World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
11801
World Ranking
3156
National Ranking
31

Manuel J. Cuesta publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel J. Cuesta sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 268 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Manuel J. Cuesta D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel J. Cuesta sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Manuel J. Cuesta is affiliated with the Hospital Universitario de Navarra in Spain. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a significant focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health. Their scholarly output includes 187 publications in Medicine and 69 in Psychology.

The subfields of study prominent in their work include Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Philosophy. The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas, with particular emphasis on Schizophrenia research and treatment, Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, and other Mental Health Research Topics. Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Tryptophan and brain disorders, and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development are also among their key topics.

Their recent publications highlight ongoing contributions to the understanding of psychosis and related conditions:

  • Movement disorder and sensorimotor abnormalities in schizophrenia and other psychoses - European consensus on assessment and perspectives, 2020, European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Long-Term Outcomes of First-Admission Psychosis: A Naturalistic 21-Year Follow-Up Study of Symptomatic, Functional and Personal Recovery and Their Baseline Predictors, 2021, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With a First Episode of Psychosis: A Two-Year Longitudinal Follow-up Study, 2022, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Examining Gene-Environment Interactions Using Aggregate Scores in a First-Episode Psychosis Cohort, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Identifying clinical clusters with distinct trajectories in first-episode psychosis through an unsupervised machine learning technique, 2021, European Neuropsychopharmacology

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Miquel Bernardo
  • Ana M. Sánchez-Torres
  • Gisela Mezquida
  • Sílvia Amoretti
  • Ana González-Pinto

A significant portion of their research has been published in specialized journals such as Schizophrenia Research, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychological Medicine, European Psychiatry, and Psychiatry Research. The number of publications in each journal is notable, underscoring a consistent presence in these venues:

  • Schizophrenia Research (19 publications)
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (17 publications)
  • Psychological Medicine (13 publications)
  • European Psychiatry (11 publications)
  • Psychiatry Research (9 publications)

Best Publications

  • Psychometric Properties of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in Schizophrenia

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J. Cuesta

  • Are there more than two syndromes in schizophrenia? A critique of the positive-negative dichotomy.

    V Peralta;J de Leon;M J Cuesta

  • How many and which are the psychopathological dimensions in schizophrenia? Issues influencing their ascertainment.

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J. Cuesta

  • Lack of insight in schizophrenia.

    Manuel J. Cuesta;Victor Peralta

  • Dimensional structure of psychotic symptoms: An item-level analysis of SAPS and SANS symptoms in psychotic disorders.

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J Cuesta

  • Effects of olanzapine and other antipsychotics on cognitive function in chronic schizophrenia: a longitudinal study.

    Manuel J Cuesta;Victor Peralta;Amalia Zarzuela

  • Influence of cannabis abuse on schizophrenic psychopathology

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J. Cuesta

  • New evidence of association between COMT gene and prefrontal neurocognitive function in healthy individuals from sibling pairs discordant for psychosis.

    Araceli Rosa;Víctor Peralta;Manuel J. Cuesta;Amalia Zarzuela

  • Diagnostic significance of Schneider's first-rank symptoms in schizophrenia. Comparative study between schizophrenic and non-schizophrenic psychotic disorders.

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J. Cuesta

  • Lack of insight in mood disorders

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J Cuesta

  • Reappraising insight in psychosis. Multi-scale longitudinal study.

    Manuel J. Cuesta;Victor Peralta;Amalia Zarzuela

  • Cognitive disorders in the positive, negative, and disorganization syndromes of schizophrenia

    Manuel J. Cuesta;Victor Peralta

  • An Empirical Analysis of Latent Structures Underlying Schizophrenic Symptoms: A Four-Syndrome Model

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J. Cuesta;Jose de Leon

  • Motor behavior abnormalities in drug‐naïve patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

    Victor Peralta;Maria S. Campos;Elena García De Jalón;Manuel J. Cuesta

  • Motor Abnormalities: From Neurodevelopmental to Neurodegenerative Through “Functional” (Neuro)Psychiatric Disorders

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J Cuesta

  • Motor features in psychotic disorders. I: Factor structure and clinical correlates

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J Cuesta

  • The Val66Met polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene is associated with risk for psychosis: Evidence from a family-based association study

    Araceli Rosa;Manuel J. Cuesta;Mar Fatjó-Vilas;Víctor Peralta

  • Spanish version of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-S): Psychometric properties of a brief scale for cognitive evaluation in schizophrenia

    Oscar Pino;Georgina Guilera;J. Emilio Rojo;Juana Gómez-Benito

  • Premorbid adjustment and clinical correlates of cognitive impairment in first-episode psychosis. The PEPsCog Study

    Manuel J. Cuesta;Ana M. Sánchez-Torres;Bibiana Cabrera;Miquel Bioque

  • Motor features in psychotic disorders. II. Development of diagnostic criteria for catatonia.

    Victor Peralta;Manuel J Cuesta

  • Clinical usefulness of the screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry (SCIP-S) scale in patients with type I bipolar disorder

    Georgina Guilera;Oscar Pino;Juana Gómez-Benito;J Emilio Rojo

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor Peralta
Victor Peralta Royal College of Psychiatrists
Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Miguel Bernardo
Miguel Bernardo University of Barcelona
Lourdes Fañanás
Lourdes Fañanás University of Barcelona
Ana González-Pinto
Ana González-Pinto University of the Basque Country
Antonio Lobo
Antonio Lobo University of Zaragoza
Josefina Castro-Fornieles
Josefina Castro-Fornieles University of Barcelona
Julio Sanjuan
Julio Sanjuan University of Valencia
Celso Arango
Celso Arango Complutense University of Madrid
Benedicto Crespo-Facorro
Benedicto Crespo-Facorro University of Seville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a degree opens doors to a variety of related online programs that can prepare students for rewarding roles in mental health, social services, and counseling. Many students considering a psychology major may also be interested in expanding their knowledge and career opportunities through social work, one of the most popular pathways for psychology graduates.

Online social work degrees offer flexibility and quality education, especially for those balancing work or family commitments. For students in the Northeast, the best online social work degree programs in the Northeast provide accredited options to fast-track your career. If you are located in Massachusetts, you can explore the best online social work degree programs in Massachusetts with programs designed to meet state licensing requirements.

Similarly, those in New Hampshire can benefit from the top online social work degrees in New Hampshire. For Ohio residents, the best online social work degrees in Ohio feature top-rated curricula and practical fieldwork.

Pursuing these related degrees can lead to careers in clinical social work, school counseling, community outreach, and more—making them strong complements or alternatives for those passionate about helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Manuel J. Cuesta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles