World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard G. Carson

Richard G. Carson

Award Badge
Neuroscience
Ireland
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
10589
World Ranking
4054
National Ranking
17

Richard G. Carson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard G. Carson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 218 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard G. Carson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard G. Carson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Ireland Leader Award

Overview

Richard G. Carson is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a strong focus on medicine and neuroscience, contributing to a substantial body of work in both fields.

The main fields of study in their research include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these areas, Carson has explored several subfields, notably:

  • Hematology
  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Genetics

Their principal research topics cover a range of subjects relevant to both clinical and experimental science:

  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Quinazolinone synthesis and applications

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Aurore Perrot
  • Philippe Moreau
  • Cyrille Hulin
  • Pieter Sonneveld
  • Xavier Leleu

Carson's publications are commonly found in these venues:

  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • The Journal of Physiology
  • Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Blood

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on both clinical and physiological aspects of neuroscience and medicine. Notable works include:

  • "Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Amplitude normalization matrix," 2020, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
  • "Inter-hemispheric inhibition sculpts the output of neural circuits by co-opting the two cerebral hemispheres," 2020, The Journal of Physiology
  • "Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: High-density surface electromyography matrix," 2022, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
  • "Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Terminology matrix," 2021, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
  • "Daratumumab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible or transplant-deferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the randomized phase 3 CEPHEUS trial," 2025, Nature Medicine

Best Publications

  • Neural pathways mediating bilateral interactions between the upper limbs

    Richard Carson;Richard Carson

  • Neural adaptations to resistance training: implications for movement control.

    Timothy J. Carroll;Stephan Riek;Richard G. Carson

  • Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Amplitude normalization matrix.

    Manuela Besomi;Paul W. Hodges;Edward A. Clancy;Jaap Van Dieën

  • The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans

    Timothy J. Carroll;Stephan Riek;Richard G. Carson

  • Reliability of the input-output properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

    Timothy J Carroll;Stephan Riek;Richard G Carson

  • Expressions of asymmetries and anchoring in bimanual coordination

    Winston D. Byblow;Richard G. Carson;David Goodman

  • Central and peripheral mediation of human force sensation following eccentric or concentric contractions

    Richard G. Carson;Stephan Riek;Nosratollah Shahbazpour

  • The consequences of resistance training for movement control in older adults

    Benjamin K. Barry;Richard G. Carson

  • Get a grip: individual variations in grip strength are a marker of brain health

    Richard G. Carson

  • Neural pathways mediating cross education of motor function.

    Kathy L. Ruddy;Kathy L. Ruddy;Richard G. Carson;Richard G. Carson

  • Excitability changes in human forearm corticospinal projections and spinal reflex pathways during rhythmic voluntary movement of the opposite limb

    Richard Carson;S. Riek;D.C. Mackey;D.C. Mackey;D.P. Meichenbaum;D.P. Meichenbaum

  • Phase Transitions and Critical Fluctuations in Rhythmic Coordination of Ipsilateral Hand and Foot.

    Richard G. Carson;David Goodman;J. A. S. Kelso;Digby Elliott

  • Modulation of human corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation

    Richard G. Carson;Richard G. Carson;Niamh Clare Kennedy;Niamh Clare Kennedy

  • Asymmetries in the regulation of visually guided aiming.

    Richard G. Carson;David Goodman;Romeo Chua;Digby Elliott

  • Haptic information stabilizes and destabilizes coordination dynamics

    J.A.S. Kelso;P.W. Fink;C.R. DeLaplain;Richard Carson

  • The dynamics of bimanual circle drawing

    Richard G. Carson;Julie Thomas;Jeffery J. Summers;Megan R. Walters

  • Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry

    Steven Mark Miller;Guang B Liu;Trung Thanh Ngo;Gregory S Hooper

  • Governing coordination: behavioural principles and neural correlates.

    Richard Carson;J.A.S. Kelso

  • The contribution of vision to asymmetries in manual aiming

    Richard G. Carson;Romeo Chua;Digby Elliott;David Goodman

  • Asymmetries in the Preparation and Control of Manual Aiming Movements

    Digby Elliott;Eric A. Roy;David Goodman;Richard G. Carson

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan Riek
Stephan Riek University of Queensland
James R. Tresilian
James R. Tresilian University of Warwick
Winston D. Byblow
Winston D. Byblow University of Auckland
Jeffery J. Summers
Jeffery J. Summers Liverpool John Moores University
Digby Elliott
Digby Elliott McMaster University
Timothy N. Welsh
Timothy N. Welsh University of Toronto
Romeo Chua
Romeo Chua University of British Columbia
Mark Mon-Williams
Mark Mon-Williams University of Leeds
Bruce Abernethy
Bruce Abernethy University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience graduates often explore a wide range of career options, from research and healthcare to technology and education. Many students are attracted to the field, not only due to scientific curiosity but also because some neuroscience-related roles are among the highest paying majors. Specializing further or enhancing your credentials can open doors to competitive positions across multiple industries.

For those seeking flexibility or balancing work and study, pursuing a neuroscience-related degree or certificate online is an increasingly popular path. There are fafsa-approved online certificate programs available, allowing you to study remotely while remaining eligible for federal student aid.

Interested in credentials that quickly boost your employability? Consider enrolling in online certificate programs that pay well, some of which overlap with neuroscience specialties like data analysis, bioinformatics, or cognitive psychology.

If affordability and accessibility are primary factors, look into the cheapest easiest online degree options. These programs can provide a foundational education at lower costs, making it easier to break into the neurosciences or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard G. Carson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles