditioning.

    Alain Frigon;David F. Collins;E. Paul Zehr

  • Human interlimb reflexes evoked by electrical stimulation of cutaneous nerves innervating the hand and foot.

    Paul E. Zehr;David F. Collins;Romeo Chua

  • Proprioception: peripheral inputs and perceptual interactions.

    Simon C. Gandevia;Kathyrn M. Refshauge;David F. Collins

  • Chronotype influences diurnal variations in the excitability of the human motor cortex and the ability to generate torque during a maximum voluntary contraction.

    Alexander S. Tamm;Olle Lagerquist;Alejandro L. Ley;David F. Collins

  • Wide-pulse-width, high-frequency neuromuscular stimulation: implications for functional electrical stimulation.

    Evan R. L. Baldwin;Piotr M. Klakowicz;David F. Collins

  • Sensory integration in the perception of movements at the human metacarpophalangeal joint.

    D. F. Collins;K. M. Refshauge;S. C. Gandevia

  • Movement features and H-reflex modulation. II. Passive rotation, movement velocity and single leg movement.

    W.E. McIllroy;D.F. Collins;J.D. Brooke

  • Influence of stimulus pulse width on M-waves, H-reflexes, and torque during tetanic low-intensity neuromuscular stimulation.

    Olle Lagerquist;David F. Collins

  • Forces consistent with plateau-like behaviour of spinal neurons evoked in patients with spinal cord injuries

    P. Nickolls;D. F. Collins;R. B. Gorman;David Burke

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon C. Gandevia
Simon C. Gandevia Neuroscience Research Australia
E. Paul Zehr
E. Paul Zehr University of Victoria
Alain Frigon
Alain Frigon Université de Sherbrooke
Arthur Prochazka
Arthur Prochazka University of Alberta
Markus Stoffel
Markus Stoffel University of Geneva
David Burke
David Burke University of Sydney
Douglas J. Weber
Douglas J. Weber Carnegie Mellon University
John R. Hutchinson
John R. Hutchinson Royal Veterinary College
Kathryn M. Refshauge
Kathryn M. Refshauge University of Sydney
Eddy Moors
Eddy Moors Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Neuroscience in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden your career options. Many students are now considering accelerated bachelor degree programs to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner. These online programs often offer greater flexibility and can be completed at your own pace — making them ideal for busy or working students.

Choosing the right major is equally important. Fields related to Neuroscience consistently appear on lists of the best bachelor degrees and are considered some of the most lucrative degrees, leading to rewarding careers in research, healthcare, technology, and more.

If affordability is a concern, there are many accredited online colleges that accept fafsa, helping students access financial aid and reduce tuition costs. Researching degree pathways, potential salaries, and aid options can help you make an informed decision about your Neuroscience education.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Collins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles