World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
91677
World Ranking
15828
National Ranking
292

Cecilia Linde publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecilia Linde sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 357 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Cecilia Linde D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecilia Linde sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cecilia Linde is affiliated with Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden and has a significant body of research primarily in the field of medicine, with a strong focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their scholarly output includes contributions to subfields such as cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and hematology.

Their work spans several key topics related to cardiovascular health and treatment, including:

  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac arrhythmias and treatments
  • Heart failure treatment and management
  • Cardiovascular function and risk factors
  • Atrial fibrillation management and outcomes
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiac structural anomalies and repair

Frequent co-authors in Cecilia Linde's research include Lars H. Lund, Gianluigi Savarese, Camilla Hage, Michael R. Gold, and Valentina Kutyifa. This collaboration network reflects active engagement with researchers specializing in cardiovascular disease and therapy.

Their research has been published extensively in several prominent venues, including:

  • European Heart Journal
  • EP Europace
  • European Journal of Heart Failure
  • ESC Heart Failure
  • Heart Rhythm

Notable recent publications feature important contributions to guidelines and clinical consensus statements in cardiology. Selected recent papers include:

  • Corrigendum to: 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, 2021, PubMed
  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy, 2021, EP Europace
  • Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care, 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement, 2024, European Heart Journal

Best Publications

  • 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure

    Piotr Ponikowski;Adriaan A Voors;Stefan D Anker;Héctor Bueno

  • 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

    Piotr Ponikowski;Adriaan A. Voors;Stefan D. Anker;Héctor Bueno

  • Effects of Multisite Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Intraventricular Conduction Delay

    S Cazeau;C Leclercq;T Lavergne;S Walker

  • 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy : The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michele Brignole;Angelo Auricchio;Gonzalo Baron-Esquivias;Pierre Bordachar

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Karl Swedberg;John Cleland;Henry Dargie;Helmut Drexler

  • Randomized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization in Mildly Symptomatic Heart Failure Patients and in Asymptomatic Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Previous Heart Failure Symptoms

    Cecilia Linde;William T. Abraham;Michael R. Gold;Martin St. John Sutton

  • Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study

    Cecilia Linde;Christophe Leclercq;Steve Rex;Stephane Garrigue

  • Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association.

    Panos E. Vardas;Angelo Auricchio;Jean-Jacques Blanc;Jean-Claude Daubert

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapyDeveloped by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michael Glikson;Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Mads Brix Kronborg;Yoav Michowitz

  • 2010 focused update of ESC Guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: an update of the 2008 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC Guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy. Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association.

    Kenneth Dickstein;Panos E. Vardas;Angelo Auricchio;Jean-Claude Daubert

  • Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy

    Panos E Vardas;Angelo Auricchio;Jean-Jacques Blanc;Jean-Claude Daubert

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Part 2--issues during and after device implantation and unresolved questions.

    Jeroen J. Bax;Theodore Abraham;S. Serge Barold;Ole A. Breithardt

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Part 1--issues before device implantation.

    Jeroen J. Bax;Theodore Abraham;S. Serge Barold;Ole A. Breithardt

  • Comparative effects of permanent biventricular and right-univentricular pacing in heart failure patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

    C. Leclercq;S. Walker;C. Linde;J. Clementy

  • An individual patient meta-analysis of five randomized trials assessing the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure.

    John G. Cleland;William T. Abraham;Cecilia Linde;Michael R. Gold

  • Ongoing right ventricular hemodynamics in heart failure: clinical value of measurements derived from an implantable monitoring system.

    Philip B Adamson;Anthony Magalski;Frieder Braunschweig;Michael Böhm

  • Prevention of disease progression by cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: insights from the European cohort of the REVERSE (Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction) trial.

    Claude Daubert;Michael R. Gold;William T. Abraham;Stefano Ghio

  • 2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure : implant and follow-up recommendations and management

    Jean-Claude Daubert;Leslie Saxon;Philip B. Adamson;Angelo Auricchio

  • Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association.

    Panos E. Vardas;Angelo Auricchio;Jean-Jacques Blanc;Jean-Claude Daubert

  • Pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

    L. Kappenberger;C. Linde;C. Daubert;W. McKenna

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth Dickstein
Kenneth Dickstein University of Bergen
Michael R. Gold
Michael R. Gold Medical University of South Carolina
William T. Abraham
William T. Abraham The Ohio State University
Angelo Auricchio
Angelo Auricchio Universita della Svizzera Italiana
John G.F. Cleland
John G.F. Cleland University of Glasgow
Panos E. Vardas
Panos E. Vardas University of Crete
Silvia G. Priori
Silvia G. Priori University of Pavia
Piotr Ponikowski
Piotr Ponikowski Wrocław Medical University
Gerasimos Filippatos
Gerasimos Filippatos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Giuseppe Boriani
Giuseppe Boriani University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine is only one of many fulfilling and in-demand career paths in the healthcare industry. For students considering alternative or complementary qualifications, numerous affordable online programs can open doors to fast-growing fields within healthcare.

If you are interested in data management and technology within healthcare settings, healthcare informatics degree programs offer essential skills in organizing and safeguarding medical data. Those who prefer administrative and back-office roles can build specialized skills with billing and coding classes online, which are critical for the processing of healthcare claims.

For those aspiring to provide direct patient care, there are also flexible and affordable nursing pathways. Explore the cheapest np school options if you wish to become a Nurse Practitioner, or review highly accessible nursing school online programs for becoming a Registered Nurse.

These online degrees offer convenience, cost savings, and the skills needed for rewarding allied health careers—all while fitting around your current commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Cecilia Linde

Trending Scientists