World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
32367
World Ranking
15430
National Ranking
7783

Michael R. Gold publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Gold sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 566 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael R. Gold D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Gold sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael R. Gold is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their work covers numerous subfields and topics, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Major topics explored in their research include:

  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management

The scientist has published extensively in several leading journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • EP Europace
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Michael R. Gold include:

  • Primary Results From the Understanding Outcomes With the S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients With Low Ejection Fraction (UNTOUCHED) Trial, 2020, Circulation
  • 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure, 2023, Heart Rhythm
  • Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Comparison of Left Bundle Branch and His Bundle Pacing in Bradycardia Patients, 2020, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Cecilia Linde
  • Jeff S. Healey
  • William F. McIntyre
  • Valentina Kutyifa
  • Mikhael F. El-Chami

Best Publications

  • Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of Stroke

    Jeff S. Healey;Stuart J. Connolly;Michael R. Gold;Carsten W. Israel

  • Randomized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization in Mildly Symptomatic Heart Failure Patients and in Asymptomatic Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Previous Heart Failure Symptoms

    Cecilia Linde;William T. Abraham;Michael R. Gold;Martin St. John Sutton

  • Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)

    Wojciech Zareba;Helmut Klein;Iwona Cygankiewicz;W. Jackson Hall

  • 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society

    Fred M. Kusumoto;Mark H. Schoenfeld;Coletta Barrett;James R. Edgerton

  • Temporal Relationship Between Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and Embolic Events

    Michela Brambatti;Stuart J. Connolly;Michael R. Gold;Carlos A. Morillo

  • Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at risk for sudden death

    A E Buxton;K L Lee;L DiCarlo;M R Gold

  • An individual patient meta-analysis of five randomized trials assessing the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure.

    John G. Cleland;William T. Abraham;Cecilia Linde;Michael R. Gold

  • Safety and Efficacy of a Totally Subcutaneous Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator

    Raul Weiss;Bradley P. Knight;Michael R. Gold;Angel R. Leon

  • Primary Results From the SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (SMART-AV) Trial A Randomized Trial Comparing Empirical, Echocardiography-Guided, and Algorithmic Atrioventricular Delay Programming in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

    Kenneth A. Ellenbogen;Michael R. Gold;Timothy E. Meyer;Ignacio Fernández Lozano

  • Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT

    Isabelle C. Van Gelder;Jeff S. Healey;Harry J. G. M. Crijns;Jia Wang

  • Safety and efficacy of the totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: 2-year results from a pooled analysis of the IDE study and EFFORTLESS registry

    Martin C. Burke;Michael R. Gold;Bradley P. Knight;Craig S. Barr

  • Limitations of ejection fraction for prediction of sudden death risk in patients with coronary artery disease. Lessons from the MUSTT study

    Alfred E. Buxton;Kerry L. Lee;Gail E. Hafley;Luis A. Pires

  • Prevention of disease progression by cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: insights from the European cohort of the REVERSE (Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction) trial.

    Claude Daubert;Michael R. Gold;William T. Abraham;Stefano Ghio

  • Electrical Storm Presages Nonsudden Death The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial

    Derek V. Exner;Sergio L. Pinski;D. George Wyse;Ellen Graham Renfroe

  • The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the Perioperative Management of Patients with Implantable Defibrillators, Pacemakers and Arrhythmia Monitors: Facilities and Patient Management This document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)

    George H. Crossley;Jeanne E. Poole;Marc A. Rozner;Samuel J. Asirvatham

  • Effect of QRS duration and morphology on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in mild heart failure: results from the Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study.

    Michael R. Gold;Christophe Thébault;Cecilia Linde;William T. Abraham

  • The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy

    Michael R. Gold;Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green;Jagmeet P. Singh;Kenneth A. Ellenbogen

  • A comparison of T-wave alternans, signal averaged electrocardiography and programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk stratification

    Michael R Gold;Daniel M Bloomfield;Kelley P Anderson;Nabil E El-Sherif

  • Dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular delay in congestive heart failure: a randomized study.

    Michael R. Gold;Zenaida Feliciano;Stephen S. Gottlieb;Michael L. Fisher

  • 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay

    Fred M. Kusumoto;Mark H. Schoenfeld;Coletta Barrett;James R. Edgerton

Frequent Co-Authors

Cecilia Linde
Cecilia Linde Karolinska University Hospital
William T. Abraham
William T. Abraham The Ohio State University
Jeff S. Healey
Jeff S. Healey Population Health Research Institute
Stuart J. Connolly
Stuart J. Connolly McMaster University
Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
Kenneth A. Ellenbogen Virginia Commonwealth University
Kerry L. Lee
Kerry L. Lee Duke University
Carlos A. Morillo
Carlos A. Morillo University of Calgary
Stefan H. Hohnloser
Stefan H. Hohnloser Goethe University Frankfurt
Bradley P. Knight
Bradley P. Knight Northwestern University
Francis G. Spinale
Francis G. Spinale University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to many rewarding healthcare careers. Alongside traditional MD programs, there are flexible online options for those seeking alternative paths in healthcare.

For students interested in the intersection of healthcare and technology, a bachelor of health information management online equips graduates to manage patient data and health records—a growing field as electronic health systems expand.

Those looking for quick entry into healthcare might consider enrolling in the cheapest medical coding certification online. Medical billing and coding professionals play a vital role in managing insurance claims and processing essential data for healthcare facilities.

Aspiring nurses have numerous affordable choices, including the cheapest fnp programs for those wanting to become Family Nurse Practitioners, and comprehensive cheapest online nursing programs that prepare students for frontline patient care.

These online degree and certification programs offer flexible, cost-effective alternatives to traditional pathways, making it easier to begin or advance a healthcare career from anywhere in the US.

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. Gold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles