World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 80 1455 1299 59 57 340 21691
Neuroscience 79 1688 1537 154 148 366 21831

Klaus Willmes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Klaus Willmes between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Klaus Willmes published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2013. 13 of the 415 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2013. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
1980 2025

415 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Klaus Willmes: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 3
1982 2
1983 6
1984 0
1985 6
1986 2
1987 8
1988 6
1989 5
1990 2
1991 10
1992 2
1993 6
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 7
1998 5
1999 6
2000 18
2001 12
2002 9
2003 8
2004 9
2005 10
2006 24
2007 7
2008 13
2009 19
2010 18
2011 14
2012 18
2013 27
2014 19
2015 24
2016 12
2017 9
2018 12
2019 9
2020 9
2021 8
2022 8
2023 3
2024 8
2025 5
Total 415
Download as CSV

Klaus Willmes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Willmes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 340 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 340
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Klaus Willmes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Willmes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120 80
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Klaus Willmes is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology. Their work also covers areas such as statistics and probability, rehabilitation, and epidemiology.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Recent publications by Klaus Willmes encompass several journal articles published between 2020 and 2024. Notable papers include:

  • "Professional mathematicians do not differ from others in the symbolic numerical distance and size effects," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy to Monitor Fluid Status in Heart Failure," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Operationalising treatment success in aphasia rehabilitation," 2022, Aphasiology
  • "The prevalence of apraxia of speech in chronic aphasia after stroke: A bayesian hierarchical analysis," 2022, Cortex
  • "Don't SNARC me now! Intraindividual variability of cognitive phenomena - Insights from the Ironman paradigm," 2024, Cognition

Klaus Willmes frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Aphasiology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Cortex
  • Journal of Neurology
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

The researcher collaborates often with several co-authors, including:

  • Ferdinand Binkofski
  • Walter Huber
  • Stefanie Bruehl
  • Iring Koch
  • Hans-Christoph Nuerk

Best Publications

  • Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke

    Dorothee Saur;Rüdiger Lange;Annette Baumgaertner;Valeska Schraknepper

  • On the Functional Neuroanatomy of Intrinsic and Phasic Alertness

    Walter Sturm;Klaus Willmes

  • Evidence of abnormal amygdala functioning in borderline personality disorder: a functional MRI study

    Sabine C Herpertz;Thomas M Dietrich;Britta Wenning;Timo Krings

  • On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect

    Guilherme Wood;Klaus Willmes;Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Martin H. Fischer

  • Functional anatomy of intrinsic alertness: evidence for a fronto-parietal-thalamic-brainstem network in the right hemisphere

    W Sturm;A de Simone;B J Krause;K Specht

  • Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins.

    Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Ulrich Weger;Klaus Willmes

  • Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting

    Caterina Breitenstein;Tanja Grewe;Agnes Flöel;Wolfram Ziegler

  • Cortical activation patterns during complex motor tasks in piano players and control subjects. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Timo Krings;Rudolf Töpper;Henrik Foltys;Stephan Erberich

  • Math Anxiety and Math Ability in Early Primary School Years

    Helga Krinzinger;Liane Kaufmann;Klaus Willmes

  • The universal SNARC effect: the association between number magnitude and space is amodal.

    Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Guilherme Wood;Klaus Willmes

  • Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect.

    Hans–Christoph Nuerk;Wiebke Iversen;Klaus Willmes

  • Embodied numerosity: Implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures

    Frank Domahs;Korbinian Moeller;Stefan Huber;Klaus Willmes

  • Do Specific Attention Deficits Need Specific Training

    Walter Sturm;Klaus Willmes;Bernt Orgass;Wolfgang Hartje

  • Effects of blood estrogen level on cortical activation patterns during cognitive activation as measured by functional MRI.

    T. Dietrich;T. Krings;J. Neulen;K. Willmes

  • Regional cerebral blood flow patterns in visual imagery.

    Georg Goldenberg;Ivo Podreka;Margarete Steiner;Klaus Willmes

  • Detection of intracranial aneurysms with multislice CT: comparison with conventional angiography.

    S. Dammert;T. Krings;W. Moller-Hartmann;E. Ueffing

  • Mental fatigue and temporal preparation in simple reaction-time performance.

    Robert Langner;Michael B. Steinborn;Anjan Chatterjee;Walter Sturm

  • The case of aphasia or neglect after striatocapsular infarction

    C Weiller;K Willmes;W Reiche;A Thron

  • Subjective experience in brain-injured patients and their close relatives : A European Brain Injury Questionnaire study

    Thomas W. Teasdale;Anne-Lise Christensen;Klaus Willmes;Gérard Deloche

  • Functional MRI for presurgical planning: problems, artefacts, and solution strategies.

    T Krings;M H T Reinges;S Erberich;S Kemeny

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Hans-Christoph Nuerk University of Tübingen
Walter Huber
Walter Huber RWTH Aachen University
Korbinian Moeller
Korbinian Moeller University of Tübingen
Timo Krings
Timo Krings University Health Network
Susanne Weis
Susanne Weis Forschungszentrum Jülich
Guilherme Wood
Guilherme Wood University of Graz
Karsten Specht
Karsten Specht University of Bergen
Kerstin Konrad
Kerstin Konrad RWTH Aachen University
Liane Kaufmann
Liane Kaufmann Health Science University
Martin H. Fischer
Martin H. Fischer University of Potsdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens a variety of online pathways, allowing students to tailor their studies to different specializations and career goals. Many choose to advance their education to become licensed therapists, a process with steps that can differ depending on your location and target profession. For example, those interested in how to become a licensed therapist in Louisville must meet specific state requirements regarding education, supervised experience, and licensing exams.

Similarly, if you are considering becoming a licensed therapist in Lubbock, it’s important to be aware of Texas' unique licensure rules and continuing education mandates. Students who plan to practice in Wisconsin should review the Madison licensed therapist education requirements to ensure they fulfill all prerequisites for becoming an LPC.

In addition, understanding the pathway for becoming a licensed therapist in Memphis can help you plan for the necessary steps in Tennessee, from accredited coursework to collecting supervised hours. Exploring these different routes can help you choose the right online psychology degree and prepare for varied and rewarding career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Willmes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles