World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
8407
World Ranking
5964
National Ranking
409

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
9537
World Ranking
4957
National Ranking
285

Romeo Chua publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Romeo Chua sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 222 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Romeo Chua D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Romeo Chua sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Romeo Chua is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of neuroscience, with particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, physical therapy, sports therapy and rehabilitation, biomedical engineering, social psychology, and orthopedics and sports medicine.

The main topics addressed in their research include motor control and adaptation, balance, gait, and falls prevention, muscle activation and electromyography studies, action observation and synchronization, vestibular and auditory disorders, effects of vibration on health, and tactile and sensory interactions.

Romeo Chua's recent publications cover a range of relevant topics in neuroscience and related fields. Notable papers include:

  • "Learning to stand with unexpected sensorimotor delays," 2021, published in eLife
  • "Cortical potentials time-locked to discrete postural events during quiet standing are facilitated during postural threat exposure," 2023, published in The Journal of Physiology
  • "Synthetic data in generalizable, learning-based neuroimaging," 2024, published in Imaging Neuroscience
  • "Facilitation and Habituation of Cortical and Subcortical Control of Standing Balance Following Repeated Exposure to a Height-related Postural Threat," 2022, published in Neuroscience
  • "Assessing and defining explicit processes in visuomotor adaptation," 2021, published in Experimental Brain Research

The scientist collaborates frequently with a core group of co-authors, which include J. Timothy Inglis, Mark G. Carpenter, Hyosub E. Kim, Gregg Eschelmuller, and Ryan M. Peters.

Romeo Chua tends to publish in venues that focus on experimental brain research, neurophysiology, motor behavior, and neuroscience communication, with recurrent publications appearing in:

  • Experimental Brain Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Journal of Motor Behavior
  • Neuroscience Letters

Across their career, Romeo Chua has contributed extensively to the understanding of postural control, sensorimotor adaptation, and neuroimaging techniques as they relate to balance and motor function. Their work integrates interdisciplinary approaches involving engineering, rehabilitation, and cognitive neuroscience, reflecting in their varied subfield interests and publication topics.

Best Publications

  • A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming.

    Digby Elliott;Werner F. Helsen;Romeo Chua

  • Visual regulation of manual aiming

    Romeo Chua;Digby Elliott

  • Discrete vs. continuous visual control of manual aiming

    Digby Elliott;Richard G. Garson;David Goodman;Romeo Chua

  • Can prepared responses be stored subcortically

    Anthony N. Carlsen;Romeo Chua;J. Timothy Inglis;David J. Sanderson

  • Eye-hand coordination in goal-directed aiming.

    Gordon Binsted;Romeo Chua;Werner Helsen;Digby Elliott

  • Prepared movements are elicited early by startle.

    Anthony N. Carlsen;Romeo Chua;J. Timothy Inglis;David J. Sanderson

  • Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data.

    Michael A. Khan;Ian M. Franks;Digby Elliott;Gavin P. Lawrence

  • Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: kinematic evidence.

    Michael A Khan;Digby Elliot;Jamie Coull;Romeo Chua

  • The influence of postural threat on the cortical response to unpredictable and predictable postural perturbations

    Allan L. Adkin;Adam D. Campbell;Romeo Chua;Mark G. Carpenter

  • Asymmetries in the regulation of visually guided aiming.

    Richard G. Carson;David Goodman;Romeo Chua;Digby Elliott

  • Possible contributions of CPG activity to the control of rhythmic human arm movement.

    E Paul Zehr;Timothy J Carroll;Romeo Chua;David F Collins

  • Sex differences in exercise-induced diaphragmatic fatigue in endurance-trained athletes

    Jordan A. Guenette;Lee M. Romer;Jordan S. Querido;Romeo Chua

  • Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.

    Anthony N. Carlsen;Chris J. Dakin;Romeo Chua;Ian M. Franks

  • Asymmetries in Coupling Dynamics of Perception and Action.

    W. D. Byblow;R. Chua;D. Goodman

  • Human interlimb reflexes evoked by electrical stimulation of cutaneous nerves innervating the hand and foot.

    Paul E. Zehr;David F. Collins;Romeo Chua

  • The contribution of vision to asymmetries in manual aiming

    Richard G. Carson;Romeo Chua;Digby Elliott;David Goodman

  • Touch Noise Increases Vibrotactile Sensitivity in Old and Young

    Cari Wells;Lawrence M. Ward;R. Chua;J. Timothy Inglis

  • Considerations for the use of a startling acoustic stimulus in studies of motor preparation in humans

    Anthony N. Carlsen;Dana Maslovat;Melanie Y. Lam;Romeo Chua

  • The role of cutaneous receptors in the foot.

    J. Timothy Inglis;Paul M. Kennedy;Cari Wells;Romeo Chua

  • Asymmetries in the Preparation and Control of Manual Aiming Movements

    Digby Elliott;Eric A. Roy;David Goodman;Richard G. Carson

  • On-line control of rapid aiming movements: Unexpected target perturbations and movement kinematics.

    Matthew Heath;Nicola J. Hodges;Romeo Chua;Digby Elliott

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian M. Franks
Ian M. Franks University of British Columbia
Digby Elliott
Digby Elliott McMaster University
J. Timothy Inglis
J. Timothy Inglis University of British Columbia
Mark G. Carpenter
Mark G. Carpenter University of British Columbia
Nicola J. Hodges
Nicola J. Hodges University of British Columbia
Richard G. Carson
Richard G. Carson Trinity College Dublin
James T. Enns
James T. Enns University of British Columbia
Alan Kingstone
Alan Kingstone University of British Columbia
Winston D. Byblow
Winston D. Byblow University of Auckland
Eric A. Roy
Eric A. Roy University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens doors to a variety of allied fields and professional pathways, particularly in mental health, research, and social services. Many students consider related disciplines like psychology, counseling, or social work to broaden their knowledge and career prospects.

If you are interested in therapy or family support, options such as mft programs can lead to roles as Marriage and Family Therapists. For those seeking a more flexible degree in mental health, an affordable online psychology masters can help deepen your psychological expertise while keeping costs manageable.

Cost is a key consideration when choosing a degree. Researching the psychology degree cost can help you find programs that fit your budget while still providing quality education and career advancement opportunities.

For those interested in social work, there are numerous easiest online msw program options available, enabling you to make a direct impact in your community. Each of these pathways complements a foundation in Neuroscience and can lead to rewarding careers across multiple sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Romeo Chua

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles