World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
9185
World Ranking
4591
National Ranking
266

J. Timothy Inglis publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Timothy Inglis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 142 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

J. Timothy Inglis D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Timothy Inglis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Timothy Inglis is a researcher affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada, with a focus on neuroscience, health professions, and medicine. Their research prominently investigates areas such as motor control and adaptation, balance, gait and falls prevention, and muscle activation through electromyography studies.

Their recent publications reflect a concentration on the neural and physiological mechanisms underlying standing balance and postural control, often in the context of sensorimotor challenges. Notable papers include:

  • "Learning to stand with unexpected sensorimotor delays" (2021, eLife)
  • "Cortical potentials time-locked to discrete postural events during quiet standing are facilitated during postural threat exposure" (2023, The Journal of Physiology)
  • "Influence of age on the frequency characteristics of the soleus muscle response to Achilles tendon vibration during standing" (2020, The Journal of Physiology)
  • "Facilitation and Habituation of Cortical and Subcortical Control of Standing Balance Following Repeated Exposure to a Height-related Postural Threat" (2022, Neuroscience)
  • "Brain connectivity during simulated balance in older adults with and without Parkinson's disease" (2021, NeuroImage Clinical)

Key research topics explored by Inglis include:

  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Effects of Vibration on Health
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Inglis's work has been published frequently in several scientific venues, with notable appearances in:

  • The Journal of Physiology
  • Experimental Brain Research
  • Neuroscience Letters
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife

The scientist collaborates regularly with other researchers in related fields. Frequent coauthors include Mark G. Carpenter, Romeo Chua, Gregg Eschelmuller, Ryan M. Peters, and Jean-Sébastien Blouin, reflecting interdisciplinary work in neuroscience and rehabilitation sciences.

Inglis's subfields of study emphasize cognitive neuroscience, physical therapy, sports therapy and rehabilitation, biomedical engineering, orthopedics and sports medicine, and neurology. This interdisciplinary approach supports comprehensive investigations into the neural control of posture and mechanisms that contribute to disturbances in balance.

Best Publications

  • Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole

    Paul M. Kennedy;J. Timothy Inglis

  • Exercise Leads to Faster Postural Reflexes, Improved Balance and Mobility, and Fewer Falls in Older Persons with Chronic Stroke

    Daniel S. Marigold;Janice J. Eng;Andrew S. Dawson;J. Timothy Inglis

  • The importance of somatosensory information in triggering and scaling automatic postural responses in humans

    J. Timothy Inglis;Fay B. Horak;Charlotte L. Shupert;Christine Jones-Rycewicz

  • Shifting the balance: evidence of an exploratory role for postural sway

    M.G. Carpenter;C.D. Murnaghan;J.T. Inglis

  • Can prepared responses be stored subcortically

    Anthony N. Carlsen;Romeo Chua;J. Timothy Inglis;David J. Sanderson

  • Prepared movements are elicited early by startle.

    Anthony N. Carlsen;Romeo Chua;J. Timothy Inglis;David J. Sanderson

  • When is Vestibular Information Important During Walking

    Leah R. Bent;J. Timothy Inglis;Bradford J. McFadyen

  • Effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation on human postural responses during support surface translations

    J. T. Inglis;C. L. Shupert;F. Hlavacka;F. B. Horak

  • Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations

    Gunter P Siegmund;David J Sanderson;Barry S Myers;J Timothy Inglis

  • Frequency response of human vestibular reflexes characterized by stochastic stimuli

    Christopher J. Dakin;Gregory M. Lee Son;J. Timothy Inglis;Jean-Sébastien Blouin

  • Awareness affects the response of human subjects exposed to a single whiplash-like perturbation.

    Gunter P. Siegmund;David J. Sanderson;Barry S. Myers;J. Timothy Inglis

  • Cutaneous afferent innervation of the human foot sole: what can we learn from single-unit recordings?

    Unknown

  • Touch Noise Increases Vibrotactile Sensitivity in Old and Young

    Cari Wells;Lawrence M. Ward;R. Chua;J. Timothy Inglis

  • Adaptations to normal human gait on potentially slippery surfaces: the effects of awareness and prior slip experience.

    Tamika L. Heiden;David J. Sanderson;J. Timothy Inglis;Gunter P. Siegmund

  • Magnitude effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on the trajectory of human gait.

    Leah R Bent;Bradford J McFadyen;Veronique French Merkley;Paul M Kennedy

  • The role of cutaneous receptors in the foot.

    J. Timothy Inglis;Paul M. Kennedy;Cari Wells;Romeo Chua

  • Mental rehearsal of motor tasks recruits α-motoneurones but fails to recruit human fusimotor neurones selectively

    Simon C. Gandevia;Linda R. Wilson;J. Timothy Inglis;David Burke

  • Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements

    Gunter P. Siegmund;J. Timothy Inglis;David J. Sanderson

  • Neural Control of Superficial and Deep Neck Muscles in Humans

    Jean-Sébastien Blouin;Gunter P. Siegmund;Mark G. Carpenter;J. Timothy Inglis

  • Position sensitivity of human muscle spindles: single afferent and population representations.

    Paul J. Cordo;Carmen Flores-Vieira;Carmen Flores-Vieira;Sabine M. P. Verschueren;J. Timothy Inglis

  • Long-term intermittent hypoxia increases sympathetic activity and chemosensitivity during acute hypoxia in humans

    Sarah-Jane C. Lusina;Paul M. Kennedy;J. Timothy Inglis;Donald C. McKenzie;Donald C. McKenzie

  • Regional Variation and Changes With Ageing in Vibrotactile Sensitivity in the Human Footsole

    Cari Wells;Lawrence M. Ward;Romeo Chua;J. Timothy Inglis

Frequent Co-Authors

Romeo Chua
Romeo Chua University of British Columbia
Mark G. Carpenter
Mark G. Carpenter University of British Columbia
Ian M. Franks
Ian M. Franks University of British Columbia
Lawrence M. Ward
Lawrence M. Ward University of British Columbia
Janice J. Eng
Janice J. Eng University of British Columbia
Martin J. McKeown
Martin J. McKeown University of British Columbia
Barry S. Myers
Barry S. Myers Duke University
Andrei V. Krassioukov
Andrei V. Krassioukov University of British Columbia
Laurent J. Bouyer
Laurent J. Bouyer Université Laval

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing J. Timothy Inglis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles