World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jens Cosedis Nielsen

Jens Cosedis Nielsen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 14801 13932 163 155 430 91287

Jens Cosedis Nielsen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jens Cosedis Nielsen between 1965 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jens Cosedis Nielsen published across 61 years, from 1965 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2022. 46 of the 560 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2022. 1965: 2 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 3 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 43 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 49 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 12 publications
1965 2025

560 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jens Cosedis Nielsen: publications per year, 1965 to 2025
Year Publications
1965 2
1966 1
1967 0
1968 3
1969 2
1970 3
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 2
1975 0
1976 0
1977 3
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 3
1992 4
1993 1
1994 3
1995 0
1996 1
1997 5
1998 8
1999 6
2000 6
2001 1
2002 3
2003 6
2004 6
2005 14
2006 6
2007 5
2008 12
2009 9
2010 4
2011 10
2012 14
2013 14
2014 22
2015 27
2016 31
2017 31
2018 43
2019 35
2020 29
2021 41
2022 49
2023 36
2024 34
2025 12
Total 560
Download as CSV

Jens Cosedis Nielsen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Cosedis Nielsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 430 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 430
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jens Cosedis Nielsen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Cosedis Nielsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jens Cosedis Nielsen is affiliated with Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark and has a substantial body of research primarily in medicine, with a focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including surgery, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and neurology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac arrhythmias and treatments
  • Atrial fibrillation management and outcomes
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Heart failure treatment and management
  • Cardiovascular function and risk factors
  • Cardiac structural anomalies and repair

Jens Cosedis Nielsen has published extensively in various reputable journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • European Heart Journal
  • EP Europace
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Jens Cosedis Nielsen are:

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes, 2023, European Heart Journal
  • 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension, 2022, European Heart Journal

Throughout their career, Jens Cosedis Nielsen has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, most notably:

  • Mads Brix Kronborg
  • Jens Brock Johansen
  • Lars Køber
  • Sam Riahi
  • Jens Haarbo

Best Publications

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.

    Theresa A McDonagh;Marco Metra;Marianna Adamo;Roy S Gardner

  • 2017 HRS / EHRA / ECAS / APHRS / SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

    Hugh Calkins;Gerhard Hindricks;Riccardo Cappato;Young Hoon Kim

  • 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy : The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michele Brignole;Angelo Auricchio;Gonzalo Baron-Esquivias;Pierre Bordachar

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

    Frank L J Visseren;François Mach;Yvo M Smulders;David Carballo

  • 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.

    Alec Vahanian;Friedhelm Beyersdorf;Fabien Praz;Milan Milojevic

  • Defibrillator Implantation in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure

    Lars Køber;Jens J. Thune;Jens J. Thune;Jens C. Nielsen;Jens C. Nielsen;Jens Haarbo;Jens Haarbo

  • HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Arrhythmias Associated With Cardiac Sarcoidosis

    David H. Birnie;William H. Sauer;Frank Bogun;Joshua M. Cooper

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapyDeveloped by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michael Glikson;Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Mads Brix Kronborg;Yoav Michowitz

  • Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome

    Henning Rud Andersen;Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Poul Erik Bloch Thomsen;Leif Thuesen

  • Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark.

    Rikke Esberg Kirkfeldt;Jens Brock Johansen;Ellen Aagaard Nohr;Ole Dan Jørgensen

  • Radiofrequency Ablation as Initial Therapy in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

    Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Arne Johannessen;Pekka Raatikainen;Gerhard Hindricks

  • A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome.

    Jens C Nielsen;Lene Kristensen;Henning R Andersen;Peter T Mortensen

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

    Michael Glikson;Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Mads Brix Kronborg;Yoav Michowitz

  • 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary

    Hugh Calkins;Gerhard Hindricks;Riccardo Cappato;Young Hoon Kim

  • 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.

    Alec Vahanian;Friedhelm Beyersdorf;Fabien Praz;Milan Milojevic

  • Infection after pacemaker implantation: infection rates and risk factors associated with infection in a population-based cohort study of 46299 consecutive patients.

    Jens Brock Johansen;Ole Dan Jørgensen;Mogens Møller;Per Arnsbo

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

    Frank L J Visseren;François Mach;Yvo M Smulders;David Carballo

  • 2018 EHRA expert consensus statement on lead extraction: recommendations on definitions, endpoints, research trial design, and data collection requirements for clinical scientific studies and registries: endorsed by APHRS/HRS/LAHRS.

    Maria G Bongiorni;Haran Burri;Jean C Deharo;Christoph Starck

  • A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome

    Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Poul Erik B. Thomsen;Søren Højberg;Mogens Møller

  • A Decade of Information on the Use of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Interventional Electrophysiological Procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2017 Report from the European Heart Rhythm Association.

    M.J. Pekka Raatikainen;David O. Arnar;Bela Merkely;Jens Cosedis Nielsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerhard Hindricks
Gerhard Hindricks Leipzig University
Susanne S. Pedersen
Susanne S. Pedersen University of Southern Denmark
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Gregory Y.H. Lip University of Liverpool
Jesper Hastrup Svendsen
Jesper Hastrup Svendsen Copenhagen University Hospital
Giuseppe Boriani
Giuseppe Boriani University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Gunnar H. Gislason
Gunnar H. Gislason Copenhagen University Hospital
Lars Køber
Lars Køber Copenhagen University Hospital
Christian Torp-Pedersen
Christian Torp-Pedersen Aalborg University
Isabelle C. Van Gelder
Isabelle C. Van Gelder University Medical Center Groningen
Paulus Kirchhof
Paulus Kirchhof University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA offers more pathways than ever, thanks to a wide array of online healthcare degrees. For those interested in healthcare leadership, online MHA programs CAHME accredited ensure a strong foundation in administration and are valued for their rigorous accreditation standards.

Nursing professionals may benefit from flexible degree options. Programs like an RN to BSN online with no clinicals can streamline learning for working nurses, making it easier to advance credentials remotely without additional clinical requirements.

For advanced practice nurses wanting to quickly move up, choosing the shortest MSN to DNP program can significantly reduce study time, helping students reach the highest nursing credentials faster. Similarly, finding the shortest DNP program can simplify the path for experienced clinicians seeking leadership or academic roles.

These flexible online options allow students and professionals to continue advancing their healthcare careers while balancing work and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Cosedis Nielsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles