World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
23772
World Ranking
16160
National Ranking
8130

Frank Pelosi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Pelosi sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 269 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank Pelosi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Pelosi sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Pelosi is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with an emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Biomedical Engineering, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Neurology, and Surgery.

The scientist's research topics cover a variety of areas within cardiology and related disciplines. The prominent topics include:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Frank Pelosi has contributed multiple publications in well-known journals related to cardiovascular electrophysiology and arrhythmias. Frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • Circulation
  • JACC. Clinical electrophysiology

Recent and relevant scientific papers authored or co-authored by Pelosi include:

  • Effect of metformin on outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (2021), published in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Heart Rhythm Society's survey assessing same-day discharge after electrophysiology procedures and implementation in ambulatory surgical centers (2024), published in Heart Rhythm
  • A comparison of clinical outcomes and cost of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia (2022), published in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Comparative Efficacy of Dofetilide Versus Amiodarone in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (2021), published in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation in young adults with atrial fibrillation (2021), published in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers in related areas. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Mohammed Saeed
  • Ryan Cunnane
  • Hamid Ghanbari
  • Rakesh Latchamsetty
  • Krit Jongnarangsin

Best Publications

  • Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

    Hakan Oral;Bradley P. Knight;Hiroshi Tada;Mehmet Özaydın

  • Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.

    Hakan Oral;Carlo Pappone;Aman Chugh;Eric Good

  • Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Segmental Pulmonary Vein Ostial Ablation Versus Left Atrial Ablation

    Hakan Oral;Christoph Scharf;Aman Chugh;Burr Hall

  • Relationship between burden of premature ventricular complexes and left ventricular function.

    Timir S. Baman;Dave C. Lange;Karl J. Ilg;Sanjaya K. Gupta

  • Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Complex Electrograms

    Hakan Oral;Aman Chugh;Eric Good;Alan Wimmer

  • Radiofrequency ablation of frequent, idiopathic premature ventricular complexes: comparison with a control group without intervention.

    Frank Bogun;Thomas Crawford;Stephen Reich;Todd M. Koelling

  • Clinical significance of early recurrences of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation

    Hakan Oral;Bradley P Knight;Mehmet Özaydın;Hiroshi Tada

  • Risk of Thromboembolic Events After Percutaneous Left Atrial Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

    Hakan Oral;Aman Chugh;Mehmet Özaydin;Eric Good

  • A Randomized Assessment of the Incremental Role of Ablation of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms After Antral Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Long-Lasting Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

    Hakan Oral;Aman Chugh;Kentaro Yoshida;Jean F. Sarrazin

  • Prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical significance of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia during and following left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation.

    Aman Chugh;Hakan Oral;Kristina Lemola;Burr Hall

  • Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Anatomy of the Left Atrium and the Esophagus. Implications for Left Atrial Catheter Ablation

    Kristina Lemola;Michael Sneider;Benoit Desjardins;Ian Case

  • Atrial Tachycardia After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanistic Insights, Results of Catheter Ablation, and Risk Factors for Recurrence

    Sanders Chae;Hakan Oral;Eric Good;Sujoya Dey

  • Delayed-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Utility for Identifying the Ventricular Arrhythmia Substrate

    Frank M. Bogun;Benoit Desjardins;Eric Good;Sanjaya Gupta

  • Diagnostic value of tachycardia features and pacing maneuvers during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

    Bradley P Knight;Matthew Ebinger;Hakan Oral;Michael H Kim

  • Noninducibility of Atrial Fibrillation as an End Point of Left Atrial Circumferential Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation A Randomized Study

    Hakan Oral;Aman Chugh;Kristina Lemola;Peter Cheung

  • Segmental Ostial Ablation to Isolate the Pulmonary Veins During Atrial Fibrillation: Feasibility and Mechanistic Insights

    Hakan Oral;Bradley P. Knight;Mehmet Özaydın;Aman Chugh

  • Isolated potentials during sinus rhythm and pace-mapping within scars as guides for ablation of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia.

    Frank Bogun;Eric Good;Stephen Reich;Darryl Elmouchi

  • A technique for the rapid diagnosis of atrial tachycardia in the electrophysiology laboratory.

    Bradley P Knight;Adam Zivin;Joseph Souza;Matthew Flemming

  • Outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope treated with an implantable defibrillator

    Bradley P Knight;Rajiva Goyal;Frank Pelosi;Matthew Flemming

  • Movement of the esophagus during left atrial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

    Eric Good;Hakan Oral;Kristina Lemola;Jihn Han

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Morady
Fred Morady University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hakan Oral
Hakan Oral University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Frank Bogun
Frank Bogun University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bradley P. Knight
Bradley P. Knight Northwestern University
Ella A. Kazerooni
Ella A. Kazerooni University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stefan H. Hohnloser
Stefan H. Hohnloser Goethe University Frankfurt
Kim A. Eagle
Kim A. Eagle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
José Jalife
José Jalife University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert T. Kennedy
Robert T. Kennedy University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brenda W. Gillespie
Brenda W. Gillespie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens up a variety of related online degree options and career trajectories. If you’re interested in bridging your nursing credentials, adn to fnp programs offer a flexible route for registered nurses to become Family Nurse Practitioners entirely online, supporting your progression without pausing your career.

Health and wellness careers are also in demand, and pursuing online nutrition degree programs can lead to roles in clinical dietetics, health education, and more. Aspiring leaders may consider the cahme accredited online mha programs list to find quality, recognized options for earning a Master of Healthcare Administration. These programs are ideal for those seeking managerial roles in healthcare systems.

For nurses looking to advance with maximum flexibility, there are now online rn-bsn programs without clinicals. These allow working professionals to upgrade their qualifications without the need for additional clinical hours.

Whether you're seeking clinical, administrative, or wellness-focused roles, these online pathways provide accessible opportunities to advance your healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Pelosi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles