World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
114
Citations
38640
World Ranking
344
National Ranking
217

Paul H. Lysaker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Lysaker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 701 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul H. Lysaker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Lysaker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul H. Lysaker was affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and contributed extensively to research in psychology and medicine, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health. Their work spanned a broad range of topics including schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health and psychiatry, psychotherapy techniques and applications, mental health and patient involvement, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, mental health research topics, as well as counseling, therapy, and family dynamics.

The research output included multiple publications in leading academic journals. Notable recent papers featured:

  • Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy: A Recovery-Oriented Treatment Approach for Psychosis, 2020, Psychology Research and Behavior Management
  • Metacognition, social cognition, and mentalizing in psychosis: are these distinct constructs when it comes to subjective experience or are we just splitting hairs?, 2021, BMC Psychiatry

Other frequently published venues for their work included:

  • Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
  • Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

Lysaker collaborated with several frequent coauthors, reflecting ongoing research partnerships. These included:

  • Courtney N. Wiesepape
  • Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
  • Kyle S. Minor
  • Laura A. Faith
  • Jay A. Hamm

The scientist's research integrated multiple disciplines, with primary fields of study being:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine
  • Arts and Humanities

Within these broader domains, subfields addressed by Lysaker's work included:

  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • General Health Professions
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Selected central topics of Lysaker's research were:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Best Publications

  • Pathways between internalized stigma and outcomes related to recovery in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

    Philip T. Yanos;David Roe;Keith Markus;Paul H. Lysaker

  • Metacognition amidst narratives of self and illness in schizophrenia: associations with neurocognition, symptoms, insight and quality of life.

    P H Lysaker;A Carcione;G Dimaggio;J K Johannesen

  • Toward Understanding the Insight Paradox: Internalized Stigma Moderates the Association Between Insight and Social Functioning, Hope, and Self-esteem Among People with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

    Paul H. Lysaker;David Roe;Philip T. Yanos;Philip T. Yanos

  • Five-component model of schizophrenia: Assessing the factorial invariance of the positive and negative syndrome scale

    Morris D. Bell;Paul H. Lysaker;Joseph L. Beam-Goulet;Robert M. Milstein

  • The Impact of Illness Identity on Recovery from Severe Mental Illness

    Philip T. Yanos;David Roe;Paul H. Lysaker

  • Insight and personal narratives of illness in schizophrenia.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Catherine A. Clements;Cynthia D. Plascak-Hallberg;Stacy J. Knipscheer

  • Interventions targeting mental health self-stigma: A review and comparison.

    Philip T. Yanos;Alicia Lucksted;Amy L. Drapalski;David Roe

  • Clinical significance of neurological soft signs in schizophrenia: Factor analysis of the Neurological Evaluation Scale

    R. Andrew Sewell;Edward B. Perry;Laurence P. Karper;Morris D. Bell

  • Affect recognition in schizophrenia: a function of global impairment or a specific cognitive deficit

    Gary Bryson;Morris Bell;Paul Lysaker

  • The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: Reliability, comparability, and predictive validity.

    Morris Bell;Robert Milstein;Joseph Beam-Goulet;Paul Lysaker

  • Know yourself and you shall know the other... to a certain extent : Multiple paths of influence of self-reflection on mindreading

    Giancarlo Dimaggio;Paul H. Lysaker;Antonino Carcione;Giuseppe Nicolò

  • Stigma, social function and symptoms in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: associations across 6 months

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Louanne W. Davis;Louanne W. Davis;Debbie M. Warman;Amy Strasburger

  • Positive and negative affect recognition in schizophrenia: a comparison with substance abuse and normal control subjects

    Morris Bell;Gary Bryson;Paul Lysaker

  • Narrative Structure in Psychosis Schizophrenia and Disruptions in the Dialogical Self

    Paul Henry Lysaker;John Timothy Lysaker

  • Metacognitive Capacities for Reflection in Schizophrenia: Implications for Developing Treatments

    Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker;Giancarlo Dimaggio

  • Clinical Benefits of Paid Work Activity in Schizophrenia

    Morris D. Bell;Paul H. Lysaker;Robert M. Milstein

  • Narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy: a new group-based treatment for internalized stigma among persons with severe mental illness.

    Philip T. Yanos;David Roe;Paul H. Lysaker

  • Schizophrenia and Alterations in Self-experience: A Comparison of 6 Perspectives

    Paul H. Lysaker;John T. Lysaker;John T. Lysaker

  • Metacognition and schizophrenia: the capacity for self-reflectivity as a predictor for prospective assessments of work performance over six months.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Giancarlo Dimaggio;Antonino Carcione;Michele Procacci

  • Cognitive and clinical predictors of success in vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia

    Jovier D. Evans;Gary R. Bond;Piper S. Meyer;Piper S. Meyer;Hea Won Kim;Hea Won Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Giancarlo Dimaggio
Giancarlo Dimaggio Centro di Terapia Metacognitiva Interpersonale - Rome
Kelly D. Buck
Kelly D. Buck Veterans Health Administration
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon Bar-Ilan University
Kyle S. Minor
Kyle S. Minor Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
David Roe
David Roe University of Haifa
Philip T. Yanos
Philip T. Yanos City University of New York
Gary Bryson
Gary Bryson Yale University
Giampaolo Salvatore
Giampaolo Salvatore University of Foggia
Michelle P. Salyers
Michelle P. Salyers Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to diverse online programs and professional pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Many students choose to work toward becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), a role that requires specific educational and licensure steps unique to each state.

If you plan to practice in Vermont, it’s important to review the lpc licensure requirements in Vermont to ensure your chosen program meets all state criteria. If you are considering Virginia, familiarize yourself with the lpc licensure requirements in Virginia before enrolling in an online program.

Prospective counselors in Washington should be aware of the Washington lpc licensure requirements. Similarly, those looking to work in West Virginia need to understand how to get an lpc license in West Virginia and the specific educational prerequisites.

Online psychology degrees can provide flexibility, but always ensure your curriculum aligns with state standards for licensure. Planning your education with career goals and licensure requirements in mind is key to a successful pathway in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Paul H. Lysaker

Recently Published Articles