World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
21836
World Ranking
19095
National Ranking
9519

Bradley P. Knight publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley P. Knight sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 424 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bradley P. Knight D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley P. Knight sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradley P. Knight is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research is primarily focused within the field of Medicine, with a significant portion dedicated to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their main areas of study encompass key topics including:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Bradley P. Knight has contributed frequently to several publication venues throughout their career. The most common venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Their recent papers illustrate a diverse range of collaborative work and research interests across bioengineering and clinical cardiology. Selected recent publications are:

  • Fully implantable and bioresorbable cardiac pacemakers without leads or batteries, 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • A transient, closed-loop network of wireless, body-integrated devices for autonomous electrotherapy, 2022, Science
  • Predictors of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Primary Results From the Understanding Outcomes With the S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients With Low Ejection Fraction (UNTOUCHED) Trial, 2020, Circulation
  • Efficacy and Safety of an Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine

Collaborations have been an important aspect of their research output. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Rod Passman
  • Anna Pfenniger
  • Rishi Arora
  • Graham Peigh
  • Alexandru B. Chicos

Best Publications

  • Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

    Hakan Oral;Bradley P. Knight;Hiroshi Tada;Mehmet Özaydın

  • Update on Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infections and Their Management A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Larry M. Baddour;Andrew E. Epstein;Christopher C. Erickson;Bradley P. Knight

  • American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society scientific statement on noninvasive risk stratification techniques for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention.

    Jeffrey J. Goldberger;Michael E. Cain;Stefan H. Hohnloser;Alan H. Kadish

  • Safety and Efficacy of a Totally Subcutaneous Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator

    Raul Weiss;Bradley P. Knight;Michael R. Gold;Angel R. Leon

  • Safety and efficacy of the totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: 2-year results from a pooled analysis of the IDE study and EFFORTLESS registry

    Martin C. Burke;Michael R. Gold;Bradley P. Knight;Craig S. Barr

  • Clinical significance of early recurrences of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation

    Hakan Oral;Bradley P Knight;Mehmet Özaydın;Hiroshi Tada

  • EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias

    Christian Torp Pedersen;G. Neal Kay;Jonathan Kalman;Martin Borggrefe

  • Facilitating transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with ibutilide pretreatment.

    H Oral;J J Souza;G F Michaud;B P Knight

  • AHA/ACCF Scientific Statement on the Evaluation of Syncope: From the American Heart Association Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Cardiovascular Nursing, Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and Stroke, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group; and the American College of Cardiology Foundation In Collaboration With the Heart Rhythm Society

    S. Adam Strickberger;D. Woodrow Benson;Italo Biaggioni;David J. Callans

  • Effect of an irregular ventricular rhythm on cardiac output

    Emile G. Daoud;Raul Weiss;Marwan Bahu;Bradley P. Knight

  • Diagnostic value of tachycardia features and pacing maneuvers during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

    Bradley P Knight;Matthew Ebinger;Hakan Oral;Michael H Kim

  • Effect of verapamil and procainamide on atrial fibrillation-induced electrical remodeling in humans.

    Emile G. Daoud;Bradley P. Knight;Raul Weiss;Marwan Bahu

  • Segmental Ostial Ablation to Isolate the Pulmonary Veins During Atrial Fibrillation: Feasibility and Mechanistic Insights

    Hakan Oral;Bradley P. Knight;Mehmet Özaydın;Aman Chugh

  • ACC/AHA clinical competence statement on electrocardiography and ambulatory electrocardiography. A report of the ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM Task Force on Clinical Competence (ACC/AHA Committee to Develop a Clinical Competence Statement on Electrocardiography and Ambulatory Electrocardiography).

    Alan H. Kadish;Alfred E. Buxton;Harold L. Kennedy;Bradley P. Knight

  • EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias

    Hannah Peachey;Christian Torp Pedersen;G. Neal Kay;Jonathan Kalman

  • A technique for the rapid diagnosis of atrial tachycardia in the electrophysiology laboratory.

    Bradley P Knight;Adam Zivin;Joseph Souza;Matthew Flemming

  • Outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope treated with an implantable defibrillator

    Bradley P Knight;Rajiva Goyal;Frank Pelosi;Matthew Flemming

  • Early safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage suture ligation: results from the U.S. transcatheter LAA ligation consortium.

    Matthew J. Price;Douglas N. Gibson;Steven J. Yakubov;Jason C. Schultz

  • Differentiation of atypical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia using a septal accessory pathway by the response to ventricular pacing.

    Gregory F Michaud;Hiroshi Tada;Steven Chough;Robert Baker

  • EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias

    Christian Torp Pedersen;G. Neal Kay;Jonathan Kalman;Martin Borggrefe

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Morady
Fred Morady University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Frank Pelosi
Frank Pelosi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hakan Oral
Hakan Oral University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrea Natale
Andrea Natale Case Western Reserve University
Jeffrey J. Goldberger
Jeffrey J. Goldberger University of Miami
Robert S. Rosenson
Robert S. Rosenson Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Joseph A. Hill
Joseph A. Hill The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Paolo G. Camici
Paolo G. Camici Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Anna F. Dominiczak
Anna F. Dominiczak University of Glasgow
Kiran Musunuru
Kiran Musunuru University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens various online educational opportunities beyond the traditional MD route. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, consider healthcare administration degrees, which prepare students for leadership and management roles in medical settings.

If direct patient care appeals to you, nursing is a flexible option. There are now many nursing programs without teas or HESI exam requirements, making entry into the field more accessible. Licensed registered nurses can also advance their careers with rn to np bridge programs, offering a streamlined path toward becoming a nurse practitioner.

Those interested in supportive roles will find the best medical billing and coding schools online provide essential training for working in healthcare documentation and insurance. Each of these pathways offers flexible, accredited programs designed to help you enter or advance within the fast-growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley P. Knight

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles