World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
128
Citations
67374
World Ranking
183
National Ranking
114

Michael F. Green publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael F. Green sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 567 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael F. Green D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael F. Green sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Michael F. Green is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States.

The researcher's recent publications include:

  • The clinical characterization of the patient with primary psychosis aimed at personalization of management, 2021, World Psychiatry
  • Anticholinergic Medication Burden-Associated Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia, 2021, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • The schizophrenia syndrome, circa 2024: What we know and how that informs its nature, 2023, Schizophrenia Research
  • Online Social Cognition Training in Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Multi-Site Clinical Trial, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Proof of mechanism and target engagement of glutamatergic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia: RCTs of pomaglumetad and TS-134 on ketamine-induced psychotic symptoms and pharmacoBOLD in healthy volunteers, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology

Frequent co-authors in Michael F. Green's research collaborations are:

  • Jonathan K. Wynn
  • Junghee Lee
  • Eric A. Reavis
  • William P. Horan
  • Keith H. Nuechterlein

Michael F. Green's publications are commonly found in the following venues:

  • Schizophrenia Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Psychological Medicine

The main fields of study covered by Michael F. Green's work include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Subfields of particular focus within these disciplines are:

  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Clinical Psychology

The primary topics addressed in Michael F. Green's research are:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Neurocognitive Deficits and Functional Outcome in Schizophrenia: Are We Measuring the “Right Stuff”?

    Michael Foster Green;Robert S. Kern;David L. Braff;Jim Mintz

  • What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia

    Michael Foster Green

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Part 1: Test Selection, Reliability, and Validity

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael F. Green;Robert S. Kern;Lyle E. Baade

  • Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS.

    Michael F. Green;Robert S. Kern;Robert K. Heaton

  • Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia.

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;M Deanna;James M. Gold;Terry E. Goldberg

  • Neurocognitive Effects of Antipsychotic Medications in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia in the CATIE Trial

    Richard S.E. Keefe;Robert M. Bilder;Sonia M. Davis;Philip D. Harvey

  • Social Cognition in Schizophrenia: An NIMH Workshop on Definitions, Assessment, and Research Opportunities

    Michael F. Green;David L. Penn;Richard Bentall;William T. Carpenter;William T. Carpenter

  • Social cognition in schizophrenia

    Michael F. Green;Michael F. Green;William P. Horan;William P. Horan;Junghee Lee;Junghee Lee

  • Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: The NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria

    Michael F. Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein;James M. Gold;M Deanna

  • Cognitive impairment and functional outcome in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

    Michael F. Green

  • Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: "The drift busters."

    Joseph Ventura;Michael Foster Green;Andrew Shaner;Robert P. Liberman

  • Anhedonia in schizophrenia: Distinctions between anticipatory and consummatory pleasure ☆

    David E. Gard;Ann M. Kring;Marja Germans Gard;William P. Horan

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 2: co-norming and standardization.

    Robert S. Kern;Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael F. Green;Lyle E. Baade

  • Training and quality assurance with the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I/P)

    Joseph Ventura;Joseph Ventura;Robert P. Liberman;Robert P. Liberman;Robert P. Liberman;Michael F. Green;Michael F. Green;Michael F. Green;Andrew Shaner;Andrew Shaner;Andrew Shaner

  • Does Risperidone Improve Verbal Working Memory in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia?

    Michael Foster Green;B. D. Marshall;William C. Wirshing;Donna Ames

  • Social Cognition in Schizophrenia: Recommendations from the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia New Approaches Conference

    Michael F Green;Michael F Green;Berend Olivier;Jacqueline N Crawley;David L Penn

  • The Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation Study: Results of the Expert Survey and RAND Panel

    Amy E. Pinkham;David L. Penn;Michael F. Green;Benjamin Buck

  • Biosocial pathways to functional outcome in schizophrenia

    John Brekke;Diane D. Kay;Kimmy S. Lee;Michael F. Green

  • Should Schizophrenia Be Treated as a Neurocognitive Disorder

    Michael Foster Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Baseline Neurocognitive Deficits in the CATIE Schizophrenia Trial

    Richard S.E. Keefe;Robert M. Bilder;Philip D. Harvey;Sonia M. Davis

  • A Summary of the FDA-NIMH-MATRICS Workshop on Clinical Trial Design for Neurocognitive Drugs for Schizophrenia

    Robert W Buchanan;Miriam Davis;Donald Goff;Michael F Green

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith H. Nuechterlein
Keith H. Nuechterlein University of California, Los Angeles
Jonathan K. Wynn
Jonathan K. Wynn University of California, Los Angeles
Junghee Lee
Junghee Lee University of California, Los Angeles
Robert S. Kern
Robert S. Kern University of California, Los Angeles
Jim Mintz
Jim Mintz The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Stephen R. Marder
Stephen R. Marder University of California, Los Angeles
Larry J. Seidman
Larry J. Seidman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
David L. Braff
David L. Braff University of California, San Diego
Gregory A. Light
Gregory A. Light University of California, San Diego
Jeremy M. Silverman
Jeremy M. Silverman Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open the door to many rewarding career options, particularly in the field of social work. Each state has its own educational requirements for those looking to become a social worker, so it’s important to understand the specific degree and licensure criteria in your area.

For example, if you’re interested in working in Oklahoma, you can find out more about the degree needed to be a social worker in Oklahoma. In Oregon, aspiring social workers must meet the Oregon education requirements for social workers, which may vary from other states.

Similarly, understanding the social worker education requirements in Pennsylvania is essential if you plan to practice there. Those considering Rhode Island should be aware of the degree needed to be a social worker in Rhode Island to ensure they meet all certification and training standards.

Many online psychology and social work degrees make it easier to qualify for these career pathways no matter where you live, enabling you to meet state-specific requirements while balancing work or family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Michael F. Green

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles