World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Juana Gómez-Benito

Juana Gómez-Benito

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7514 7007 83 82 192 8092

Juana Gómez-Benito publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juana Gómez-Benito between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juana Gómez-Benito published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2010. 22 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2010. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 7 publications
1987 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juana Gómez-Benito: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 2
2003 4
2004 4
2005 4
2006 1
2007 1
2008 3
2009 9
2010 18
2011 16
2012 7
2013 13
2014 12
2015 7
2016 6
2017 16
2018 14
2019 17
2020 11
2021 16
2022 14
2023 9
2024 15
2025 7
Total 231
Download as CSV

Juana Gómez-Benito publications per year - data summary

  • Juana Gómez-Benito, a Psychology scholar from University of Barcelona, has 231 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1987 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 18 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1987, 1993, 1996, 2006 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 11 of the 39 years in the span carry no publications at all (1988, 1989, 1990, 1991 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.3 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 61 publications, 26% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1987-1999: 3 publications (0.2 per year); 2000-2012: 71 publications (5.5 per year); 2013-2025: 157 publications (12.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Juana Gómez-Benito publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juana Gómez-Benito sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 192
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Juana Gómez-Benito publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Juana Gómez-Benito, a Psychology scholar from University of Barcelona, records 192 publications - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Juana Gómez-Benito, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Juana Gómez-Benito ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Juana Gómez-Benito D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juana Gómez-Benito sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Juana Gómez-Benito D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Juana Gómez-Benito, a Psychology scholar from University of Barcelona, records 42 D-Index - the 36th percentile of the discipline.
  • 36% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Juana Gómez-Benito, and about 64% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Juana Gómez-Benito ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Juana Gómez-Benito is affiliated with the University of Barcelona in Spain and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine. With a research focus spanning clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, general health professions, sociology and political science, and social psychology, their work addresses a wide range of topics relevant to mental health and psychosocial development.

The scientist's primary research interests include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental health and patient involvement
  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Cerebral palsy and movement disorders
  • Delphi technique in research
  • Impact of technology on adolescents
  • Maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum

Gómez-Benito has published multiple recent papers covering diverse aspects of mental health, decision-making, and social support:

  • "Consensus in the delphi method: What makes a decision change?" (2020), published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist" (2020), published in Psicothema
  • "A Systematic Review of Executive Function and Information Processing Speed in Major Depression Disorder" (2021), published in Brain Sciences
  • "Is Social Media a New Type of Social Support? Social Media Use in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Study" (2022), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "The Psychological Consequences of COVID-19 and Lockdown in the Spanish Population: An Exploratory Sequential Design" (2020), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Frequent collaboration is a significant aspect of Gómez-Benito's work. Key co-authors include:

  • Maite Barrios
  • Georgina Guilera
  • Emilio Rojo
  • Hernán María Sampietro
  • Susana Ochoa

Their publications appear regularly in specialist venues such as:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Psicothema
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
  • Journal of Pediatric Nursing

Best Publications

  • The prevalence of child sexual abuse in community and student samples: A meta-analysis

    Noemí Pereda;Georgina Guilera;Maria Forns;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • The international epidemiology of child sexual abuse: A continuation of Finkelhor (1994)

    Noemí Pereda;Georgina Guilera;Maria Forns;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • Consensus in the delphi method: What makes a decision change?

    Maite Barrios;Georgina Guilera;Laura Nuño;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist.

    Ana Hernández;María D Hidalgo;Ronald K Hambleton;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait Version: Does It Really Measure Anxiety?

    Arturo Bados;Juana Gómez-Benito;Gemma Balaguer

  • Associations between emotional intelligence, depression and suicide risk in nursing students.

    Amor Aradilla-Herrero;Joaquín Tomás-Sábado;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • Calidad de vida familiar en personas con discapacidad: un análisis comparativo

    Leonor Córdoba-Andrade;Juana Gómez-Benito;Miguel Ángel Verdugo-Alonso

  • Psychometric Properties of the Children's Depression Inventory in Community and Clinical Sample

    Anna Figueras Masip;Juan Antonio Amador-Campos;Juana Gómez-Benito;Victoria del Barrio Gándara

  • Non-normal Distributions Commonly Used in Health, Education, and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review

    Roser Bono;María J. Blanca;Jaume Arnau;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • Construction and Validation of the Death Anxiety Inventory (DAI)

    Joaquín Tomás-Sábado;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • Spanish version of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-S): Psychometric properties of a brief scale for cognitive evaluation in schizophrenia

    Oscar Pino;Georgina Guilera;J. Emilio Rojo;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • Psychometric properties of the Spanish adaptation of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised (SPSI-R).

    Albert Maydeu-Olivares;Antoni Rodrı́guez-Fornells;Juana Gómez-Benito;Thomas J. D'Zurilla

  • Manipulating the Alpha Level Cannot Cure Significance Testing

    David Trafimow;Valentin Amrhein;Valentin Amrhein;Corson N. Areshenkoff;Carlos Barrera-Causil

  • Death Attitudes and Emotional Intelligence in Nursing Students

    Amor Aradilla-Herrero;Joaquín Tomás-Sábado;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version: a validation study in patients with schizophrenia

    Laia Mas-Expósito;Juan Antonio Amador-Campos;Juana Gómez-Benito;Lluís Lalucat-Jo

  • A Systematic Review of Executive Function and Information Processing Speed in Major Depression Disorder.

    Laura Nuño;Juana Gómez-Benito;Viviana R. Carmona;Oscar Pino

  • Psychometric properties of the Spanish form of Templer's Death Anxiety Scale.

    Joaquín Tomás-Sábado;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • Evidence for validity of the brief resilient coping scale in a young Spanish sample.

    Joaquín T. Limonero;Joaquín Tomás-Sábado;Maria José Gómez-Romero;Jorge Maté-Méndez

  • Neurocognitive diagnosis and cut-off scores of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-S).

    Emilio Rojo;Oscar Pino;Georgina Guilera;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • Effects of Ability Scale Purification on the Identification of dif

    María J. Navas-Ara;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • Utility of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in schizophrenia.

    Georgina Guilera;Juana Gómez-Benito;Oscar Pino;J. Emilio Rojo

  • Clinical usefulness of the screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry (SCIP-S) scale in patients with type I bipolar disorder

    Georgina Guilera;Oscar Pino;Juana Gómez-Benito;J Emilio Rojo

Frequent Co-Authors

Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos
Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos University of Valencia
Anabel Martínez-Arán
Anabel Martínez-Arán University of Barcelona
Miguel Bernardo
Miguel Bernardo University of Barcelona
Manuel J. Cuesta
Manuel J. Cuesta Hospital Universitario de Navarra
Benedicto Crespo-Facorro
Benedicto Crespo-Facorro University of Seville
Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek Alexandria University
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Fons J. R. van de Vijver Tilburg University
Rens van de Schoot
Rens van de Schoot Utrecht University
Gunther Meinlschmidt
Gunther Meinlschmidt University Hospital of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to various career options in mental health, counseling, and therapy. While a bachelor’s degree offers foundational knowledge, many positions—such as licensed professional counselor (LPC) roles—require advanced degrees and specific licensure. Career pathways and requirements often depend on state and city regulations. For example, if you’re interested in understanding how to become a licensed therapist in Fresno, you’ll need to meet California’s unique licensure criteria.

Education requirements can also vary in other regions. You can learn more about Garland licensed therapist education requirements or discover how to become a licensed therapist in Gilbert for Arizona-specific guidelines. Another example includes how to become a licensed therapist in Glendale, which outlines a different licensure workflow.

No matter your location, online psychology programs provide flexible learning paths. These accredited degrees prepare you for clinical roles, school counseling, or other mental health careers—while helping you meet all necessary educational and certification requirements for your chosen state.

Best Scientists Citing Juana Gómez-Benito

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles